Should judges be bound by the purpose of a law when they interpret it?
Discuss this with reference to Hart’s and Fuller’s accounts of adjudication.
Develop a well-reasoned and well-researched argument that explicitly targets the important issues and takes a position.
Fairly characterise and then critically address counter-argument.
Logically appeal to academic argument in support of the paper’s thesis, providing sufficient context and significant analysis.
Prioritise relevant materials and arguments, demonstrating a good structural balance.
Write in cogent, complete sentences, with impeccable spelling, grammar, and syntax; avoid passive voice, throat-clearing or redundant language, and nominalisations.
Exhibit the one paragraph to one argument rule.
Contain a clear Introduction and Conclusion that orientate a reader to the argument, essay’s structure, and conclusion.
