1.Select a topic to be taught and identify a target population (family or group) who would benefit from this teaching. State why this is an important topic for target population. (Use references).
- Present the rationale for your choice of topic by assessing the learning needs of the target population. Discuss all of the following: developmental, cognitive, cultural, economic, pathophysiological and educational parameters. Investigate your target group via internet and use other references.
- Develop client-centered behavioral objectives including criteria for measurement (minimum of three).
- Identify and write out an expanded outline of the content to be taught, utilizing the assessment in 2. Cite references as appropriate.
- Identify teaching methodologies (i.e., lecture, demonstration, etc.) that are congruent with the topic to be taught and the client’s needs. State how the methods selected relate to the target population’s developmental, cognitive, educational and/or pathophysiological status. Use references.
- Develop and state the evaluative methods you will use to assist in evaluating the effectiveness of the teaching project. State the relationship of the methods to your target population’s characteristics. Use references.
throughout the lectures in the framework of the course international law ‘agree with and Succession in a Comparative perspective’, I got a first creation on the precept of freedom of testation in South Africa and i found it a very exciting aspect of family regulation which I in no way have been able to examine or discuss earlier than. consequently I wanted to capture the opportunity to paintings on a comparative evaluation of instances on freedom of testation in the Belgian and South African felony systems in which human rights considerations have played a role in restricting or restricting the freedom of testation. quite plenty of educational essays and jurisprudence on freedom of testation and human rights can be determined with reference to the South African felony gadget. There are several floor breaking and exciting instances about discrimination based totally on gender, religion or race and freedom of testation to be found within the case regulation. on this research paper I restricted the jurisprudence to the publish-constitutional length from 1994 onwards. on the contrary it is a great deal tougher to locate Belgian instances wherein human rights issues and freedom of testation are opposed. there may be of path the well-known Belgian case Marckx wherein the eu courtroom of Human Rights determined that there were breaches of article 8 of the eu convention on Human Rights (non-public and circle of relatives life) and article 14 (non-discrimination) and this case played an vital position to induce the Belgian legislator to take away the difference among illegitimate and legitimate youngsters within the law of succession. There are legal provisions in Belgian regulation which can be taken into consideration as limits for the freedom of testation and around these provisions there are a few cases but these limitations are of another kind than the human rights concerns within the South African cases. in an effort to have the opportunity to compare among case law, I supplemented this examine with regulation cases from other jurisdictions like the English and Dutch felony systems. In these systems I could indeed locate some instances wherein freedom of testation has been limited or restricted because of human rights issues. despite the fact that this analysis is best based on a as a substitute small wide variety of instances and therefore I’m prudent to draw hard conclusions of proscribing freedom of testation based on human rights. 1. Freedom of attestation For this studies paper, i will use following definition of freedom of testation: the liberty of people to put off their belongings upon demise as they see fit. Freedom of testation underlies the allocation of someone’s assets upon death, giving the proprietor the proper to designate beneficiaries. 2. Freedom of testation in South African. 2.1 Freedom of testation in South African prison gadget. The precept of freedom of testation is being considered as one of the cornerstones of the law of succession in South Africa is. In segment 25(1) of the South African constitution there is no clear mention of the regulation of succession: no one can be disadvantaged of property besides in phrases of regulation of preferred software, and no law may additionally permit arbitrary deprivation of property. This provision ensures the proper to personal assets and phase 25 need to be study to encompass the right to dispose of an asset. The institution of succession is consequently assured. It lets in people to do away with their assets to whomever they want to. which means testators are free to cast off their belongings in a will in any count they deem essential. A will is the very last expression of what the testator needs to do with his testate and the expressed needs of the testator need to be accomplished.>GET ANSWER