Write a speech about the legalization of divorce in the philippines being practical
Sample solution
Dante Alighieri played a critical role in the literature world through his poem Divine Comedy that was written in the 14th century. The poem contains Inferno, Purgatorio, and Paradiso. The Inferno is a description of the nine circles of torment that are found on the earth. It depicts the realms of the people that have gone against the spiritual values and who, instead, have chosen bestial appetite, violence, or fraud and malice. The nine circles of hell are limbo, lust, gluttony, greed and wrath. Others are heresy, violence, fraud, and treachery. The purpose of this paper is to examine the Dante’s Inferno in the perspective of its portrayal of God’s image and the justification of hell.
In this epic poem, God is portrayed as a super being guilty of multiple weaknesses including being egotistic, unjust, and hypocritical. Dante, in this poem, depicts God as being more human than divine by challenging God’s omnipotence. Additionally, the manner in which Dante describes Hell is in full contradiction to the morals of God as written in the Bible. When god arranges Hell to flatter Himself, He commits egotism, a sin that is common among human beings (Cheney, 2016). The weakness is depicted in Limbo and on the Gate of Hell where, for instance, God sends those who do not worship Him to Hell. This implies that failure to worship Him is a sin.
God is also depicted as lacking justice in His actions thus removing the godly image. The injustice is portrayed by the manner in which the sodomites and opportunists are treated. The opportunists are subjected to banner chasing in their lives after death followed by being stung by insects and maggots. They are known to having done neither good nor bad during their lifetimes and, therefore, justice could have demanded that they be granted a neutral punishment having lived a neutral life. The sodomites are also punished unfairly by God when Brunetto Lattini is condemned to hell despite being a good leader (Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). While he commited sodomy, God chooses to ignore all the other good deeds that Brunetto did.
Finally, God is also portrayed as being hypocritical in His actions, a sin that further diminishes His godliness and makes Him more human. A case in point is when God condemns the sin of egotism and goes ahead to commit it repeatedly. Proverbs 29:23 states that “arrogance will bring your downfall, but if you are humble, you will be respected.” When Slattery condemns Dante’s human state as being weak, doubtful, and limited, he is proving God’s hypocrisy because He is also human (Verdicchio, 2015). The actions of God in Hell as portrayed by Dante are inconsistent with the Biblical literature. Both Dante and God are prone to making mistakes, something common among human beings thus making God more human.
To wrap it up, Dante portrays God is more human since He commits the same sins that humans commit: egotism, hypocrisy, and injustice. Hell is justified as being a destination for victims of the mistakes committed by God. The Hell is presented as being a totally different place as compared to what is written about it in the Bible. As a result, reading through the text gives an image of God who is prone to the very mistakes common to humans thus ripping Him off His lofty status of divine and, instead, making Him a mere human. Whether or not Dante did it intentionally is subject to debate but one thing is clear in the poem: the misconstrued notion of God is revealed to future generations.
References
Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). Dante’s inferno: Seven deadly sins in scientific publishing and how to avoid them. Addiction Science: A Guide for the Perplexed, 267.
Cheney, L. D. G. (2016). Illustrations for Dante’s Inferno: A Comparative Study of Sandro Botticelli, Giovanni Stradano, and Federico Zuccaro. Cultural and Religious Studies, 4(8), 487.
Verdicchio, M. (2015). Irony and Desire in Dante’s” Inferno” 27. Italica, 285-297.
Sample Answer
Sample Answer
Ladies and gentlemen,
Today, I stand before you to discuss a topic that has long been a subject of debate in the Philippines – the legalization of divorce. For many years, divorce has been considered a taboo and contentious issue in our society. However, it is time to have an open and honest conversation about the practicality of legalizing divorce in the Philippines.
First and foremost, let us acknowledge that divorce is not an endorsement of failed marriages or an invitation for recklessness in relationships. It is a recognition that sometimes, despite our best efforts, marriages can become irreconcilable and toxic. By legalizing divorce, we are providing an option for individuals trapped in unhappy and unhealthy marriages to seek a way out and start anew.
One of the most practical reasons for legalizing divorce is that it provides a legal framework for the dissolution of marriages. Currently, couples who want to end their marriage resort to lengthy and expensive legal processes such as annulment or legal separation. These processes often require substantial financial resources and can take years to complete. By legalizing divorce, we can simplify the process, reduce the financial burden, and allow couples to move on with their lives more efficiently.
Moreover, legalizing divorce acknowledges the reality that separation can be the best option for individuals and families in certain circumstances. In cases of abuse, infidelity, or irreconcilable differences, staying in a marriage can be detrimental to the mental, emotional, and even physical well-being of the parties involved. By allowing divorce, we are giving these individuals the opportunity to escape from toxic environments and seek safety and happiness for themselves and their children.
Furthermore, legalizing divorce can have positive social and economic impacts on our society. Research has shown that countries with divorce laws experience a decrease in domestic violence rates. By providing an avenue for individuals to leave abusive relationships, we can protect the vulnerable and prevent further harm. Additionally, divorce can lead to improved economic outcomes for women, who often bear the brunt of financial burdens in failed marriages. It allows them to regain control over their lives, pursue education or career opportunities, and become self-sufficient.
Critics argue that legalizing divorce undermines the sanctity of marriage and traditional family values. However, it is important to recognize that divorce is not a decision taken lightly. It is a last resort after all attempts at reconciliation have been exhausted. Legalizing divorce does not diminish the value of marriage; rather, it acknowledges that not all marriages are meant to last.
In conclusion, legalizing divorce in the Philippines is a practical step towards providing individuals trapped in unhappy and unhealthy marriages with an opportunity for a fresh start. It simplifies the legal process, protects individuals from abusive relationships, improves economic outcomes for women, and promotes a more inclusive and compassionate society. Let us move beyond the stigma and have an open dialogue about this issue. It is time to prioritize the well-being and happiness of our fellow Filipinos by embracing divorce as a practical solution in certain circumstances.
Thank you.
