For what purposes and how do intergovernmental institutions engage with non-state actors, including militant groups and civil society organizations, in Jordan, Lebanon, and Syria since 1967? What best explains variations in their ability to achieve their

Brief introduction, including the thesis statement.
In practice, you should write the introduction last, once you know what the rest of the paper says. So for the purposes of this exercise, simply include the thesis statement.
Brief literature review
This tells the reader what are the relevant bits of IR theory that your paper contributes to. You can draw on IR textbooks, handbooks or encyclopedias of political science/IR, or the Annual Review of Political Science, for concise statements of the state of the field.
For example, is your question about identity and foreign policy? What are the main current theories in that area relevant to answering it?
Ian Boucher can help you a lot here if you can’t find relevant reference works.
Brief essential background
Keep it short. What does your reader need to know about the historical and other context of your question?
Data
This is the largest part of your paper. You should arrange this in subsections, as you present the information needed to answer your question.
Data are observations of the world. They may take the form of numerical information, but don’t have to. Most likely, in the type of papers you are writing they will take the form of information you take from scholarly, official, and journalistic sources that allow you to answer your question.
Here it is essential to make sure you are gathering and presenting information that allows you to answer all parts of your question.
Analysis
Based on the data you have presented, what can you now say is the answer to your question? Here you present your reasoning.
Brief conclusion and, optionally, implications
Implications are where you extrapolate from what you have found to make broader arguments. For example, does your answer allow you to make predictions about the future of the case(s) you studied? Does it help explain a broader universe of cases than the specific ones you looked at? Does it suggest certain policy directions for regional or other powers?

Sample Answer

Sample Answer

 

 

Thesis Statement

Intergovernmental institutions engage with non-state actors, including militant groups and civil society organizations, in Jordan, Lebanon, and Syria since 1967 for various purposes such as conflict resolution, humanitarian aid delivery, and peacebuilding. The variations in their ability to achieve their objectives can be best explained by factors such as the nature of the conflict, the level of cooperation among state and non-state actors, and the presence of external influences.

Brief Literature Review

The study contributes to the field of International Relations by examining the dynamics of intergovernmental institutions’ interactions with non-state actors in conflict-affected regions. Drawing on theories of conflict resolution, peacebuilding, and non-state actor engagement, the research aims to shed light on the complexities of these relationships and their impact on regional stability.

Brief Essential Background

Since 1967, Jordan, Lebanon, and Syria have been embroiled in various conflicts and political upheavals, leading to the involvement of multiple non-state actors alongside intergovernmental institutions. The historical context of these regions provides insight into the complexities of state-non-state actor interactions and their implications for peace and stability.

Data

1. Purpose of Engagement: Analyzing the objectives behind intergovernmental institutions’ engagement with non-state actors in Jordan, Lebanon, and Syria.
2. Types of Non-State Actors: Identifying the various non-state actors involved, including militant groups and civil society organizations.
3. Nature of Cooperation: Examining the level of cooperation and coordination between state and non-state actors in conflict resolution efforts.
4. Effectiveness of Engagement: Assessing the success or failure of intergovernmental institutions in achieving their goals through engagement with non-state actors.

Analysis

Based on the data presented, the variations in intergovernmental institutions’ ability to achieve their objectives can be attributed to several key factors. The nature of the conflict, including its complexity and intensity, plays a significant role in determining the success of engagement strategies. Additionally, the level of cooperation among state and non-state actors, as well as the influence of external actors on the dynamics of conflict resolution efforts, also impact outcomes.

Brief Conclusion and Implications

In conclusion, the engagement of intergovernmental institutions with non-state actors in Jordan, Lebanon, and Syria since 1967 reflects a complex interplay of factors that influence the effectiveness of conflict resolution and peacebuilding efforts. By understanding these dynamics and addressing the underlying challenges, policymakers and stakeholders can work towards more sustainable peace agreements and stability in the region. The implications extend beyond these specific cases to inform broader strategies for engaging with non-state actors in conflict-affected regions worldwide.

 

 

This question has been answered.

Get Answer