There are some reasons that the use of the atomic bombs can be justified. Without them it is possible wwii would have continued longer and caused more deaths both American and Asian. while it is true many Japanese suffered greatly due to the bombs the bombs may have unltimately been necessary.
Was the use of atomic bombs justified?

Sample solution

Dante Alighieri played a critical role in the literature world through his poem Divine Comedy that was written in the 14th century. The poem contains Inferno, Purgatorio, and Paradiso. The Inferno is a description of the nine circles of torment that are found on the earth. It depicts the realms of the people that have gone against the spiritual values and who, instead, have chosen bestial appetite, violence, or fraud and malice. The nine circles of hell are limbo, lust, gluttony, greed and wrath. Others are heresy, violence, fraud, and treachery. The purpose of this paper is to examine the Dante’s Inferno in the perspective of its portrayal of God’s image and the justification of hell. 

In this epic poem, God is portrayed as a super being guilty of multiple weaknesses including being egotistic, unjust, and hypocritical. Dante, in this poem, depicts God as being more human than divine by challenging God’s omnipotence. Additionally, the manner in which Dante describes Hell is in full contradiction to the morals of God as written in the Bible. When god arranges Hell to flatter Himself, He commits egotism, a sin that is common among human beings (Cheney, 2016). The weakness is depicted in Limbo and on the Gate of Hell where, for instance, God sends those who do not worship Him to Hell. This implies that failure to worship Him is a sin.

God is also depicted as lacking justice in His actions thus removing the godly image. The injustice is portrayed by the manner in which the sodomites and opportunists are treated. The opportunists are subjected to banner chasing in their lives after death followed by being stung by insects and maggots. They are known to having done neither good nor bad during their lifetimes and, therefore, justice could have demanded that they be granted a neutral punishment having lived a neutral life. The sodomites are also punished unfairly by God when Brunetto Lattini is condemned to hell despite being a good leader (Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). While he commited sodomy, God chooses to ignore all the other good deeds that Brunetto did.

Finally, God is also portrayed as being hypocritical in His actions, a sin that further diminishes His godliness and makes Him more human. A case in point is when God condemns the sin of egotism and goes ahead to commit it repeatedly. Proverbs 29:23 states that “arrogance will bring your downfall, but if you are humble, you will be respected.” When Slattery condemns Dante’s human state as being weak, doubtful, and limited, he is proving God’s hypocrisy because He is also human (Verdicchio, 2015). The actions of God in Hell as portrayed by Dante are inconsistent with the Biblical literature. Both Dante and God are prone to making mistakes, something common among human beings thus making God more human.

To wrap it up, Dante portrays God is more human since He commits the same sins that humans commit: egotism, hypocrisy, and injustice. Hell is justified as being a destination for victims of the mistakes committed by God. The Hell is presented as being a totally different place as compared to what is written about it in the Bible. As a result, reading through the text gives an image of God who is prone to the very mistakes common to humans thus ripping Him off His lofty status of divine and, instead, making Him a mere human. Whether or not Dante did it intentionally is subject to debate but one thing is clear in the poem: the misconstrued notion of God is revealed to future generations.

 

References

Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). Dante’s inferno: Seven deadly sins in scientific publishing and how to avoid them. Addiction Science: A Guide for the Perplexed, 267.

Cheney, L. D. G. (2016). Illustrations for Dante’s Inferno: A Comparative Study of Sandro Botticelli, Giovanni Stradano, and Federico Zuccaro. Cultural and Religious Studies4(8), 487.

Verdicchio, M. (2015). Irony and Desire in Dante’s” Inferno” 27. Italica, 285-297.

Sample Answer

Sample Answer

 

Justification of the Use of Atomic Bombs in World War II

Introduction

The use of atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki during World War II remains a highly controversial and debated topic. While the devastation caused by these bombings cannot be understated, there are arguments that the use of atomic bombs was justified due to the potential alternative scenarios that could have unfolded had they not been deployed.

Thesis Statement

The use of atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki can be justified based on the belief that it helped to hasten the end of World War II, potentially saving more lives in the long run.

Ending the War

One of the primary arguments in favor of the use of atomic bombs is that it played a significant role in bringing about the end of World War II. By demonstrating the immense destructive power of nuclear weapons, the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki compelled Japan to surrender, thus avoiding the need for a prolonged and costly invasion of the Japanese mainland.

Saving Lives

Another justification for the use of atomic bombs is the belief that it ultimately saved lives. While it is true that many Japanese civilians suffered greatly as a result of the bombings, it is also argued that a prolonged war would have led to even greater loss of life, both American and Asian, through continued battles, bombings, and starvation.

Psychological Impact

The psychological impact of the atomic bombings on Japan cannot be overlooked. The shock and horror of witnessing the devastation caused by these weapons may have played a crucial role in convincing Japanese leadership to surrender, thus averting further bloodshed and destruction.

Alternative Scenarios

It is important to consider the alternative scenarios that could have unfolded had the atomic bombs not been used. A prolonged war could have resulted in more casualties, both military and civilian, as well as greater destruction and suffering on all sides involved in the conflict.

Ethical Considerations

While the use of atomic bombs raises ethical concerns about the targeting of civilians and the long-term consequences of nuclear warfare, it is essential to analyze these events in the context of the extreme circumstances and decisions faced by leaders during wartime.

Conclusion

In conclusion, while the use of atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki remains a contentious issue, there are arguments to suggest that it was justified in bringing about the end of World War II and potentially saving lives in the process. By considering the historical context, strategic implications, and ethical dilemmas surrounding this decision, we can gain a more nuanced understanding of the complex factors at play during this critical moment in history.

 

 

This question has been answered.

Get Answer