Part I: Combine and align Narrative Therapy Theory, Person-Centered Theory and Solution Focused Theory those three theories into a SINGLE, EFFECTIVE INTEGRATIVE THEORY OF COUNSELING 1. In the paper BRIEFLY discuss why the 3 theories can be integrated or combined for the benefit of clients in general. Specifically address the following points. • How can each of the theories enhance each other? • What strengths does your integrative theory have that are not found in the three theories taken individually. • What aspects of human problems can your integrative theory address? • Address cultural, social and historical trauma issues (e.g. racism, community violence, feminism, spirituality, etc) 2. BRIEFLY discuss how your integrative theory can be described in the following contexts. In your answers treat your integrative theory as a Single Theory of Counseling. • What is mental health and well-being in the context of your theory • What is psychopathology in the context of your theory? • How is positive change brought about by applying your theory • State the diversity/multicultural/gender strengths of the theory, if any • State the diversity/multicultural/gender deficiencies, if any • Limitations of each theory
Part II: Treatment Plan: Carefully read the following brief case example, after which, will follow questions regarding the application of your integrative theory for the benefit of this client. Case Example Sita is 27 years old, of Asian Indian descent, and self-identifies as female. She live in and is currently employed in a major city in the midwest. She was born in the USA and has a bachelor’s degree in marketing, along with a job in that field. She is highly intelligent and is the youngest of 3 children, having 2 older brothers. Her mother and father have both lived in America for 30 years, being originally from Madras in southern India. They are both true to their Hindu background and tradition, as are her brothers, for the most part. Her father is a tenured professor of mathematics at a prominent midwestern university. He and his wife are quite conservative regarding the role of women in the family, believing women to be subservient to men, who are superior. They have made it clear that they desire that Sita marry a successful man of Indian descent. Sita, however, is something of a rebel and is currently dating a Jewish male who is 35 years of age, much to her parents’ dismay. This led to her moving out of her parents’ home and into her own condo one year ago. Sita has largely rejected her Hindu tradition, religion, and culture and is critical of American culture as well. Sita is quite meticulous regarding her appearance and stands 5 feet 5 inches tall, and weighs 125 pounds. She dresses fashionably and has all the outward indicators of being well adjusted and successful. Despite her outwardly prosperous appearance, Sita informs the counselor (you) that she suffers from severe anxiety, and feels that she is all alone, with no one who truly understands her. Her parents, brothers, and boyfriend all try to be supportive, but she says they really don’t “get” her at all. She also reports that her parents are “cold” and not loving. She feels out of place and alienated and cannot escape the feeling that she does not “fit in” and will never be accepted by the people at her place of employment. She says she feels the anxiety at a very deep and disturbing level, and she hopes that someday she will know what it is like to be loved. During her early childhood and middle school years, her father, who is decidedly narcissistic, was particularly critical of her, telling her that she was “strange” and “weird” and a “bad” girl. During high school, he criticized her for many things, from her dress, her morals (which were never really lacking), and her blind acceptance of corrupt American culture. Her mother passively agreed with her father. Currently, Sita has difficulty interacting with superiors at work, especially men. She is also highly insecure, experiencing disturbing anxiety when doing presentations to clients and colleagues during meetings. On a one-to-one basis with clients, however, she is quite competent and effective. She informs the counselor (you) that she has a great desire to ease her anxiety in her everyday life. She says that she has tried self-help methods but none have worked. She says that she is quite unhappy and asks the counselor to help. Treatment Plan Details Using your integrative theory stated in Part I, follow the outline below to put together an effective treatment plan for Sita. Take into account the various aspects of her situation. Follow the instructions below carefully, and use the headings provided. Remember to use your integrative theory as a treatment approach. 1. Diagnosis a. What diagnosis from the DSM V would you assign to Sita? b. State briefly your reasons for this diagnosis. 2. Briefly identify any cultural and gender issues that need to be addressed in therapy with Sita. 3. Goals of treatment a. List at least 3 specific goals for this client based on the above case example, that will meet this person’s needs. b. Identify 3 symptoms or issues that need to be addressed with this client. 4. How would your integrative theory be a match for this client’s needs 5. What kind of therapeutic relationship would be best for this client and how would it help Sita. 6. Briefly state what would be necessary for this client to undergo therapeutic change? 7. Specific techniques a. Name five specific counseling techniques taken from the three theories in your integrative theory that will be especially appropriate to help Sita accomplish the therapeutic goals. b. Add AT LEAST 3 sentences for each technique explaining why and how each technique would help this client.
