- How do Fuchs-Schuendeln and Hassan (FSH enceforth) define natural experiments?
- According to FSH, what is the main task of a researcher who is analyzing a natural
experiment? - For the purpose of their discussion, how do FSH define the fundamental causes of
economic growth? - For the purpose of their discussion, how do FSH define institutions?
- A type of institution that is believed to be an important determinant of economic
growth and of the current level of per capita income of a country is the degree of
protection of property rights. Explain why (according to FSH) it makes sense to think
that the degree of protection of property rights influences per capita income. Also,
explain why causation could potentially run the other way. - Consider the regression model
log(Yi) = α + βRi + Xiγ + ϵi (1)
where Yi
is income per capita in country i, Ri
is a measure of the protection of property
rights and Xi
is a vector of controls. Let βˆ define the Ordinary Least Squares (OLS)
estimator of β.
(a) What restriction needs to hold for βˆ to be an unbiased estimator of β?
Hint: covariance.
(b) Do Acemoglu, Johnson and Robinson find that Ri
is positively or negatively
related to Yi? - This question makes reference to the econometric model appearing in question 6. To
be a good instrument for the degree of protection of property rights (Ri) a variable
needs to be correlated (positively or negatively) with Ri
. Explain why the disease
environment at the time of European colonization (as measured by the mortality rates
of soldiers, bishops and sailors stationed in country i between 1600 and 1800 CE) may
be correlated with the degree of protection of property rights in country i in present
days. - Regarding the work of Hornbeck and Naidu (2014) reported by FSH:
2
(a) What do they find regarding the effects of the Great Mississipi Flood of 1927 on
the capital intensity of the agricultural sector of flooded and non-flooded areas?
(b) What assumption must hold for their natural experiment to identify the effect of
flooding on capital intensity? - FSH report the work of Acemoglu, Hassan and Tahoun (ACT) who use individual
firm stock returns and intensity of protests in Tahrir Square during Egypt’s Arab
Spring “to measure the real-time effects of popular mobilization in street protests on
investors expectations of economic rents from future favoritism and corruption accruing
to politically connected firms.”
(a) What are the two main identifying assumptions used by ACT?
(b) Do ACT find that the stock returns of all firms are affected in the same manner
by the intensity of street protests? Do their results provide evidence that street
protests may limit corruption? Briefly justify your answers.
Sample Solution