The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) is a major regulatory aspect of health care information technology (IT). Complete the following for this assignment:

Identify 1 type of healthcare information system, and explain the steps that would be required to conduct a HIPAA audit of the system within your organization.
Explain what a gap analysis is and why it would be useful for the organization conducting the audit.

Sample solution

Dante Alighieri played a critical role in the literature world through his poem Divine Comedy that was written in the 14th century. The poem contains Inferno, Purgatorio, and Paradiso. The Inferno is a description of the nine circles of torment that are found on the earth. It depicts the realms of the people that have gone against the spiritual values and who, instead, have chosen bestial appetite, violence, or fraud and malice. The nine circles of hell are limbo, lust, gluttony, greed and wrath. Others are heresy, violence, fraud, and treachery. The purpose of this paper is to examine the Dante’s Inferno in the perspective of its portrayal of God’s image and the justification of hell. 

In this epic poem, God is portrayed as a super being guilty of multiple weaknesses including being egotistic, unjust, and hypocritical. Dante, in this poem, depicts God as being more human than divine by challenging God’s omnipotence. Additionally, the manner in which Dante describes Hell is in full contradiction to the morals of God as written in the Bible. When god arranges Hell to flatter Himself, He commits egotism, a sin that is common among human beings (Cheney, 2016). The weakness is depicted in Limbo and on the Gate of Hell where, for instance, God sends those who do not worship Him to Hell. This implies that failure to worship Him is a sin.

God is also depicted as lacking justice in His actions thus removing the godly image. The injustice is portrayed by the manner in which the sodomites and opportunists are treated. The opportunists are subjected to banner chasing in their lives after death followed by being stung by insects and maggots. They are known to having done neither good nor bad during their lifetimes and, therefore, justice could have demanded that they be granted a neutral punishment having lived a neutral life. The sodomites are also punished unfairly by God when Brunetto Lattini is condemned to hell despite being a good leader (Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). While he commited sodomy, God chooses to ignore all the other good deeds that Brunetto did.

Finally, God is also portrayed as being hypocritical in His actions, a sin that further diminishes His godliness and makes Him more human. A case in point is when God condemns the sin of egotism and goes ahead to commit it repeatedly. Proverbs 29:23 states that “arrogance will bring your downfall, but if you are humble, you will be respected.” When Slattery condemns Dante’s human state as being weak, doubtful, and limited, he is proving God’s hypocrisy because He is also human (Verdicchio, 2015). The actions of God in Hell as portrayed by Dante are inconsistent with the Biblical literature. Both Dante and God are prone to making mistakes, something common among human beings thus making God more human.

To wrap it up, Dante portrays God is more human since He commits the same sins that humans commit: egotism, hypocrisy, and injustice. Hell is justified as being a destination for victims of the mistakes committed by God. The Hell is presented as being a totally different place as compared to what is written about it in the Bible. As a result, reading through the text gives an image of God who is prone to the very mistakes common to humans thus ripping Him off His lofty status of divine and, instead, making Him a mere human. Whether or not Dante did it intentionally is subject to debate but one thing is clear in the poem: the misconstrued notion of God is revealed to future generations.

 

References

Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). Dante’s inferno: Seven deadly sins in scientific publishing and how to avoid them. Addiction Science: A Guide for the Perplexed, 267.

Cheney, L. D. G. (2016). Illustrations for Dante’s Inferno: A Comparative Study of Sandro Botticelli, Giovanni Stradano, and Federico Zuccaro. Cultural and Religious Studies4(8), 487.

Verdicchio, M. (2015). Irony and Desire in Dante’s” Inferno” 27. Italica, 285-297.

HIPAA Audit of a Healthcare Information System: Electronic Health Record (EHR) System

Let’s consider an Electronic Health Record (EHR) system as the type of healthcare information system for this HIPAA audit. An EHR system is a digital version of a patient’s paper chart, containing their medical history, diagnoses, medications, treatment plans, immunization dates, allergies, radiology images, and laboratory and test results. It’s a central repository of Protected Health Information (PHI) and therefore falls squarely under HIPAA regulations.  

Here are the steps required to conduct a HIPAA audit of the EHR system within an organization:

Phase 1: Preparation and Planning

HIPAA Audit of a Healthcare Information System: Electronic Health Record (EHR) System

Let’s consider an Electronic Health Record (EHR) system as the type of healthcare information system for this HIPAA audit. An EHR system is a digital version of a patient’s paper chart, containing their medical history, diagnoses, medications, treatment plans, immunization dates, allergies, radiology images, and laboratory and test results. It’s a central repository of Protected Health Information (PHI) and therefore falls squarely under HIPAA regulations.  

Here are the steps required to conduct a HIPAA audit of the EHR system within an organization:

Phase 1: Preparation and Planning

  1. Define the Audit Scope and Objectives: Clearly identify the specific components of the EHR system to be audited (e.g., data entry, access controls, data storage, transmission, disposal). Define the objectives of the audit, such as assessing compliance with specific HIPAA Security and Privacy Rules, identifying vulnerabilities, and ensuring data integrity and confidentiality.
  2. Establish an Audit Team: Assemble a multidisciplinary team with expertise in IT, security, privacy, legal, and clinical operations. Assign clear roles and responsibilities to team members.
  3. Review Relevant HIPAA Regulations and Organizational Policies: Ensure the audit team has a thorough understanding of the HIPAA Privacy Rule, Security Rule, and Breach Notification Rule, as well as the organization’s own policies and procedures related to PHI and the EHR system.
  4. Develop an Audit Plan and Checklist: Create a detailed plan outlining the audit timeline, resources required, methodologies to be used (e.g., documentation review, system testing, interviews), and specific areas of focus. Develop a comprehensive audit checklist based on HIPAA requirements and organizational policies to ensure all critical areas are covered.
  5. Communicate with Stakeholders: Inform relevant departments and personnel about the upcoming audit, its purpose, and the expected level of cooperation. Address any concerns and answer questions.

