Under the just-in-time II (HT II) system developed by Bose Corporation, the supplier pro-vides an in-plant person who resides in Bose’s facility. The in-plant representative coordi-nates the placement of orders from Bose with his company and does concurrent planning and adjusts order deliveries to serve Bose’s demands. In turn, Bose provides an evergreen contract that lasts for a period of time (e.g., four years), requires some price reductions, and permits the in-plant personnel to participate in product design, material selection, and access to all Bose personnel and meetings.
Bose has used HT II for a number of products. Note that under HT, suppliers still get fore-casts and have to use those forecasts to make decisions. However, forecasts are imprecise, often off by 10% to 15%, which requires suppliers to scramble. JIT II takes the next step from JIT by permitting in-plant personnel and hence suppliers to have an idea of demand trends before the orders are placed. An in-plant from a supplier of plastic components suggests that under JIT II he be allowed to see demand data and have the flexibility to adjust shipment timings and quantity so that the supplier production runs are efficient. He can also build up inventory in anticipation of other orders to his manufacturing system. This concurrent planning is a major source of benefits for this supplier.
An in-plant from a transportation provider claims that her terminals at Bose permit infor-mation to replace Bose inventory. Knowing when the deliveries are expected allows Bose to reliably use in-transit inventory to satisfy production demand so that the company can operate with low physical inventories. Also the transport company can possibly gain work from Bose’s suppliers and customers. About 65% of Bose’s customers are located outside the United States. An in-plant import and export specialist at Bose has data regarding order shipments and deliveries. Quick and timely access to information enables him to manage the international shipping operations and plan and react to contingencies. An in-plant from a printing company works with orders from Bose’s departments and coordinates the order placement, scheduling, and receipt between Bose departments to minimize overhead costs. Fixed prices reduce any need for Bose personnel. Bose’s senior management believes that JIT II enables Bose to have control without invest-ing in vertically integrated assets. 2a. Provide a 4C Supply Chain Audit of this case. 2b. How does in II help the supplier? What tradeoffs does the supplier have to consider in choosing whether or not to be involved in JIT H with Bose? 2c. How does JIT II help Bose?

 

 

 

Sample Answer

Sample Answer

 

Just-in-Time II (JIT II) System at Bose Corporation: A Supply Chain Analysis

4C Supply Chain Audit:

Customer:

– Bose Corporation
– Suppliers providing in-plant personnel
– Transportation provider
– Import and export specialist
– Printing company

Competitor:

– Potential competitors in the industry that may adopt similar supply chain strategies in the future

Collaboration:

– Close collaboration between Bose and its suppliers, transportation provider, import and export specialist, and printing company
– In-plant personnel involved in concurrent planning, adjusting order deliveries, and participating in product design and material selection
– Evergreen contracts with suppliers for a period of time, requiring price reductions and permitting supplier involvement in various aspects of Bose’s operations

Cost:

– Potential cost savings for Bose through reduced inventory levels, efficient production runs, and minimized overhead costs
– Investments required by suppliers to adjust their production runs based on demand trends provided by Bose

How JIT II Helps the Supplier:

– Improved Planning: Suppliers have visibility into demand trends before orders are placed, allowing for better planning and adjustment of shipment timings and quantities to optimize production runs.
– Efficient Inventory Management: Concurrent planning enables suppliers to build up inventory in anticipation of other orders, leading to efficient utilization of manufacturing systems.
– Business Opportunities: Suppliers can gain work from Bose’s suppliers and customers, potentially expanding their business opportunities.

Tradeoffs for Suppliers in Choosing JIT II with Bose:

– Investment: Suppliers may need to invest in systems and processes to align with Bose’s JIT II requirements.
– Flexibility: While concurrent planning offers benefits, it may require suppliers to be more responsive to demand fluctuations and adjust production accordingly.
– Dependence: Suppliers may become more dependent on Bose’s demand data and operations, which could impact their autonomy and decision-making processes.

How JIT II Helps Bose:

– Control without Vertical Integration: JIT II enables Bose to maintain control over its supply chain operations without investing in vertically integrated assets.
– Efficient Operations: Access to real-time information from in-plant personnel allows Bose to manage inventory levels effectively, reduce physical inventories, and operate with low overhead costs.
– International Shipping Operations: JIT II facilitates efficient management of international shipping operations, enabling timely responses to contingencies and ensuring smooth order shipments and deliveries.

In conclusion, the JIT II system at Bose Corporation exemplifies a collaborative supply chain model that benefits both the company and its suppliers through improved planning, efficient inventory management, and cost savings. While suppliers may need to consider tradeoffs such as investments and flexibility, the overall impact of JIT II on both parties is enhanced operational efficiency, better responsiveness to demand fluctuations, and strengthened business relationships.

 

This question has been answered.

Get Answer