Each response should be up to 1500 words (max), and should refer to at least 6 course readings
or other course resources (including videos, reports posted to cuLearn or noted in the syllabus,
and lectures by guest speakers). Each response should take the form of a mini-essay, with an
introduction that includes an overarching thesis statement and an outline of your response.
Notes: It is acceptable to participate in group discussions as you prepare for the written
exam, but your exam must be written by you alone. As with an essay, sources cited must be
properly referenced (APA or Chicago style).
1) What does it mean to adopt a political-economy approach to analyzing food systems? How
have some of the authors you’ve read employed a political economy analysis? How are their
approaches similar or different? What does their work reveal about the dynamics of food
systems? What does political economy analysis bring to debates about public policies?
In your response, provide reference to specific examples from one or two of the following
topics studied in this course: Food aid, the 2007-08 food price crisis, the regulations governing
global food trade and transnational corporations, the development and regulation of
Genetically-Modified Organisms (GMOs), social movement engagement in food issues.
2) What do you see as the key opportunities and challenges associated with developing a Food
Policy for Canada (FPC)? Why is Canada developing a FPC? What are some of the key
challenges this policy will seek to address? What are the jurisdictional and sectoral tensions
that need to be worked through in order to have a FPC that has an impact? Do you think an
effective FPC is possible? Why or why not?
In your analysis, draw on examples from one specific policy topic implicated in a FPC, explaining
why policy change on this topic might be needed, the role that a FPC could play, and the
challenges and/or opportunities presented in terms of politics, policy and programming.
Examples of policy topics include: dietary guidelines, Indigenous food systems, migrant
agricultural labour, policies affecting farmers (e.g. supply management, risk management
programs), biodiversity protection, climate change mitigation, a proposed national school food
The purpose behind this investigation is to test the effect of Perceived Organizational Support on Job satisfaction and to choose the effect of intervention of Trust on Job Satisfaction in the two unmistakable portions of work Public and Private. Here Sector of Employment goes about as an authority and Job Trust as the go between. Plan/system/approach: A survey was organized and controlled to 182 delegates working in individuals when all is said in done and the private portion in different endeavors like Banking, Mining, Power Generation and Information Technology. Revelations: The investigation has developed positive associations between the three creates of evident various leveled help, work satisfaction and occupation trust for the general model and open portion delegates, however these relations are not basic in case of private zone laborers. The mediation effect of Trust is basic at 10% for the general model sans freely in the private and open division. Research limitations/proposals: The respondents have contrasted profiles with respect to age/years of experience, rank level and the organizations that they work in. These results may not be generalizable to all laborers in various relationship in different organizations and geographic zones. In like manner, an extensive level of responses have been assembled through the web which isn't an out and out exact and strong sort of data amassing. Suitable repercussions: The investigation disclosures are depended upon to help the present relationship in individuals all in all and private region to understand purposes behind lessening occupation satisfaction of the specialists and devise ways to deal with upgrade the perspective of legitimate help. Imagination/regard: This paper mulls over the refinement in the associations showed between Perceived progressive enable, work to trust and occupation satisfaction in the private and open zone in the Indian setting. This is one of the essential undertakings towards focus the business parts on a comparable preface. Catchphrases: Seen Organizational Support, Job Trust, Job Satisfaction, Public Sector, Private Sector Introduction: Business Satisfaction is a measure of how content an individual is with his movement. Numerous models have been made remembering the ultimate objective to elucidate conditions and final products of occupation satisfaction, for example, impact theory, dispositional speculation, two factor speculation and the movement characteristics appear. For an extensive time allotment authorities have been endeavoring to develop relationship among various parameters impacting the action satisfaction, work obligation, work dedication and occupation execution of the agents in the affiliations. This is particularly essential for relationship with a particular true objective to upgrade working conditions, understand the stirring segments and in like manner increase delegate gainfulness by making a sound work environment. Occupation Satisfaction is a marker of specialist perceptions and feelings about their businesses. It can in like manner expect work rehearses like legitimate citizenship,absenteeismandturnover.Another basic and apropos research finding is the association between life satisfaction and occupation satisfaction which is seen to compare. It infers that a man who is content with his movement may be exceptionally content with his life and the a different way. Occupation satisfaction is acknowledged to distinctly impact the productivity of the laborer which is essential to strength units that are importance to grow yields. Seen various leveled cause is regularly thought to be a dynamic association between the business and his laborers. According to Rhoades and Eisenberger(2002) the accomplices share a comparing relationship where higher POS is associated with sincere undertakings put in