errorist identification. the thing develops an approach which emphasizes the essential role of metaphors within the construction of truth. to illustrate this the article lines the metaphorical production of Al-Qaeda within the German press after the terrorist attacks in the big apple and Washington in 2001, Madrid in 2004 and London in 2005. at first terrorism was represented as a warfare and this guided states into ‘responding militarily’[6]. however, from 2004 onwards the primary metaphor shifted from struggle to crime and as a end result Al-Qaeda turned into built as a crook corporation in place of a navy organisation. The impact of this creation of terrorism as a criminal offense is visible inside the counter terrorism policies of the United Kingdom submit-Sep 11 which focused on immigration rules[7]. This shift, the thing argues has converted Al-Qaeda from an outside risk to an internal threat, which includes a shift in counter-terrorism practices from a army to a judicial response. ‘The view that terrorism is crime leads [states] to favor felony solutions’[8]. the article argues from a constructivist point of view, that terrorism is a social assemble. despite the fact that commonly there may be a particular awareness on the terrorist actor whilst it's far presented to us within the media but, the terrorist actor is a manufactured from discourse consequently discourse is a logical starting point for terrorism evaluation. specially we need to examine the discourse of the terrorists’ enemies as it's miles this which impact the terrorist motivations, techniques, organisational structures and goals. consequently, constructivist analyzing discourse rather than the individual is possibly to offer a more correct view of actor’s motivations. An investigation into metaphorical structures of terrorism via Hulsse and Spencer in 2008 suggests that the trade within the manner the media built terrorism might be because of us ‘getting used to Al Qaeda terrorism’[9]. Terrorism consequently lends itself to constructivist understanding as photos of terror exist in exceptional levels of creation and the manner wherein the media offers terrorism has a massive impact on how states reply to it. Terrorism possibly excellent lends itself to constructivist understanding because of the failure of different IR theories to understand the constructivist orientation of Al Qaeda and this has cause them to come up with a kingdom centric evaluation of terrorism. A constructivist method, thanks to its multidisciplinary know-how can supply greater viable insights approximately the function of norms, ideas, time and context in shaping the relation among states and terrorism as non-country actor. Realism has little or no to contribute to the discussion of Al Qaeda as a transnational actor submit September 11. that is due to the fact at realisms center is the belief that global affairs is a war for energy amongst self-interested states. foreign policy creator Jack Snyder argues because of this method “it's far tough for the state-centric idea to give an explanation for why the world’s handiest superpower introduced a warfare towards Al Qaeda, a non-state terrorist organisation”[10]. international family members creator Burak okayÜRKÇÜ[11] that the assumptions of liberalism on democratic institutions with liberal values and neoliberal understanding of peaceful alternate with the help of institutions also fails to safely well known terrorist companies or explain terrorist pastime. An undivided opinion on the identity of “nation” on one hand, fractured know-how of defining terrorism however makes it quite hard to establish a stable floor with traditional theories.>