The philosophy of race has existed for centuries, and in fact portrayals of race relations in antiquated Egyptian artworks extend as far back as 1350 BC (1). The realms of the antiquated world – Egyptian, Greek, Roman, and later the Muslim domain – included people groups with boundlessly extraordinary skin hues, hair surfaces, and facial highlights. In any case, history demonstrates that Africans in Europe were absorbed into those social orders wherever they were found without critical social contrasts being connected to their physical varieties (2). Moving into the sixteenth century, and enduring until the 1700s, race was a society thought, or a general ordering term saw as exchangeable with terms, for example, type, kind, sort, or breed (2). Nearing the finish of this timeframe, Europeans started experiencing non-European developments with expanding recurrence, and Enlightenment researchers and scholars started crediting an organic importance to race (1). Prominently, Carl Linnaeus, a Swedish doctor, botanist, and zoologist surely understood for setting up the ordered bases used to arrange and name creatures, set forth that species differed by culture and spot (1). The term started being connected to plants, creatures, and people as an ordered subclassification inside an animal varieties, and subsequently, race wound up comprehended as an organic, or regular, arrangement of Homo sapiens (1). Amid the Revolutionary period, as European colonization of the West extended and subjection ended up typical, the idea of race was utilized to legitimize and recommend the abuse, mastery, and viciousness against non-White people groups (1). All things considered, this was a period in which the overwhelming political rationality was that of correspondence, social equality, majority rules system, and equity for every single person, so the main route pioneers of American settlements could legitimize bondage was by downgrading Blacks and other racialized gatherings to nonhuman status (2). Logical examination concerning racial contrasts started amid the second 50% of the eighteenth century, and the nineteenth century saw the commencement of endeavors to evaluate race contrasts through the estimation of heads and other anatomical structures (2). Before the finish of the 1800s, more prominent consideration was being paid to the size and substance of the braincase, and researchers along these lines touched base at the last basis by which they trusted race contrasts could be estimated: the capacity of the mind (2). Thus, in the mid twentieth century, insight tests turned into the predominant focal point of researchers keen on recording the contrasts between races, particularly among Blacks and Whites (2). In 1905, French clinician Alfred Binet distributed the primary insight test with his partner Theodore Simon, known as the Binet test (3). 1916 saw Lewis Terman distribute his changed and Westernized Stanford-Binet test, with the goal of "discover[ing] massively noteworthy racial contrasts all in all insight" (4). These tests were utilized to analyze "inadequate qualities", endorse mass sanitizations of "foolish people", and>