How to manage society’s expectations

    Both Emerson and Brown discuss how to manage society’s expectations. Compare/contrast their advice.
Emerson places a high value on independent thought and creativity, encouraging readers to trust their own judgment rather than blindly adhere to societal conventions. He encourages people to "trust thyself" and emphasizes the importance of developing one's individual identity by rejecting traditional values and ideologies that limit potential. In contrast, Brown views conformity as necessary in some cases, instead suggesting that individuals modify or adjust their behavior when it is required by social standards. His view centers around striking a balance between maintaining an individual identity while also adhering to certain rules or regulations depending upon the context of the situation being faced. When it comes to managing expectations from society, Emerson takes a more radical approach by suggesting we outright reject them if they stand in opposition of our moral beliefs or values. By taking this stance he believes it will enable us to gain greater insight into ourselves and our true capabilities without external inhibitions holding us back from reaching our highest potential. On the other hand, Brown advises finding a way meet these expectations without compromising our core beliefs; he suggests making small adjustments where needed so as not prevent us from realizing our goals while still giving weight to society's demands. In short, while both Emerson and Brown recognize the need for individuals maintain autonomy overtheir decisionsandchoices , howthey advicemanagingsociety’sexpectationsdifferinapproach .ForEmersonitislargelybasedontakingindividualisticstance rejecting thosewhichareincongruentwithmoralcode whereasBrownencouragesfolks strikethebalancebetweenadherencecertainstandardswhilemaintainingpersonalidentityduringprocess .

Sample Solution

Ralph Waldo Emerson and Henry David Thoreau offer different perspectives on how to manage society’s expectations. While both thinkers advocate for individualism, their approaches differ in their emphasis on conformity versus non-conformity.