What is a critique? A critique is NOT a “book report.” It exceeds summarizing the content of a book in that it provides a critical estimate of the work. In part, this may depend upon comparing the work with accepted standards, but also demands a personal critical response on the part of the reviewer to the work of the author. Practice in such critical analysis of material read will aid the reviewer in becoming a more discerning consumer of ideas and professional writings.
Outline for a Critique A written critique should include these four essential areas: a. Identification of the material read; Simply use title of article and authors name. b. Abstract of the major ideas of the work (1) The research problem, the methods of research, and the major findings. (2) Analyze the work to identify the major idea(s)/concepts of the author.Specifically identify the major play concepts of the work. (3) Find the conclusion(s) and recommendations, paying special attention to the issues and problems involved.
Critical Evaluation of major ideas: What terms did the author define? What were the author’s definitions clear)? What are the author’s conclusions? Examine the logic supporting the author’s offered and the conclusions reached? Has the author substantiated the ideas through logical reasoning; flawless? Were the supporting arguments adequate? Were the premises such that any person would have logically ceded to them?
Implications: either from ideas given in this author’s work or from ideas developed on your own in the critical response to this article, what, then will be the implications of this work?
US Constitutional Policy for Privacy Disclaimer: This work has been put together by an understudy. This isn't a case of the work composed by our expert scholastic authors. You can see tests of our expert work here. Any assessments, discoveries, ends or proposals communicated in this material are those of the writers and don't really mirror the perspectives of UK Essays. Distributed: Wed, 11 Jul 2018 Instance of Reading Weeks v. the United States The primary issue for the situation The primary issue, for this situation, was that private property was not to be meddled with except if there was a guarantee and if not it was taken as illicit as per the Fourth Amendment. The security officers refused from meddling with proof in the event that it is traversed illicit means or undertaking unlawful pursuits. Point of reference or Laws utilized by the court to arrive at its definitive decision The court embraced the case dependent on the Fourth Amendment to accomplish its decision. Under this Amendment according to the United States Constitution, the security officers and the government court are confined from undertaking cases which included proof which was taken from suspects illicitly or through outlandish ventures. All inquiries and captures are to be issued a guarantee to be named as lawful according to the law (Vile, 2013). How the court connected the law to the actualities of the case The court needed to arrange for his property which included papers and articles returned and he was sans left on the grounds that the cops who embraced the look had no guarantee for the pursuit. Under the Fourth Amendment, he was secured by the law and his property was returned. End This case assumed a major job in guaranteeing that private properties are taken care of lawfully and every one of the privileges of people are not abused and subsequently enhancing value. Silverthorne Lumber Company, Inc., Et Al. v. Joined States The primary issue for this situation The primary issue, for this situation, was to guarantee that any proof which is gotten by getting reports from private property without an allow to be taken as illicit. Point of reference or Laws utilized by the court to arrive at its definitive decision The court utilized the exclusionary rule and the Fourth Amendment dependent on the constitution, which says that the proof accomplished without an allow from a suspect is unlawful. The sacred rights must be ensured for the situation as so the case was expelled in light of the fact that the duty papers duplicates were gotten without an allow (Cruft, 2015). How the court connected the law to the actualities of the case The duty records were replicated by the government operators without the allow and according to the law this records were along these lines seen as not flawless and meddled with. The court connected this standard as this prompted getting rid of the case.>GET ANSWER