>History Seven Commandments of Animal Farm Distributed: 23rd March, 2015 Disclaimer: This article has been presented by an understudy. This isn't a case of the work composed by our expert paper scholars. You can see tests of our expert work here. Any suppositions, discoveries, conclusions or suggestions communicated in this material are those of the writers and don't really mirror the perspectives of UK Essays. In George Orwell's Animal Farm which is regarding the matter of the presence of a general public of creatures living on the Manor Farm. One first believes that this novel is about the creatures living in a homestead from the title. In any case, supposedly on, it bit by bit starts to influence the perusers to comprehend the profundity substance of the workings of society in Communist Russia. George has precisely contrasted the general public of human with the creatures to the creatures living in the Manor Farm. In this novel, creator has looked at the Russian upset, where creatures speak to the noteworthy personage and go about as the pioneers in the Russian Community. Creatures are utilized to exhibit the task of the comrade class framework and how the citizens(people) react to this and the impact of the authority by early Russian pioneers, for example, Stalin on the conduct of the general population of Russia. For example, the Old Major makes the discourse to different creatures about the possibility of insurgency. Since he bites the dust before the start of the insurgency, it could be contrasted with the Karl Marx, whose thoughts get to the Communist upheaval under way. The seven edicts are consider as one of the essential advance in the upset which changed by the leaders of the Farm. This paper discusses how the seven rules were modified amid all through the story and whether it mirrors the message of the Communist Manifesto. After the resistance occurred in Manor Farm, it changed to Animal Farm where the arrangement of laws was acquainted with the natives of the ranch by the pioneers. The arrangement of laws which are known as The Seven Commandment are said to be "frame an unalterable law by which all creatures on Animal Farm should live always after."(Orwell) These Commandments were important to the point that they were painted by Snowball and Squealer "in mammoth white letters that could be perused from thirty yards away."(Orwell) The first Seven Commandments kept running as: Whatever goes upon two legs is a foe. Whatever goes upon four legs or has wings, is a companion. No creature should rest in a bed No creature should drink liquor. No creature might murder other creature. No creature might wear garments. All creatures are equivalent. These precepts were to be trailed by every one of the creatures living on the homestead consistently notwithstanding. As one can think from the perusing, the most straightforward expression that clarifies these edicts is "Four legs great, two legs terrible." As time cruised by, the rules were changed by the leaders of the homestead. Napoleon (the pig who rises as the pioneer of Animal Farm after resistance) who shrewdly broke the decree and reintroduced as "four legs great, two legs are better" Even however the initial two decrees express that anybody on two legs is terrible and ought not be permitted in the homestead, they were wracked in the primary year. Since the pigs began strolling on two legs, the principal edict was disregarded and more finished, the saint of the Battle of the Cowshed, Snowball transformed into an adversary of the Farm as he was tossed out by Napoleon and permitting exchanging through Mr. Whymper bringing about infringement of edicts . The pigs moved back in to the homestead house which result into change of the principal edicts. The third decree limits creatures of the homestead to rest in the bed which was compelled to change by Napoleon with the adjustment of the charge by including "with sheets." After the defiance occurred in the ranch, the principal precept overruled which was as a rule "all creatures measure up to." As we read through out the story the pigs were continue evolving the "unalterable laws" for their solace simply like we saw above with dozing in the bed. As indicated by Napoleon, mulling over beds is certainly not a noteworthy change yet it was not permitted before since people lived on the ranch considered the bed. The pigs changed the precept so shrewdly that alternate creatures of the ranch didn't think as the infringement of the charge. The following charge to change is "No creature should execute other creature". This happens not long after the admissions and executions of creatures on the homestead that were gathered backstabbers and allied with Snowball. After these executions, again Muriel, Clover and furthermore Benjamin in addition to some different creatures felt this did not square with this charge. By and by, the pigs have changed the Commandments with a specific end goal to legitimize their activities. The creatures read the Commandment they however did not concur, "No creature should execute other creature without cause", and afterward the creatures perceive how extremely the Commandments had not been disregarded. The following decree to change is when Napoleon manhandle his energy and made life harder for different creatures. The pigs force more control while holding benefits for themselves. Squealer legitimizes each announcement Napoleon makes, even the pigs' modification of the Seven Commandments of Animalism. "No creature might drink liquor" is changed to "No creature should drink liquor to overabundance" when the pigs find the agriculturist's whisky. One could never feel that pigs at any point rolled out improvement to the decree about the garments as they were sufficient intense to govern different creatures. The seventh decree clarifies that all creatures on the planet are dealt with similarly without refinement. Rather than thinking about the edicts as "unalterable laws," they were supplanted by useless motto "All creatures are equivalent, yet some are more equivalent than others," which is absolutely inverse to with what they were acquainted with different creatures. Orwell has utilized pictures to make his contention more grounded. He has utilized occasions to assist perusers with understanding his considerations. While understanding, we build up a sentiment of trouble inside getting join sincerely to the story. Orwell writes in an approach to targets perusers feelings since they can involvement and feel the agony endured by the creatures in the homestead. The accompanying scene could make a solid distress to the perusers "So Napoleon, with the assistance of his pooches, butchers any individual who is said to be backstabbing. The story of admissions and executions went ahead, until there was a heap of cadavers lying before Napoleon's feet and the air was overwhelming with the scent of blood, which had been obscure there since the ejection of Jones." To finish it off, Napoleon outlaws Beasts of England, which had filled in as one of the main residual ties between Animal Farm and old Major?" (Orwell 65). Taking everything into account, obviously George Orwell expected his novel to symbolically speak to the figures and occasions of the Russian Revolution, and through the characters of Mr. Jones as Czar Nicholas, Old Major as Karl Marx, and Napoleon as Joseph Stalin, Animal Farm puts forth a significant expression in regards to the manhandle of energy. The creatures started their upset with the best aims. Be that as it may, their honorable thoughts of an idealistic culture where "all creatures are made equivalent" step by step crumbled into a totalitarian state with a coldblooded and out of line despot which, obviously, mirrors the chain of occasions that transformed Marx's fantasy of a ridiculous society into the bad dream of Stalin's heartless administration. This abhorrent cycle of disobedience, power, and afterward debasement is best portrayed by Barbara Tuchman: "Each effective upset places on in time the robes of the despot it has ousted.">GET ANSWER