Furthermore I believe it is important for states to make their own legislation regarding guns; while federal law can provide a foundation such matters ultimately must tailored specific needs each area timescale set initial outset tasks allocated concerned parties alike . For example some states may more lax regulations due lower prevalence incidents related weapon misuse others stricter more stringent ones order ensure greater degree security protect citizens therein increases chance success being achieved desired outcomes reached accordingly . Additionally creating uniform guidelines across country makes difficult enforcement measures since cannot solely rely upon overarching authority figure handle issue individually instead smaller regional governing bodies need responsible implementing rules within respective jurisdictions end user requirements met smoothly consistently given budget constraints available

Sample Solution

As a proponent of gun control, I believe that the possession and use of firearms should be tightly regulated by state governments in order to reduce deaths from gun violence. While the Second Amendment does provide for individuals to bear arms, this should not be taken as an unquestioned right but rather one that requires strict control and oversight. Gun ownership is a matter of public safety, which means it is essential for states to have laws in place limiting access to weapons , ensuring appropriate background checks are conducted when buying firearms, and mandating training prior to purchase end user requirements met smoothly consistently given budget constraints available.