Major Differences between PERT and CPM

  Major Differences between PERT and CPM Project management is an essential aspect of any organization’s operations. Two widely used project management techniques are Program Evaluation and Review Technique (PERT) and Critical Path Method (CPM). While both techniques aim to assist in planning and controlling projects, they have distinct characteristics and applications. This essay will explore the major differences between PERT and CPM, highlighting their unique features and benefits. 1. Definition and Purpose PERT: PERT is a statistical tool used to manage and control complex projects involving uncertain activity durations. It focuses on determining the probability of completing a project within a specified timeframe. CPM: CPM is a deterministic technique that analyzes the sequence of activities in a project to identify the critical path, which determines the shortest possible duration for project completion. 2. Nature of Activities PERT: PERT deals with projects that have a high level of uncertainty regarding activity durations. It is suitable for research and development projects or those involving non-routine tasks where it is difficult to estimate the time required precisely. CPM: CPM is applied when the duration of each activity is known with certainty. It works best for projects with routine tasks and well-defined activity durations. 3. Activity Dependency PERT: PERT uses a probabilistic approach to determine the dependency between activities. The dependency is expressed in terms of optimistic, pessimistic, and most likely durations, considering the inherent uncertainty of each task. CPM: CPM relies on a deterministic approach that assumes a fixed duration for each activity. The dependency between activities is determined based on logical relationships, such as finish-to-start, start-to-start, finish-to-finish, or start-to-finish. 4. Time Estimation PERT: PERT incorporates three time estimates for each activity: optimistic (O), pessimistic (P), and most likely (M). These estimates are then used to calculate the expected duration using the formula: Expected duration (TE) = (O + 4M + P) / 6. CPM: CPM uses a single time estimate for each activity, assuming a fixed duration based on historical data or expert judgment. 5. Critical Path PERT: PERT does not specifically identify a critical path, as it focuses more on determining the probability of completing the project within a given timeframe. CPM: CPM identifies the critical path, which is the sequence of activities that determines the minimum project duration. Any delay on activities within the critical path will directly impact the overall project timeline. 6. Project Control PERT: PERT offers a probabilistic analysis that helps in identifying the activities with the highest risk and allows for contingency planning. It provides insights into the probability of project completion within a specified timeframe. CPM: CPM provides a clear roadmap for project scheduling and control. By identifying the critical path, project managers can allocate resources and track progress more effectively. In conclusion, while both PERT and CPM serve the purpose of project management, they differ significantly in their approaches, application areas, and outcomes. PERT is suitable for projects with uncertain durations and focuses on probabilistic analysis, while CPM is best suited for projects with well-defined activities and deterministic analysis. Understanding these differences will enable project managers to choose the most appropriate technique based on the nature of their projects, leading to better planning, control, and successful completion of projects.

Sample Answer