“In preparing for the Cherokee removal, state and federal officials were motivated solely by the desire to seize the natives’ land.”

"In preparing for the Cherokee removal, state and federal officials were motivated solely by the desire to seize the natives' land." This prompt is very interesting because it is complex like it shows some of the picture but not all of it. This Thises Statement tells us about what they did in the federal and state officials but it is not the full story of what else happened. Most of the people want to see the Cherokees removed just as much as the officials do. With my own topic, I would focus more on how they felt when The Equal Rights Amendment was going on. I would also focus on the most important things and that would be the reason it took so long and why it took that long. In response to your peers, share any preconceived notions you may have about their topic. Lastly, consider how further exploration of the viewpoints around their topic would potentially change the lens through which they currently view the event.      
  Topic: “In preparing for the Cherokee removal, state and federal officials were motivated solely by the desire to seize the natives’ land.” Thesis Statement: While the desire to acquire Native American land was a significant factor, it is an oversimplification to suggest that state and federal officials were solely motivated by this objective in preparing for the Cherokee removal. Other factors, such as economic interests, political pressures, and racial prejudices, also played a substantial role in shaping their actions. Introduction: The forced removal of the Cherokee Nation from their ancestral lands in the early 19th century, known as the Trail of Tears, remains a dark chapter in American history. It is commonly believed that state and federal officials were driven solely by the desire to seize Native American land. However, a closer examination reveals that their motivations were more multifaceted. While land acquisition was undoubtedly a significant factor, it is crucial to consider other influences that shaped their decisions. Body: Economic Interests: Land acquisition was driven by economic interests, but it was not the sole motivation. The expansion of agriculture and the growth of industries in the early 19th century created a demand for more land and resources. State and federal officials saw the removal of Native American tribes as a means to open up vast territories for settlement and economic development. Furthermore, some officials had personal financial interests in acquiring Native American lands, but this does not discount the fact that other factors also influenced their actions. Political Pressures: State and federal officials faced political pressures from both their constituents and influential interest groups. Settlers, hungry for land and opportunities, pressured their representatives to remove Native American tribes and make way for westward expansion. Politicians who championed Manifest Destiny saw the removal of Native Americans as a way to fulfill their vision of a nation stretching from coast to coast. Racial Prejudices: Racial prejudices against Native Americans were deeply ingrained in American society during this period. Many state and federal officials held biased views that considered Native Americans as inferior and incompatible with civilized society. These racial prejudices influenced decision-making and created a climate that made it easier to justify forced removals. Conclusion: While the desire to seize Native American land was undoubtedly a significant factor in the preparation for the Cherokee removal, it is essential to recognize that state and federal officials were motivated by a combination of economic interests, political pressures, and racial prejudices. By acknowledging these multifaceted motivations, we gain a more nuanced understanding of the events leading up to the Trail of Tears. It is crucial to examine historical events through a comprehensive lens that encompasses all relevant factors to fully comprehend the complexities of our nation’s past.

Sample Answer