Explain clearly Japan’s consensus approach to decision-making, ringisho. How does the ringisho practice reflect Japan’s distinctive group cultural values or characteristics such as the emphasis on wa, “combining droplets or energies,” the importance of and responsibility to the group (including the value of amae)? What roles do tatemae and honne play in that regard? And how is the ringisho practice more fitting to a culture of introversion that is at the same time high context with high uncertainty avoidance and long-term time orientation? On the other hand, how does this practice help moderate their power distance in an otherwise highly status-conscious society? (Japan is just ranked middle in terms of Hofstede’s power distance.) How is the ringisho practice different from the American practice of huddling? How does the American practice reflect a different set of cultural values and characteristics? And how is huddling more fitting to our culture of extroversion that is at the same time low context with low uncertainty avoidance and short-term time orientation? In connection with what you have discussed above especially ringisho, in what ways do you think we could learn from the Japanese, especially in connection with how companies make business decisions?
The review of saving money organizations assumes an imperative part in India as it manage the saving money organizations in right way. In review of banks incorporates different sorts of review which are ordinarily completed in saving money organizations, for example, statutory review, income/wage use review, simultaneous review, PC and framework review and so on the above review is principally directed by the banks own staff or outside reviewer. Be that as it may, the tenets and the regulation identifying with the behavior of different sorts of review or assessments vary from a bank to bank expect the statutory review for which the RBI rules is pertinent. In this, I have given more significance on the general bank review framework. In today’s focused world review is all that much vital and in addition obligatory , in light of the fact that speculator contributing choice is rely on upon that specific idea if evaluator has communicating his perspective about specific association is genuine and reasonable then financial specialist can get his thoughts regarding the amount he ought to put resources into specific organizations. ORIGIN AND EVOLUATION OF AUDITING 1) Origin of term : The term review is gotten from the Latin expression “audire” intend to listen. In right on time days, an evaluator used to leaning to the record read out by the bookkeeper keeping in mind the end goal to check them. 2) Ancient origin : Examining is as old as bookkeeping. It was being used in every single old countrie, for example, Mesopotamia, Egypt, Greece, Rome, U.K., and India. The Vedas,Ramayana, Mahabharata contain references to bookkeeping and inspecting. Arthashasastra by Kautilya gives nitty gritty principles for bookkeeping and evaluating of open accounts. The Mauryas, the Guptas and the Mughals had created and bookkeeping and evaluating framework to control state accounts. In this manner, fundamentally, bookkeeping and examining had their starting point i>GET ANSWER