Respond to the following in a minimum of 175 words:
Consider the following scenario:
Your manufacturing company has operated with a mainframe IBM computer for more than 20 years. Recent technological advances have brought opportunities to replace that mainframe-based computing environment with a client/server environment. You have been tasked with responding to the senior management group about the security issues involved with replacing the existing mainframe computer environment with a client/server platform. The salespeople you deal with from each vendor believe that the current mainframe environment costs about $500K a year to maintain from a security standpoint, while a client/server environment would cost about $325K a year. But cost is not the only consideration. No PII or SPII data is contained in this manufacturing platform. It is strictly a final product for sale application.
Outline and review a typical mainframe enterprise security footprint. Do the same for a possible client/server environment. This could include the use of the cloud for distributed computing, but that would also include unique security concerns.
Discuss the following:
Based on your outline, which of these environments is more secure and why?
Does your outline show commonalities that could permit both the mainframe and the client/server environment to coexist from an enterprise security perspective? If so, what are they?
In 100 words, reply to one the discussions below. Be constructive and professional in your responses.
I know that when many computer users think of backups, it’s mainly the fear of data loss. But, going beyond personal loss of data, they don’t always think about protecting themselves from the threat of data theft. There are programs that record keystrokes from a computer session, which are called “key loggers” and it’s surprising how easy civilians can obtain these programs. There hasn’t been much in the way of precedence in the judicial system, but I imagine it could be in some way an invasion of privacy (similar to wire tapping) is a civilian installs it on their computer with the intent to find out what another user of their computer is doing when they are not around.
Based on reaserch i have come to agree that yes the cost of a Clien/Server system can and will save the bussiness large amounts of money. The cost will be cut in half while maintnecee will be slashed as well. Know which enviroment is more secure is the big questions and the answer here is both can have good security featured but in our case we would need to add security software to Clien/Server as we go. Mainframes however have a speacial approach in having speacial kind of security while storing lots more data. Client sevrers and Mainframes can work togethre in the same office and should not be a issue. The only issue with having both Client/server and mainframe is having to pay maintence on both. In all Conclusion i beilve the bussines can work better with Client server but within this time i beileve Mainframe is the best but just a upgrade to the mainframe should do just fine. With the upgrade to the mainframe we will have spent the same amount in purchasing a client/server.
arine protection is the best approach to cover vessels or cargoes in the event of misfortune or harm from the port of starting point until the goal. Marine protection is a sort of protection created in sea area. The principal kinds of marine protection contracts were conceived in Genoa and different nations of Italy around the XVI century. During the nineteenth century Lloyd's London and the Institute of London have created standard statements to use in marine protection likewise called the Institute Clauses. Marine protection is frequently assembled with Aviation and Transit hazards, and known with the abbreviation MAT. The Marine Insurance Act incorporates a standard approach called SG. In 1991, the London market delivered another sort of standard arrangement called Mar 91 with the Institute Clauses. The MAR 91 structure is a general articulation of protection; the Institute Clauses are utilized to set out the detail of the protection spread. Lloyd's of London is made from names that are causing their very own riches in danger to guarantee protection spread. They give spread to vessels, stages and flying machine. Body and Machinery strategy is a sort of constrained spread if there should be an occurrence of blast, fire contact with land transports, airplane, rescue, general normal, productive all out misfortune, complete misfortune, halfway crash risk and with extra premium restricted spread for blasting of boilers and braking of shafts. All types of frame spread must be chosen from a protection specialist. Assurance and reimbursement affiliation give a spread to death toll, contamination and the danger of load for ship-proprietors. In different types of protection to cover vessels can be incorporated war hazard Strike and Freight guard. The financiers are on the whole subject together, however just for their extent of the hazard. On the off chance that one financier should default, the others are not mindful to pick a lot of the case. Spread could be based for voyages and time. Meaning of a P&I club This is a relationship of ship-proprietors who are as one to safeguard each other on a shared non-benefit making premise, for their outsider liabilities. Shared affiliation The P&L club is framed from ship-proprietors which are rivals in the business however they comprehended that it was increasingly invaluable to participate together for protection purposes. As of now the individuals from P&L are universal and various dialects culture religion won't isolated their participation since they are having similar dangers and liabilities. At the end of the day they are various individuals yet with a similar status and same targets. Besides would be better if every one of the individuals from the P&L club have a similar kind of ship, same size, age, cargoes, engaged with a similar exchange, with a similar team. Each ship-proprietor ought to have normal attributes to stay away from out of line circumstances. For instance a ship proprietor with a major tanker should pay in excess of a ship proprietor with a little mass load. Each individual from P&I club shouldn't unreasonably pay the other ship-proprietors. Since the P&L is a no benefit club the individuals need to guarantee one another and attempt to accomplish together ideal productivity in the administration of their cash. The run of the mill marine strategy will cover only three-quarter of the safeguarded's risk towards outsiders. Thus in the nineteenth some ship-proprietor made an endorsing clubs called P&L to protect with every one of the individuals from the club the rest of the part that the run of the mill marine arrangement doesn't cover. These Clubs are still in presence Genuine absolute misfortune and productive all out misfortune ALT (genuine complete misfortune) happens where a ship proprietor has been hopelessly>GET ANSWER