0

Importance of developing your scholarly voice

Published by Lucky at
Categories
Tags

As you have progressed through this course, you have learned the importance of developing your scholarly
voice, you have learned about critical thinking, you have practiced paraphrasing, and you are beginning to
understand the importance of crediting the sources of ideas and of presenting the literature in your own words.
You are still at the early stages of mastering these many skills. Luckily, Walden provides resources and tools to
help you along the way.
For this Assignment, you will familiarize yourself with a tool that can aid you in avoiding plagiarism: SafeAssign.
To prepare for this Assignment:
Review the Academic Integrity resources located in this week’s Learning Resources and consider the different
aspects of plagiarism.
Review the document “How to Read a SafeAssign Originality Report” in this week’s Learning Resources. Also,
the “Classroom Help” feature in the dashboard of this course provides additional information related to
SafeAssign as well as how to read the Originality Report.
In Week 3, you submitted “The Process of Critical Thinking” Assignment and submitted your Assignment to
SafeAssign to generate an originality report. Locate the SafeAssign Originality report you downloaded for this
Assignment.
Review the Similarity Index and the Match Overview.
Review the matches in detail.
The Assignment (1–2 pages):
Describe the SafeAssign Originality report for your Assignment from Week 3:
Provide the Similarity Index.
List the source that constitutes the highest match with your written work.
Explain why a high Similarity Index might not necessarily indicate plagiarism and why a low Similarity Index
does not necessarily indicate a lack of plagiarism.
Based on the review by SafeAssign, what changes would you make to your paper?
Explain how you would use SafeAssign in the future to minimize issues with plagiarism.
As a future psychology professional, explain how academic integrity will impact/influence your academic and
professional practice

Sample Solution

Contention Communities Boundaries Community boundaries can be made anyplace. A few contentions that we guarantee can be seen by looking at the networks we are utilizing to guarantee them. From the logical perspective, the conversation is talked about from the viewpoint of "crowd", "network", "field", or "space" in which it happens (McKerrow, p. Converse with the crowd and the network to clarify the progressing banter. McIlro has four significant networks. It is close to home, social, specialized, and reasoning (Argument Communities # 31 - 39). McKerrow uncovered that everybody can invest energy in just one of the networks one after another (Argument Communities # 29). This implies individuals can move from the network to the network with a similar contention. The start of Kivel's discussion occurred in a social network. Mr. Mckerrow says, "Social conversation ... attempting to change another network of various worth or utilization of old worth, attempting to make another open" (McKerrow # 35) So as to clarify the conversation of the network, it is important to characterize the network itself. "The ordinary guideline of network is to control disputable conduct, social practice is to conclude who can discuss what authority, and they themselves" it is the particular principle that commands the conduct of conversation It is characterized fair and square. In the football match-up, these guidelines intend to make enthusiasts of the network. As a fan, in the event that we need to be a piece of the network, we comprehend that we have to adhere to the standards. A portion of these guidelines may incorporate great sportsmanship. For instance, we may not consent to calls from authorities, yet we realize that we should act here and there to turn into a piece of the network. So we can rehearse conversation by talking about on the telephone, however one thing we need to stop>
GET ANSWER
ACED ESSAYS