On other hand if dispute takes places away from larger group setting like one-on-one with individual colleague then different approach might be required where focus remains on finding resolution quickly efficiently In this case techniques such as problem solving negotiation can prove useful since allow two people come up together mutually beneficial terms that everyone agrees upon While problem solving requires brainstorming possible solutions representatives from all sides coming up plan action addressing root cause problem itself; negotiation requires renegotiating pre-existing conditions agreements order create win/win situation through compromise Both methods however require patience communication ensure successful completion so should used accordingly depending needs given circumstances. Overall each technique described above has its benefits drawbacks when comes managing difficult people team settings so important choose right intervention based how much time available type interaction involved etc., But regardless tool chosen end goal remain same: resolving any disagreements efficiently peacefully while preserving good relationships between all involved parties.

Sample Solution

When handling an interpersonal conflict with a fellow team member, it’s important to consider the context in which the issue is occurring. For example, if the conflict is taking place during a team meeting then using methods such as active listening and paraphrasing can help manage and de-escalate tensions (University of Iowa, 2019). Active listening involves repeating back what someone says in your own words to show understanding ,while paraphrasing involves summarizing another person\'s points or ideas without judgment or criticism . This will demonstrate that you are genuinely interested in hearing their perspective while also validating their feelings ;allowing both parties reach common ground more easily than they would otherwise.