1. How would you compare Torvald’s communication with Nora to Mrs. Linden’s communication with Krogstad? After reading the first letter from Krogstad, Torvald tells Nora, “You have destroyed my whole happiness. You have ruined my future” (Act 3.575). Did Nora destroy Torvald’s happiness? What is important to Torvald? Does Torvald problematize the fact that Nora illegally forged her father’s signature and borrowed the money, or does he make a big deal that she borrowed the money from Krogstad? Then, Torvald explodes and tells Nora: “As for you and me, we must make no
  2. After reading the second letter from Krogstad, Torvald becomes relieved and tells Nora: “I am saved! . . . I have forgiven you” (Act 3. 576). What is Torvald saved from? Did he “bear the whole burden” (Act 1, 558) after finding out Nora’s borrowing money from Krogstad? Is Nora saved by her husband? What do you make of Torvald’s changed attitude towards Nora? Does Torvald’s view of Nora as a liar and a criminal change after reading the second letter? Torvald says, “But no man sacrifices his honour, even for one he loves” (3. 580). What does he mean by “his honour”? Did Nora sacrifice her honor for the one she loves? Has Nora abandoned her duty as a wife (the wifely duty that she believes)? When Nora decides to leave Torvald, he blames her for “forsaking her holiest duties” as a wife and mother. Nora responds: “That I no longer believe” (Act 3, 579). Why does she no longer believe the socially prescribed gender roles? Has Torvald fulfilled his holy duty as a husband?
  3. After reading the first letter from Krogstad, Torvald tells Nora that he cannot trust her and cannot leave the children in her care because she is a bad influence on her children. Does Torvald trust her after reading the second letter? Why does Torvald warn Nora that she should not “forsake her duties to her husband and children” (3.579) and that her decision to leave home is morally wrong? Did Torvald keep his duty as Nora’s husband? Why does Nora now feel unjust about her life and marriage? Nora tells Torvald that she must leave him to educate herself: “I must stand quite alone if I am ever to know myself and my surroundings; so I cannot stay with you” (Act 3.579). Why does Nora feel that she should fulfill her duty towards herself? Does she have to leave Torvald and the children to educate herself? Can Nora educate herself while staying home with Torvald, or should she educate herself (and learn who she is) without him to be a better mother for her children? Why is Nora saying “The way I am now I’m no use to them [her children]” (Act 3, 581)? What has prevented Nora from knowing who she is and developing her sense of individuality as a human being? Is Nora making an irrational decision of leaving Torvald and her children, or does she make the decision out of necessity?

Sample solution

Dante Alighieri played a critical role in the literature world through his poem Divine Comedy that was written in the 14th century. The poem contains Inferno, Purgatorio, and Paradiso. The Inferno is a description of the nine circles of torment that are found on the earth. It depicts the realms of the people that have gone against the spiritual values and who, instead, have chosen bestial appetite, violence, or fraud and malice. The nine circles of hell are limbo, lust, gluttony, greed and wrath. Others are heresy, violence, fraud, and treachery. The purpose of this paper is to examine the Dante’s Inferno in the perspective of its portrayal of God’s image and the justification of hell. 

In this epic poem, God is portrayed as a super being guilty of multiple weaknesses including being egotistic, unjust, and hypocritical. Dante, in this poem, depicts God as being more human than divine by challenging God’s omnipotence. Additionally, the manner in which Dante describes Hell is in full contradiction to the morals of God as written in the Bible. When god arranges Hell to flatter Himself, He commits egotism, a sin that is common among human beings (Cheney, 2016). The weakness is depicted in Limbo and on the Gate of Hell where, for instance, God sends those who do not worship Him to Hell. This implies that failure to worship Him is a sin.

God is also depicted as lacking justice in His actions thus removing the godly image. The injustice is portrayed by the manner in which the sodomites and opportunists are treated. The opportunists are subjected to banner chasing in their lives after death followed by being stung by insects and maggots. They are known to having done neither good nor bad during their lifetimes and, therefore, justice could have demanded that they be granted a neutral punishment having lived a neutral life. The sodomites are also punished unfairly by God when Brunetto Lattini is condemned to hell despite being a good leader (Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). While he commited sodomy, God chooses to ignore all the other good deeds that Brunetto did.

Finally, God is also portrayed as being hypocritical in His actions, a sin that further diminishes His godliness and makes Him more human. A case in point is when God condemns the sin of egotism and goes ahead to commit it repeatedly. Proverbs 29:23 states that “arrogance will bring your downfall, but if you are humble, you will be respected.” When Slattery condemns Dante’s human state as being weak, doubtful, and limited, he is proving God’s hypocrisy because He is also human (Verdicchio, 2015). The actions of God in Hell as portrayed by Dante are inconsistent with the Biblical literature. Both Dante and God are prone to making mistakes, something common among human beings thus making God more human.

To wrap it up, Dante portrays God is more human since He commits the same sins that humans commit: egotism, hypocrisy, and injustice. Hell is justified as being a destination for victims of the mistakes committed by God. The Hell is presented as being a totally different place as compared to what is written about it in the Bible. As a result, reading through the text gives an image of God who is prone to the very mistakes common to humans thus ripping Him off His lofty status of divine and, instead, making Him a mere human. Whether or not Dante did it intentionally is subject to debate but one thing is clear in the poem: the misconstrued notion of God is revealed to future generations.

 

References

Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). Dante’s inferno: Seven deadly sins in scientific publishing and how to avoid them. Addiction Science: A Guide for the Perplexed, 267.

Cheney, L. D. G. (2016). Illustrations for Dante’s Inferno: A Comparative Study of Sandro Botticelli, Giovanni Stradano, and Federico Zuccaro. Cultural and Religious Studies4(8), 487.

Verdicchio, M. (2015). Irony and Desire in Dante’s” Inferno” 27. Italica, 285-297.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer