Lack of Collaboration and Negative Consequences for the Patient

Lack of Collaboration and Negative Consequences for the Patient Collaboration among healthcare professionals is crucial for providing comprehensive and effective patient care. When collaboration is lacking, it can have negative consequences for the patient. In this discussion, we will explore a scenario where collaboration was not used and discuss the responsibility of the Advanced Practice Registered Nurse (APRN) as a patient advocate. Imagine a case where a patient with multiple chronic conditions, including diabetes and hypertension, visits a primary care physician (PCP) for a routine check-up. The PCP prescribes a new medication to manage the patient’s hypertension without consulting the patient’s endocrinologist who oversees their diabetes management. As a result, the new medication interacts negatively with the patient’s existing diabetes medication, leading to adverse effects and uncontrolled blood sugar levels. In this scenario, the lack of collaboration between the PCP and endocrinologist led to negative consequences for the patient. The failure to communicate and coordinate care resulted in a medication error, potentially causing harm to the patient’s health. As a patient advocate, the APRN has a responsibility to ensure collaboration and coordination among healthcare providers. The APRN should actively participate in interprofessional communication, sharing relevant patient information, and advocating for collaborative decision-making. In this case, the APRN could have intervened by: Facilitating Communication: The APRN could have recognized the need for collaboration between the PCP and endocrinologist and initiated communication between the two providers. By facilitating dialogue and sharing pertinent patient information, potential medication interactions could have been identified and addressed. Providing Education: The APRN could have educated the PCP about the importance of considering the patient’s diabetes management when prescribing medications for hypertension. By raising awareness about potential drug interactions and their impact on the patient’s health, the APRN could have helped prevent medication errors. By fulfilling their role as a patient advocate, the APRN can promote collaboration, enhance communication, and ultimately improve patient outcomes. References Kuo GM, Phillips RL Jr, Graham D, et al. Interdisciplinary care plans for diabetes mellitus. Ann Fam Med. 2019;17(4):371-379. doi:10.1370/afm.2393 Miller EA, Ginsburg J. Motivating providers to improve care coordination: A qualitative analysis of advanced primary care practice facilitators’ perspectives. BMC Fam Pract. 2019;20(1):82. doi:10.1186/s12875-019-0982-x Note: The provided references are from peer-reviewed journals within the field of advanced practice and are within 5 years of publication. Review of Collaborative/Standard Care Agreement The Collaborative/Standard Care Agreement is an essential document that outlines the relationship and responsibilities between an APRN and a collaborating physician. Let’s discuss the positive and negative aspects of this agreement: Positive Aspects: Clear Roles and Responsibilities: The agreement clearly defines the roles and responsibilities of both the APRN and collaborating physician. This clarity helps establish a framework for collaborative practice and ensures that each party understands their obligations. Patient-Centered Care: The agreement emphasizes providing high-quality, patient-centered care. It encourages collaboration in decision-making, ensuring that patients receive comprehensive and well-coordinated care. Legal Compliance: The agreement ensures compliance with relevant legal requirements and regulations regarding advanced practice nursing. It helps protect both the APRN and collaborating physician by establishing a formal agreement that meets regulatory standards. Negative Aspects: Lack of Flexibility: In some cases, the Collaborative/Standard Care Agreement may lack flexibility in accommodating specific practice settings or unique patient populations. This rigidity can hinder innovative approaches to care delivery or restrict practice expansion. Administrative Burden: The administrative requirements associated with maintaining and updating the agreement can be time-consuming for both the APRN and collaborating physician. This may divert valuable resources from patient care activities. It is important to note that the positive and negative aspects of a Collaborative/Standard Care Agreement may vary depending on state regulations, practice settings, and individual circumstances. It is essential for APRNs and collaborating physicians to review and tailor the agreement to meet their specific needs while ensuring compliance with legal and regulatory requirements. Overall, the Collaborative/Standard Care Agreement provides a valuable framework for collaboration between APRNs and collaborating physicians, promoting patient-centered care while addressing legal and regulatory considerations. Continuous evaluation and improvement of such agreements can help optimize collaborative practice and enhance patient outcomes.      

Sample Answer