After reading the required materials attached files from book (Effective Teams : Essentials from Leader to Leader author- Frances Hesselbein)
-L&C Section
-Reading 2
-Reading 3
Summarize the ways in which Lewis and Clark managed teams to achieve their goal(s). Evaluate whether the methods Lewis and Clark used to achieve their goals would be effective today. Why or why not? Discuss the role of managerial courage in Lewis and Clark’s success.
Complete a 1200-word reflection describing the ways Lewis and Clark managed a high-performing team. Support your narrative with additional cited resources as needed.
Submission Requirements
Professional Communication
Essay is written in a professional tone and organized in ways that facilitate reader understanding. Essay includes an introduction and summary paragraph. Sources are cited appropriately using APA guidelines.
Depth of Analysis
Essay applies concepts and theories found in the module as well as additional sources as appropriate. Evidence of critical thinking. Analysis is organized in a logical way.
Sample solution
Dante Alighieri played a critical role in the literature world through his poem Divine Comedy that was written in the 14th century. The poem contains Inferno, Purgatorio, and Paradiso. The Inferno is a description of the nine circles of torment that are found on the earth. It depicts the realms of the people that have gone against the spiritual values and who, instead, have chosen bestial appetite, violence, or fraud and malice. The nine circles of hell are limbo, lust, gluttony, greed and wrath. Others are heresy, violence, fraud, and treachery. The purpose of this paper is to examine the Dante’s Inferno in the perspective of its portrayal of God’s image and the justification of hell.
In this epic poem, God is portrayed as a super being guilty of multiple weaknesses including being egotistic, unjust, and hypocritical. Dante, in this poem, depicts God as being more human than divine by challenging God’s omnipotence. Additionally, the manner in which Dante describes Hell is in full contradiction to the morals of God as written in the Bible. When god arranges Hell to flatter Himself, He commits egotism, a sin that is common among human beings (Cheney, 2016). The weakness is depicted in Limbo and on the Gate of Hell where, for instance, God sends those who do not worship Him to Hell. This implies that failure to worship Him is a sin.
God is also depicted as lacking justice in His actions thus removing the godly image. The injustice is portrayed by the manner in which the sodomites and opportunists are treated. The opportunists are subjected to banner chasing in their lives after death followed by being stung by insects and maggots. They are known to having done neither good nor bad during their lifetimes and, therefore, justice could have demanded that they be granted a neutral punishment having lived a neutral life. The sodomites are also punished unfairly by God when Brunetto Lattini is condemned to hell despite being a good leader (Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). While he commited sodomy, God chooses to ignore all the other good deeds that Brunetto did.
Finally, God is also portrayed as being hypocritical in His actions, a sin that further diminishes His godliness and makes Him more human. A case in point is when God condemns the sin of egotism and goes ahead to commit it repeatedly. Proverbs 29:23 states that “arrogance will bring your downfall, but if you are humble, you will be respected.” When Slattery condemns Dante’s human state as being weak, doubtful, and limited, he is proving God’s hypocrisy because He is also human (Verdicchio, 2015). The actions of God in Hell as portrayed by Dante are inconsistent with the Biblical literature. Both Dante and God are prone to making mistakes, something common among human beings thus making God more human.
To wrap it up, Dante portrays God is more human since He commits the same sins that humans commit: egotism, hypocrisy, and injustice. Hell is justified as being a destination for victims of the mistakes committed by God. The Hell is presented as being a totally different place as compared to what is written about it in the Bible. As a result, reading through the text gives an image of God who is prone to the very mistakes common to humans thus ripping Him off His lofty status of divine and, instead, making Him a mere human. Whether or not Dante did it intentionally is subject to debate but one thing is clear in the poem: the misconstrued notion of God is revealed to future generations.
References
Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). Dante’s inferno: Seven deadly sins in scientific publishing and how to avoid them. Addiction Science: A Guide for the Perplexed, 267.
Cheney, L. D. G. (2016). Illustrations for Dante’s Inferno: A Comparative Study of Sandro Botticelli, Giovanni Stradano, and Federico Zuccaro. Cultural and Religious Studies, 4(8), 487.
Verdicchio, M. (2015). Irony and Desire in Dante’s” Inferno” 27. Italica, 285-297.
Sample Answer
Sample Answer
Lewis and Clark: Managing a High-Performing Team
Introduction
Lewis and Clark’s expedition is renowned for their successful journey to explore the western territories of the United States. This essay explores the ways in which Lewis and Clark managed their team to achieve their goals, evaluates the effectiveness of their methods in today’s context, and discusses the role of managerial courage in their success.
