What are the fundamental differences between Quality Management and Quality Control? Philosophically, how
are they different?
Sample solution
Dante Alighieri played a critical role in the literature world through his poem Divine Comedy that was written in the 14th century. The poem contains Inferno, Purgatorio, and Paradiso. The Inferno is a description of the nine circles of torment that are found on the earth. It depicts the realms of the people that have gone against the spiritual values and who, instead, have chosen bestial appetite, violence, or fraud and malice. The nine circles of hell are limbo, lust, gluttony, greed and wrath. Others are heresy, violence, fraud, and treachery. The purpose of this paper is to examine the Dante’s Inferno in the perspective of its portrayal of God’s image and the justification of hell.
In this epic poem, God is portrayed as a super being guilty of multiple weaknesses including being egotistic, unjust, and hypocritical. Dante, in this poem, depicts God as being more human than divine by challenging God’s omnipotence. Additionally, the manner in which Dante describes Hell is in full contradiction to the morals of God as written in the Bible. When god arranges Hell to flatter Himself, He commits egotism, a sin that is common among human beings (Cheney, 2016). The weakness is depicted in Limbo and on the Gate of Hell where, for instance, God sends those who do not worship Him to Hell. This implies that failure to worship Him is a sin.
God is also depicted as lacking justice in His actions thus removing the godly image. The injustice is portrayed by the manner in which the sodomites and opportunists are treated. The opportunists are subjected to banner chasing in their lives after death followed by being stung by insects and maggots. They are known to having done neither good nor bad during their lifetimes and, therefore, justice could have demanded that they be granted a neutral punishment having lived a neutral life. The sodomites are also punished unfairly by God when Brunetto Lattini is condemned to hell despite being a good leader (Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). While he commited sodomy, God chooses to ignore all the other good deeds that Brunetto did.
Finally, God is also portrayed as being hypocritical in His actions, a sin that further diminishes His godliness and makes Him more human. A case in point is when God condemns the sin of egotism and goes ahead to commit it repeatedly. Proverbs 29:23 states that “arrogance will bring your downfall, but if you are humble, you will be respected.” When Slattery condemns Dante’s human state as being weak, doubtful, and limited, he is proving God’s hypocrisy because He is also human (Verdicchio, 2015). The actions of God in Hell as portrayed by Dante are inconsistent with the Biblical literature. Both Dante and God are prone to making mistakes, something common among human beings thus making God more human.
To wrap it up, Dante portrays God is more human since He commits the same sins that humans commit: egotism, hypocrisy, and injustice. Hell is justified as being a destination for victims of the mistakes committed by God. The Hell is presented as being a totally different place as compared to what is written about it in the Bible. As a result, reading through the text gives an image of God who is prone to the very mistakes common to humans thus ripping Him off His lofty status of divine and, instead, making Him a mere human. Whether or not Dante did it intentionally is subject to debate but one thing is clear in the poem: the misconstrued notion of God is revealed to future generations.
References
Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). Dante’s inferno: Seven deadly sins in scientific publishing and how to avoid them. Addiction Science: A Guide for the Perplexed, 267.
Cheney, L. D. G. (2016). Illustrations for Dante’s Inferno: A Comparative Study of Sandro Botticelli, Giovanni Stradano, and Federico Zuccaro. Cultural and Religious Studies, 4(8), 487.
Verdicchio, M. (2015). Irony and Desire in Dante’s” Inferno” 27. Italica, 285-297.
Sample Answer
Sample Answer
Fundamental Differences between Quality Management and Quality Control
Quality Management and Quality Control are two essential components of ensuring product or service quality within an organization. While they are interconnected and share the goal of achieving high-quality outcomes, there are fundamental differences between them, both in terms of their focus and their philosophical approaches.
1. Focus
Quality Management: Quality Management encompasses a broader perspective that focuses on the overall quality of processes and systems within an organization. It involves strategic planning, setting quality objectives, and implementing policies and procedures to ensure consistent quality throughout the entire organization. Quality Management aims to prevent defects and errors from occurring in the first place by emphasizing a proactive approach to quality.
Quality Control: Quality Control, on the other hand, is more specific and focuses on inspecting and testing products or services at various stages of production or delivery. It involves monitoring and verifying that the set standards and specifications are met. Quality Control aims to identify defects or deviations from the desired quality and takes corrective action to rectify them. It is a reactive approach that primarily deals with identifying and rectifying quality issues after they have occurred.
2. Philosophy
Quality Management: Quality Management adopts a holistic and continuous improvement philosophy. It emphasizes that quality is everyone’s responsibility within the organization, from top management to frontline employees. It promotes a culture of quality throughout the organization, where all employees are engaged in identifying opportunities for improvement, making data-driven decisions, and continuously enhancing processes to achieve better outcomes. Quality Management seeks to embed quality into the organization’s culture and values.
Quality Control: Quality Control, on the other hand, follows a more inspection-based philosophy. It focuses on detecting and eliminating defects through inspection and testing. Quality Control aims to ensure that products or services meet predetermined standards and specifications. Its primary concern is meeting established quality criteria rather than driving continuous improvement throughout the organization.
3. Approach
Quality Management: Quality Management takes a proactive approach by emphasizing prevention rather than detection. It employs various quality tools and techniques such as statistical process control, Six Sigma, Lean methodologies, and Total Quality Management (TQM) principles to identify potential areas of improvement, eliminate waste, reduce variability, and enhance overall performance. Quality Management aims to optimize processes, enhance customer satisfaction, and achieve long-term success through a focus on continuous improvement.
Quality Control: Quality Control follows a reactive approach by primarily focusing on detecting and correcting defects. It involves conducting inspections, tests, and audits at different stages of production or delivery to ensure compliance with established standards. Quality Control aims to identify deviations from desired quality levels and take corrective actions to bring the product or service back into conformity.
In summary, while both Quality Management and Quality Control are essential in ensuring product or service quality, they differ in their focus, philosophy, and approach. Quality Management takes a broader perspective, emphasizing prevention, continuous improvement, and a holistic organizational approach. On the other hand, Quality Control has a more specific focus on inspecting and testing products/services, detecting deviations from standards, and taking corrective actions.
