ents on vote based system should be comprehended against the previous foundation and furthermore to be considered with regards to his general portrayal of "right" and "debased" constitutions. A constitution (politeia), to him is a method for sorting out the workplaces of the city-state and characterizing the administering body. The contrast between right types of governments and distorted ones is that in the previous, the end (telos) of government is to control for the benefit of all of the residents, while in a debased type of government, the telos is to empower the governors to profit by the administration. He records three "right" constitutions: majesty, privileged and commonwealth, which incorporate the standard of the one, a couple and numerous to benefit people in general. On the other hand, there are three "debased" constitutions which veer off from these: oppression emerges when the ruler rules for his own advantage; government results from gentry when the men of means rule for their own favorable position; and majority rules system emerges from nation when the poor principle to their greatest advantage. Out of these debased types of government, oppression is the most noticeably awful, at that point theocracy pursued by majority rule government, which is the least terrible on the grounds that it is the most moderate. Aristotle considered majority rules system to be signifying the standard of the demos or average citizens to their greatest advantage. Another point on which Aristotle sensibly demands is that the genuine differentiation, found actually, among government and popular government isn't that between rule of the couple of and rule of the numerous yet between sway of the rich and power of the poor .>