Provide context for your analysis: The target audience. When and where it was displayed. if that is important to your interpretation.
One sentence about how the theme of the visual relates to the real world.
Introduce topic or theme. Explain the main idea or claim the visual is trying to produce in the audience.
State your thesis.
Summarize the visual (one paragraph): describe what it looks like and what it says (a strict summary no analysis). End with a citation. i Le
Argue (three paragraphs): Choose three rhetorical devices (one to two from the connotations and at least one from the advanced list of
thetoric. the denotations). Provide evidence from the visual to support your argument. Explain how they persuade the audience. How are
they used to provoke logos and pathos? How does the visual create ethos through a rhetorical device?
Conclude (one paragraph): Refer back to the visual and why your thesis matters. Relate your analysis to the real world
someone else is making the choice for them. Battin claims that no act is fully rational with coercion (131).Â This demonstrates that suicide by force could not be rational because if you are being forced with no other options then there is no way that could fully be your decision. Battin also reinforces this in which one of her criteria is that it should meet the interests of that individual (Williams, cited in Battin 1995, 146). Also, both of these points fail the criteria of ability to reason, in which they can move from premises to conclusion (Battin 133). If the individual is being forced or influenced by others, then they cannot figure out the premises or conclusion by themselves. If suicide is forced or not their decision, then it does not meet their interests but the interests of others, demonstrating that suicide in that regards could not be rational. One objection to my argument could be that the person was able to make those decisions by themselves even if they were coerced or influenced by anothe>GET ANSWER