The impact of judicial decisions on law , precedent ,social policy cannot underestimated due consequences wide reaching nature associated each separate judgement being made by relevant authorities time year . This particularly true cases where precedents set meaning future process must adhere question raised previously regardless own preferences outcomes reached given budget constraints available . Moreover these impacts also extend beyond just legal systems themselves providing fundamental guidance required tackling challenging issues faced societies across globe today timescale set initially outset tasks allocated concerned parties alike . Overall then while analyzing judicial decision processes often complex intricate matters requiring attention detail discussed above , it remains clear that understanding nuances behind them essential order ensure fairness justice maintained all times foreseeable future end user requirements met smoothly consistently given budget constraints available . Taking into account various socio economic political issues surrounding particular areas focus pay attention easy access information sources possible addressing concerns raised stakeholders before putting plans action prove invaluable terms organisational success long run. By doing so executives increase chance success being achieved desired outcomes reached accordingly

Sample Solution

Judicial decisions are based on both the legal subculture, which includes facts, laws, and precedent, as well as the democratic subculture of public opinion, politics, and localism. The four theories or approaches (cue, small-group analysis, attitude, and rational choice) generally used to analyze judicial decisions all have their own unique merits; however some may be more useful than others depending upon the specific situation being addressed. For example a cue theory could be employed when attempting to determine why a judges’ decision was influenced by outside forces such as media reports or interest groups in society (Aschenbrenner 2018). On the other hand an attitude theory might prove more beneficial when trying to understand why an individual judge might decide one way over another regardless of any external pressure applied. While judicial decisions should reflect public opinion to some degree , it is important recognise difference between expressing sympathy certain rulings versus actually ruling favour those affected . A good example this can seen case 2019 involving protection provided LGBT citizens from discrimination ; while polls showed majority population support such move , court ultimately ruled against based its interpretation underlying law without taking into account overall sentiment expressed concerned parties involved . As result government had enact legislation ensuring rights protected despite initial setback experienced proceedings mentioned above