Describe the difference between Thomas Hobbes and John Locke. This may have to do with how each thinker defines the law of nature, or how power is negotiated between the ruler and the ruled. Keep in mind that in Hobbes, the ruler is the “sovereign” and the ruled are the “subjects.” In Locke, the “executive” is the ruler and does not have limitless power as the “sovereign” in Hobbes.
Second part of essay: Maximilien Robespierre’s speech, referred to as “Justification for the Use of Terror” argues for the need to strengthen the state against enemies from within through the use of terror. He writes,
“If the spring of popular government in time of peace is virtue, the springs of popular government in revolution are at once virtue and terror: virtue, without which terror is fatal; terror, without which virtue is powerless. Terror is nothing other than justice, prompt, severe, inflexible; it is therefore an emanation of virtue; it is not so much a special principle as it is a consequence of the general principle of democracy applied to our country’s most urgent needs.”
Can you think of a time in U.S. History when this policy of using terror to subdue rebellion was used? (Another way of thinking about “terror” is the use of state-sanctioned violence.) Alternatively, can you imagine a political situation in this country in which Robespierre’s recommendation to use terror as a means to subdue rebellion would be warranted?
were affected more noteworthy by chauvinist occasions than women's activist ladies, which means non-women's activist ladies receied increasingly mental pain when looked with misogynist occasions. This is useful in light of the fact that women's activist cognizance were ended up being a one of a kind factor that could debilitate the connection between chauvinist occasions and mental pain. So as to illuminate and propel the discoveries of past examinations, we will quantify Feminist Identity utilizing the Feminist Beliefs and Behavior scale (Zucker, 2004). The scale contains three things about the cardinal convictions of women's activists replied in a yes/no configuration pursued by one dichotomous inquiry to get to the members' readiness to recognize as a women's activist. Instances of things incorporate, "Young ladies and ladies have not been treated just as young men and men in our general public" and "Ladies and men ought to be paid similarly for a similar work". Members will reply to every thing in a dichotomous, yes/no organization. In light of past research, we expect out theory, "Ladies who distinguish themselves as women's activists or have center convictions of women's activists will be less inclined to self-typify because of menstrual forbidden" to be valid. Each development made by women's activist is to express their certainty and acknowledgment of oneself. In doing as such the hate and taboos of feminine cycle will move, making trust in all lady to have the capacity to discuss periods without inclination humiliated. Each study has proof that demonstrates the ground breaking and convictions over non women's activist lady with regards to sex, feminine cycle and body certainty. At last, we will utilize an example of around 68 females from a PIPER pool at The College of New Jersey. Numerous examinations have utilized comparative matured female members so it will intrigue contrast our outcomes with earlier research. There are not very numerous past examinations that look at the impacts of period unthinkable on women's activist character and self-typification on ladies.>GET ANSWER