Congratulations! Your boss has just given you the task of helping organize a training for new leaders entering your organization. She mentioned that you will be expecting 10 new employees for the training, and she wants you to be in charge of preparing them for their new roles in leadership. She also added that she hopes you can show them that leadership is more than just management. Based on what you have learned so far in our course, create a training that will help the new leaders understand the difference between leadership and management. Additionally, you will help develop their leadership skills and explain why leadership is important in the organization. Describe at least two exercises you could implement that could help the new leaders develop leadership competencies. Include in your description each training method that you will use (computer-based, traditional, and/or e-learning) and the reason why you chose this method. Also, include what you hope the new leaders will learn from this training.
Part I: Outline: Just finished a century back, the sort of government that existed in these cutting edge western European states was a long ways from what is seen today. The political seismic tremor called the French Revolution had its epicenter in France, however its thunderings were felt through the vast majority of the landmass, and in addition in faraway provinces, leaving the legislative issues of most European nations in a condition of transition. Be that as it may, the expected collect of this insurgency, an annihilation of government and the administer of law, the essential components of a majority rule government, set aside its opportunity to get instilled in the political frameworks of these nations, and developed as a type of government contrastingly in every one of the three nations taken up in this paper. On the off chance that the appearance of Napoleon influenced these three nations, and the Vienna Congress hindered France and Germany's graduation to majority rule government, the inner political progression in every one of these nations were not quite the same as each other's. In Britain, whose brand of popular government was blended, the Reform Acts ended up being turning points headed straight toward vote based system. Such genuine and all around expected strides to popular government were not taken in the other two nations. This is essentially on the grounds that France continued wavering amongst government and absolutism through the majority of the nineteenth century, while Germany was a different state for a large portion of that century. In total, in Britain, before the finish of the nineteenth century, a parliamentary majority rule government, which the country had been having for quite a while, was genuinely settled, albeit under a government. The same was not the situation with the other two; on the whole, Germany delighted at all vote based system. The purposes behind this inconsistency frame the foundation of this paper. Part II: Framework: This paper takes up independently the degree to which majority rule government was introduced into these three nations. In every one of these cases, a portrayal is made of how vote based system created. Since the idea of this paper is diagnostic, a lot of detail isn't made of this viewpoint; this clarification is offered just to strengthen the proposal question. The beginning stage for the advancement of majority rules system in every one of these nations is taken up independently. This is for the basic reason that while the French Revolution occurred in France, such an occasion did not happen in the other two nations. For these, proper verifiably vital dates or occasions are taken up. Part III: Confinement of this investigation: While 1789 might be named a flag occasion for present day vote based system, no occasion of such significance concerning popular government occurred in 1900, the cut off date for this paper. In any case, since this is the period up to which this paper is concerned, it confines itself to advancements in many parts of the nineteenth century, in which the significant topics were unification for Germany, political vulnerability for France, and the change of the parliamentary framework in the Victorian Era for Britain. Part IV: Majority rules system in France: France was home to one of the watershed political occasions of present day Europe, the French Revolution, in which the general population ascended in rebellion with the motto, war to the châteaux, peace to the cabins. The gravity and repercussions of this occasion are extremely incredible to shoulder cliché redundancy; in any case, while the fundamental point of the Revolution was to convey a conclusion to the despotic and awkward administrations that misruled the country, (Frey and Frey, 2004, p. 57) the outcome it tried to ingrain, popular government, did not have a smooth commencement or improvement, either, experiencing a few long and continuing birth strings. Peculiarly, for most piece of the nineteenth century, it appeared as though the immense upset had ended up being close to a disengaged, independent occasion. The profit the Revolution tried to pay, majority rule government, needed to sit tight for an apparently endless timeframe to fructify and get embedded in the country's political framework, on the grounds that the progression of governments it brought were definitely not law based. Driving political figures of the day, for example, Robespierre expected that the framework the unrest set up was one which had an affinity for overlooking "the interests of the general population", would "slip by under the control of degenerate people", and to top it all off, "restore the old oppression" (Cohen, 1997, p. 130) Later decades demonstrated that his anticipation was not far-removed the stamp. The decades following the Revolution saw a chain of occasions, none of which took the nation anyplace close vote based system, the