prepare functional specification documentation.
Description:
Define the Business and Functional requirements of a website
As a business owner, think about the website you want to build for assessment 3.
This could be for an existing business or something entirely new. It could be a personal portfolio for your own work.
Define at least 2 Business Requirements of this website. (eg: we need to make more money, we need to increase
mailing list subscribers etc)
From that point, define at least 5 Functional requirements to meet those goals.
The individual student report will:
- define the project and its goals;
- write functional requirements to achieve the goals;
- create workflow diagrams to help define your requirements;
Details:
Workload: 1000 words or equivalent.
Upload final presentation to Moodle as a PDF file for marking.
ASSESSMENT BRIEF I CODING FUNDAMENTALS
File: 111_CFU_Assessment2 1
Author: Vervaart / Thomson / Hemphill Date: 24/06/20 Status: Final
Marking Criteria & Rubrics:
Criterion 1: Comprehensiveness of specification document â 40%
Fail: ⢠Specification document incomplete
⢠Non-submission
Pass: ⢠Specification document consists of most required elements
⢠Poor description
Credit: ⢠Specification document consists of all required elements
⢠Clear descriptions
Distinction: ⢠Specification document consists of all required elements
⢠Detailed descriptions
High Distinction ⢠Specification document consists of all required elements
⢠Highly detailed descriptions
Criterion 3: Definition of business principles and functionality â 40%
Fail: ⢠Definition of business principles and functionality irrelevant
⢠Non-submission
Pass: ⢠Some relevance of business principles
⢠Only basic understanding of functionality
Credit: ⢠Relevant business principles
⢠Good level of functionality
Distinction: ⢠High relevance of business principles
⢠Deep understanding of functionality
High Distinction ⢠Precise and ideal alignment with business principles
⢠Insightful understanding of functionality
Criterion 4: Quality of presentation â 20%
Fail: ⢠Non-submission
⢠Unclear of incomprehensible presentation
⢠Extremely poor spelling and grammar
⢠Support visuals lacking
Pass: ⢠Simple presentation
⢠Poor spelling and grammar
⢠Limited support visuals
Credit: ⢠Good presentation
⢠Some spelling and grammar errors
⢠Support visuals aid the presentation
Distinction: ⢠Very good presentation
⢠Well-expressed and no spelling and grammar errors
⢠Clear communication and visuals
⢠Presenter engages the audience
High Distinction ⢠Outstanding presentation
⢠Excellent expression with no spelling and grammar errors
⢠Clear communication and well-designed visuals
Sample Solution