by the specialist to achieve progressive goals. Research revelations suggest that master delegates will likely observe higher definitive help when they unequivocally identified with their workplace and a positive relationship was seen between work execution and POS (Heckman et al., 2009). Our investigation goes for analyzing the association between observed progressive help and occupation satisfaction. Place stock in goes about as a go between in our model. Seen definitive help is how much agents assume that their affiliation regards their responsibilities and considers their success. Trust is to believe the person who you trust to do what you expect and work satisfaction depicts how content an individual is with his or her action. This investigation attempts to consider and develop associations between the creates for individuals when all is said in done and private division laborers in India. There are distinctive standard scales open to evaluate each one of these parameters. In this examination we have generally used the shortened interpretation of the scales. Research establishment and Hypothesis Seen Organizational Support: The possibility of progressive help has sufficiently made eagerness for demand to mull over its impact on execution of the specialists. The wisdom a delegate makes about his/her affiliation regarding his duties and contemplating his interests and flourishing is named as Perceived Organizational Support (POS)(Eisenberger and Rhoades,2002). A meta-examination has demonstrated that three significant characterizations of wants that an agent has from his work affiliation are connected with POS. They are reasonableness of frameworks, support of the incite unrivaled and execution related prizes and awesome work conditions. Thinking about the organizations' wants from their agents, they regard responsibility and constancy. Feeling driven point of view of various leveled obligation underlines that the sentiment solidarity felt by the agent and the characteristics that he confers to the affiliation choose the execution and non-appearance levels, probability of leaving his place of work (Mathieu and Zajac, 1990;Meyer and Allen, 1997; Mowday, Porter, and Steers, 1982). Social Exchange researchers express that work is a give and take relationship of responsibility and unwavering quality for considerable prizes and social favorable circumstances (e.g., Bateman and Organ, 1983; Brief and Motowidlo, 1986). The ancestors of POS and its outcomes are elucidated by the various leveled help theory which (Eisenberger, Huntington, Hutchison, and Sowa, 1986). This speculation acknowledge that to choose affiliation's accessibility to remunerate delegate attempts and meet their socio excited necessities, specialist shapes general feelings about the stress showed up and expected in future by his relationship towards him. POS is moreover seen as an insistence of the assistance that will be open to the delegate amidst torment (cf. George, Reed, Ballard, Colin, and Fielding, 1993). Moves made by the administrators of the affiliation are illustrative of its objective and are not singular manners of thinking. The representation of the affiliation is maintained by its great and legal obligations, culture, models and methodologies. Agents outline perceptions in light of the above pointers about the assistance they get from their work affiliation (Levinson, 1965). This speculation moreover communicates that POS should develop a type of a dedication in the delegate to perform for the affiliation and help accomplish its goals. The part keenness of agents is acknowledged to depend upon the activities that the affiliation sees as essential for compelling business execution (Porter and Lawler, 1968). Execution is required to increase with higher undertakings put in by the specialist and the perception that such profitable undertakings will be adjusted (Campbell, Dunnette, Lawler, and Weick, 1970; Katz, 1964). Occupation Trust Trust is a champion among the most basic fundamentals on which a business specialist relationship is based. This relationship goes far in granting conviction and destructing fear by influencing a working environment to free of pressure and uncertainty (Zeffane et.al, 2003). Trust has similarly been proposed to be a psychological state as demonstrated by which it is assessed in view of seen lack of protection or danger as a result of the powerlessness included (Kramer, 1999). In our examination work we are stressed over the trust inside the affiliation i.e. the level of trust the delegates have in the affiliation they work for, basically among specialists and boss or chiefs. In this way in a definitive setting trust relies upon the social exchange theory fundamentally (Whitener et al., 1998), which reveals trust to be an aftereffect of exchange of focal points between the two get-togethers included. The fundamental thought required here is "correspondence", which develops the way that enthusiasm for the delegates in a relationship to the extent affirmation, reinforcing, value, support and distinctive favors will constantly be returned and not go waste (Gouldner, 1960). Agreeing the investigation done by Prusak and Cohen (2001), it is doable for directors to develop a circumstance of trust in the relationship by engaging shared trust, and support. This therefore fabricates the level of clear trust in the relationship by the delegates. It has in like manner been fought this trust in (McAllister, 1995) is the best approach to progressive trust and control. It prompts extended level of agent bolster which incorporates fundamental administration control in the hands of the subordinates which would unavoidably incite increase in messes up. Thusly, by doling out this vitality to the subordinates the affiliation grows the peril factor however meanwhile, since this assignment needs a commitment of trust in (Yukl, 1994), gives an unmistakable sign that affiliation has confidence in its laborers and in this way the individual sees this definitive trust and subsequently contributes reasonably and decidedly.>GET ANSWER