Lewis and Clark’s Team Management
Shared Vision and Clear Goals: Lewis and Clark established a shared vision of exploring and mapping the western territories, with the goal of finding a viable route to the Pacific Ocean. They communicated this vision effectively to their team, ensuring everyone understood and was committed to the mission.
Selection and Recruitment: Lewis and Clark carefully selected team members based on various criteria, such as skills, experience, and character. They sought individuals with diverse expertise, including interpreters, hunters, navigators, and scientists. This deliberate selection process contributed to the overall success of the team.
Effective Communication: Lewis and Clark maintained open lines of communication with their team members. They organized regular meetings to discuss plans, collect information, and address concerns. This ensured that everyone was well-informed and connected, fostering a sense of collaboration and trust within the team.
Delegation and Empowerment: Lewis and Clark delegated responsibilities to their team members based on their strengths and expertise. They recognized the importance of empowering individuals to make decisions within their domain of expertise, which enhanced efficiency and productivity.
Conflict Resolution: Lewis and Clark understood that conflicts were inevitable within a diverse team operating in challenging conditions. They addressed conflicts promptly and encouraged open dialogue to reach resolutions. By valuing differing perspectives, they fostered a culture of mutual respect and cooperation.
Adaptability: Lewis and Clark encountered numerous unforeseen challenges during their expedition, such as harsh terrain, extreme weather conditions, and encounters with Native American tribes. They displayed adaptability by adjusting their plans, seeking guidance from local tribes, and utilizing the expertise of their team members to overcome obstacles.
Evaluation of Methods in Today’s Context
The methods employed by Lewis and Clark to manage their team still hold relevance in today’s context. Here’s why:
Shared Vision: Establishing a shared vision remains crucial in any team or organization. It aligns individuals towards a common purpose, provides clarity, and motivates them to work together towards achieving the goals.
Selection and Recruitment: The careful selection of team members based on skills, experience, and character remains essential today. A diverse team with complementary expertise fosters innovation, creativity, and can better tackle complex challenges.
Effective Communication: Open communication is vital for collaboration, coordination, and ensuring everyone is well-informed. Regular meetings, clear expectations, and transparent information flow contribute to team cohesion and productivity.
Delegation and Empowerment: Empowering team members by delegating responsibilities promotes engagement, ownership, and professional development. It allows individuals to utilize their skills effectively while fostering a sense of trust and autonomy.
Conflict Resolution: Conflicts are inevitable in any team setting. Addressing conflicts openly and constructively is essential for maintaining healthy relationships, resolving issues promptly, and promoting a positive work environment.
Adaptability: In today’s rapidly changing world, adaptability is critical for success. Teams that can quickly adjust strategies, embrace new technologies, and leverage their members’ diverse strengths are better equipped to navigate challenges effectively.
Role of Managerial Courage in Lewis and Clark’s Success
Managerial courage played a significant role in Lewis and Clark’s success as they embarked on their expedition:
Decision-Making: Lewis and Clark had to make tough decisions throughout their journey that could impact the safety and success of their team. They demonstrated the courage to make difficult choices based on available information, even in uncertain circumstances.
Risk-Taking: The expedition involved significant risks, including encounters with hostile tribes, dangerous wildlife, and treacherous terrain. The courage to take calculated risks enabled Lewis and Clark to explore new territories despite the potential dangers.
Overcoming Challenges: Lewis and Clark faced numerous challenges during their expedition that required resilience and determination. Their courage in persevering through adversity inspired their team members to remain committed and motivated.
Advocacy for the Team: Lewis and Clark advocated for their team members’ needs, safety, and well-being when negotiating with Native American tribes or making strategic decisions. They demonstrated courage by standing up for their team in challenging situations.
Conclusion
Lewis and Clark’s management techniques were instrumental in leading a high-performing team during their expedition. Their focus on shared vision, effective communication, delegation, conflict resolution, adaptability, and managerial courage contributed to their success. These methods remain relevant today, emphasizing the importance of these principles in managing teams in various contexts. By learning from Lewis and Clark’s approach, modern leaders can inspire their teams to achieve extraordinary outcomes through effective management strategies.
References:
Hesselbein, F., & Company (Eds.). (2018). Effective Teams: Essentials from Leader to Leader. Jossey-Bass.
[Insert additional references as needed]