Phase 2: Data Gathering and Review

  1. Documentation Review: Examine existing documentation related to the EHR system, including:
    • System architecture and design
    • Security policies and procedures (e.g., access control, password management, incident response)  
    • Privacy policies and procedures (e.g., Notice of Privacy Practices, patient rights)
    • Data backup and disaster recovery plans
    • Business Associate Agreements (BAAs) with vendors involved in the EHR system
    • Training logs for users on HIPAA and EHR system security and privacy
    • Audit logs of system access and activity
    • Risk assessments and vulnerability scan reports
  2. System Testing and Technical Assessment: Conduct technical assessments of the EHR system, including:
    • Reviewing access controls and user permissions to ensure least privilege is enforced.
    • Analyzing password policies and their enforcement.
    • Evaluating encryption methods for data at rest and in transit.
    • Examining audit log configurations and retention policies.
    • Performing vulnerability scans to identify potential security weaknesses.
    • Testing the effectiveness of data backup and recovery procedures.
    • Assessing the security of any interfaces with other systems.
  3. Interviews and Observations: Conduct interviews with key personnel, including IT staff, security officers, privacy officers, clinicians, and administrative staff, to understand their roles, responsibilities, and practices related to the EHR system and PHI. Observe workflows and processes related to data entry, access, and disclosure.
  4. Physical Security Assessment: Evaluate the physical security of the data centers or server rooms housing the EHR system and related infrastructure, ensuring appropriate access controls and environmental safeguards are in place.

Phase 3: Analysis and Reporting

  1. Data Analysis: Analyze the gathered documentation, technical assessment results, interview transcripts, and observation notes to identify any deviations from HIPAA requirements and organizational policies.
  2. Identify Findings and Potential Risks: Document all audit findings, categorizing them based on the HIPAA Rule they relate to (Privacy, Security, or Breach Notification). Assess the potential risks associated with each finding, considering the likelihood and impact on the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of PHI.
  3. Develop Recommendations: For each identified gap or deficiency, develop specific, actionable, and measurable recommendations for remediation. Prioritize recommendations based on the severity of the risk.
  4. Prepare the Audit Report: Compile a comprehensive audit report summarizing the audit scope, objectives, methodologies, findings, identified risks, and recommendations. Include supporting evidence and clearly communicate the overall level of HIPAA compliance of the EHR system.
  5. Present Findings to Management: Present the audit report and findings to senior management and relevant stakeholders, including the HIPAA Security and Privacy Officers. Discuss the recommendations and obtain buy-in for implementing corrective actions.

Phase 4: Follow-up and Remediation

  1. Develop a Remediation Plan: Work with relevant departments to develop a detailed plan outlining the steps, timelines, and responsible parties for implementing the audit recommendations.
  2. Monitor Remediation Efforts: Track the progress of the remediation plan and provide regular updates to management.
  3. Conduct Follow-up Audits: Perform periodic follow-up audits to ensure that the identified gaps have been effectively addressed and that ongoing compliance is maintained.

Gap Analysis and Its Usefulness

A gap analysis is a systematic process of comparing the current state of a system, process, or organization to a desired future state or a set of requirements (in this case, HIPAA regulations and organizational policies). It identifies the “gaps” or discrepancies between what is currently in place and what is needed to achieve the desired level of compliance or performance.  

Why a gap analysis would be useful for the organization conducting the HIPAA audit:

  1. Pinpointing Specific Areas of Non-Compliance: The audit process generates a wealth of data. A gap analysis provides a structured way to organize and analyze this data, clearly highlighting the specific areas where the EHR system and related practices fall short of HIPAA requirements. This allows the organization to focus its remediation efforts on the most critical deficiencies.
  2. Prioritizing Remediation Efforts: By identifying the gaps and assessing the associated risks, the organization can prioritize which areas need immediate attention and allocate resources effectively. Gaps with high risk to PHI security and privacy would be addressed before less critical issues.
  3. Developing a Targeted Remediation Plan: The detailed information provided by the gap analysis forms the foundation for a specific and actionable remediation plan. For each identified gap, the analysis can suggest the necessary steps to bridge the difference between the current state and HIPAA compliance.
  4. Measuring Progress and Effectiveness: After implementing corrective actions, a follow-up gap analysis can be conducted to measure the progress made in achieving HIPAA compliance and to assess the effectiveness of the implemented solutions. This provides objective evidence of improvement.
  5. Improving Overall Security and Privacy Posture: Beyond mere compliance, the gap analysis helps the organization understand its vulnerabilities and weaknesses related to PHI. Addressing these gaps strengthens the overall security and privacy posture of the organization, reducing the risk of data breaches and protecting patient information.
  6. Facilitating Communication and Understanding: A well-documented gap analysis provides a clear and concise overview of the organization’s HIPAA compliance status, facilitating communication among different departments, management, and external auditors. It helps everyone understand the specific areas needing improvement.
  7. Supporting Continuous Improvement: The gap analysis is not a one-time activity. Regularly conducting gap analyses as part of ongoing monitoring helps the organization stay abreast of evolving HIPAA regulations and identify new potential vulnerabilities, fostering a culture of continuous improvement in security and privacy practices.

In summary, a gap analysis is an invaluable tool for an organization conducting a HIPAA audit of its EHR system. It provides a structured framework for identifying, analyzing, and prioritizing compliance gaps, ultimately leading to a more effective and targeted approach to achieving and maintaining HIPAA compliance and protecting the sensitive health information of patients.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer