Write an essay that addresses each of the following points: 1.Choose five U.S. government policies that affect trade with foreign nations. Identify three factors of production, and describe how their mobility is good or bad for U.S. trade 2.Distinguish between absolute advantage and comparative advantage trade theories and give examples 3.Choose either the TPP or the T-TIP free trade agreement and describe which other countries have signed on and why the U.S. Senate should ratify or not ratify the agreement. Also, explain how regional trading groups influence organizations.
Cronbach's alpha was more prominent than 0.7 ( α = .752), and along these lines solid. There were no critical contrasts in frames of mind toward monthly cycle by condition (F>0.05).. Unmistakable measurements among all factors incorporated into the investigation are appeared Table 1. At the bivariate dimension, it was discovered that ladies who showed more noteworthy state self-externalization had progressively negative frames of mind toward feminine cycle. The frequencies and rates for scores on the women's activist character measures are exhibited in Table 2. A multivariate direct relapse was led to analyze the degree to which menstrual information, forbidden messages, and dispositions toward period foresee state self-externalization (see Table 3). Likewise, to test the directing impact of learning on the connection between unthinkable messages and self-generalization. The model represented 3.8% of the change in self-typification, F(3, 60) = 1.832, p >.005 . Huge indicators were mentalities toward period. The individuals who had negative mentalities toward feminine cycle were fundamentally bound to self-externalize than the individuals who had uplifting demeanors toward monthly cycle, β = 0.285, t = 2.245, p = .029. Furthermore, the individuals who announced larger amounts of menstrual learning did not significantly affect self-generalization, β = - .024, t = - 0.192, p = .849. The kind of message that was appeared (forbidden versus non-unthinkable) did not significantly affect self-typification, β = .012, t = .095, p = .925. At last, we tried the association among condition and menstrual information on and including the connection impact did not fundamentally improve the change represented. Consequently, there was not directing impact which was conflicting with our theory. We at that point inspected whether ladies who are women's activists will be less inclined to self-generalize because of menstrual forbidden than ladies who are egalitarians and non-women's activists by leading a 2(condition) X 3(feminist character) factorial ANOVA to look at the consequences for self-generalization (see Table 4). Condition included two dimensions (forbidden [N=33] versus non unthinkable [N=35]) and women's activist personality comprised of three dimensions (women's activist, populist, and non-women's activist). The ANOVA uncovered that there was no primary impact of condition on self-externalization , F(1,65) = .104, p = .749, recommending that ladies who were in the unthinkable condition (M = 4.045, SD = .138) did not contrast in state-self generalization in contrast with the non-forbidden condition (M = 3.981, SD = .143). The ANOVA uncovered that there was no principle impact of women's activist character on self-typification, F(2,65) = .487, p = .617, proposing that non-women's activists (M = 4.161, SD = .204), egalitarians (M = 3.888, SD = .192) and women's activists (M = 3.990,>GET ANSWER