admitted point of the Revolution. The years from the Revolution to the Franco-Prussian War saw political gaps of some kind, which had no similarity of vote based system, beginning with the rising of Napoleon, maybe the most effective despot the nation had ever delivered. His thrashing was trailed by the Restoration of the government; this offered ascend to the Revolution of 1830, and the administer of Louis Philippe, till 1848. It brought another upheaval to cut down his administration, this time in 1848. At last, this proclaimed the period of the Second Republic, and the residency of the flighty Napoleon III, prompting another occasion of original significance for the country, the Franco-Prussian war, to be trailed by yet another Republic, the Third. (Haine, 2000, p. 97) This administration, too vigorously overloaded by castle interests, embarrassments, wars and restored national pride in the wake of an exceedingly energized and resurgent neighbor, Prussia, (Wright, 1916, pp. 2-4) was left with little room or time for vote based system. Nothing of import occurred in the period till the finish of the nineteenth century to require the rise of a majority rule government. Part V: Majority rule government in Germany: Germany's tryst with majority rule government in the nineteenth century should be found in conditions that were particular and one of a kind to the country's history. This was the point at which the German individuals joined as a country out of the blue. They had been a freely weave confederation of regal states that owed its loyalty to the Holy Roman Empire when of the French Revolution; yet, in about an era of this occasion, they had been cobbled together mystically under the Prussian flag. A progression of moves packed with uninhibited daredevilry, bet, trickery and sheer conciliatory shrewdness with respect to its Chancellor, Otto Von Bismarck had joined the German individuals, freeing them of the burden of Austrian mastery of its people groups. (Snell, 1976, pp. 3, 4) However, Germany had just been joined together, bringing about the acknowledgment of an enduring and appreciated dream of a German country; this did not at all imply that a vote based system had been set up. All things considered, the recently sew element did not have the essential preparation for majority rule government, experiencing a fundamental blemish – it "was developed by its rulers, not by its kin. That essential certainty recognized Germany from countries like England, France, and the United States, where the constitutions were composed "with the assent of the represented." The German Empire was an organization of sovereign expresses, its constitution made by a bargain among the innate leaders of those states. The "wars of unification" were not progressive well known developments; they were barely engaged global clashes planned by Bismarck to enable Prussia to dispense with Austrian power inside Germany and to make another Prussian-drove German country inside Europe." (Turk, 1999, pp. xvii-null22) Whatever splashing of vote based system the country had towards the fag end of the century was restricted to social vote based system, in which it was limited to worker's guilds. (Berghahn, 1994, p. 160) Part VI: Majority rule government in Britain: The year 1815 is viewed as a benchmark for the legislative issues of Britain, as it was for a few other European nations, for the straightforward reason that this year saw the finish of the power and impact of one of the best adversaries it at any point saw, Napoleon. Notwithstanding, while this was the real issue for the country remotely, Britain had its offer of inner issues, also, amid this century. The Industrial Revolution got its wake sensational changes which the country needed to ingest, with both the guarantees and the entanglements it brought forth. Among the most critical social impacts the Industrial Revolution had on the country was a close blast in populace, and the downsides of beginning industrialisation, at which it had no trailblazers from any piece of the world. Consequently, the best need around then was an arrangement of strategies that gave the nation social robustness and some component of peace. (McCord, 1991, p. 1) With the high rates of populace development and their chaperon issues, for example, high baby mortality being incredible needs amid the early piece of the nineteenth century, (Brown, 1991, p. 30) the quality of legislative issues was buzzing with the topic of which of the establishments the British had so indefatigably developed over the earlier hundreds of years was most appropriate to offer cognizance to the general public that was changing at a hot pace. In this milieu, the accentuation for British legislative issues was more finished what sort of change was suited and required for the general public, country and the economy, as opposed to which type of government was most appropriate to do these progressions. Supposition was strongly partitioned among the Conservatives and the Liberals about which of its foundations could convey the day for Britain. The enduring British confidence in the government was as firm as ever, not weakening or disintegrating even marginally by virtue of these progressions. (Stop, 1950, pp. 3-5) basically, the nineteenth century, amid whose most part Britain was under the lead of one of its longest-ruling rulers, Queen Victoria, saw the rise of an exceptionally hybridized, yet regularly opposing arrangement of administration. Quintessential popularity based establishments, for example, the parliament, the legal, the bureau and the neighborhood government were fit as a fiddle, however worked under a government. From one viewpoint, reasonable and free races, a definitive identifier of a popular government, were being held with stunning normality; on the other, it couldn't be denied that interest in these decisions was restricted to the modest bunch of rich and powerfu>GET ANSWER