1.Descnbe with examples how the fells of mythology, sooal psychology socaolOgY and anthrOPOlogy have contributed to the study of organisational behavior.
2. Compare and corniest surface-level and deep-level diversity Pronde examples.
3. Describe the following concepts/Meant:of oenonality: • The Olg 5 Personality Model. – The Dark Triad IMachiavellianism Marciv.nrn and Psychopathy); • Sell-Monitoring: end • Proactive Personality.
4. Compare and contrast the following theories of motivation: a. MaIled; Hierarchy of Needs: b. The Two-factor Theory: and t. Mc(Jellands Theory of Needs
5. Compare and contrast the folloning reinforcement technique,: a. Positive fteinforcornem, b. lEanorejEsbncliOn, c. Punishment; and d Negative PainfOrternent Novo, examples of each from tins, lectures or your own enaerlance
6 Describe Equity Theory and Expectancy Theory, with examplesof how each theory works in business settings.
7. Describe the Ponctuated.EquAbnum Model Give examples
The Geography of European Integration: Economy, Society and Institutions Kourdoumpalou Panagiota Which of the accompanying two sentences will probably be right as you would like to think? Present no less than two contentions to help your supposition. The foundation of a typical money related association in the EU was a fruitful advance towards more profound European joining. The possibility of a typical money related association in EU didn't contemplate all the monetary perspectives bringing about its disappointment a couple of years after the fact. Financial and Monetary Union (EMU) speaks to a noteworthy advance in the reconciliation of EU economies. It includes the coordination of financial and monetary approaches, a typical money related strategy, and a typical cash, the euro. The 28 EU Member States participate in the financial association, however a few nations have taken incorporation further and embraced the euro. The choice to shape an Economic and Monetary Union was taken by the European Council in Maastricht in December 1991, and was later cherished in the Treaty on European Union. The Economic and Monetary Union helps the EU in its procedure of financial combination. Monetary reconciliation brings the advantages of more prominent size, inward effectiveness and vigor to the EU economy in general and to the economies of the individual Member States. This offers open doors for financial strength, higher development and greater business. On January, 1999, 11 of the 115 European Union (EU) nations shaped the Economic and Monetary Union (EMU), embracing the euro as their basic money. From that point forward, in the Eurozone, the European Central Bank does a typical fiscal approach and, to a high degree, security markets are completely coordinated ( European Commission). The production of the Eurozone was gone before by a steady administrative harmonization among European securities exchanges and the consummation of different limitations on out-of-state people, and furthermore by an exertion among EU nations to fulfill the Maastricht criteria for joining the Eurozone. The push to fulfill the Maastricht criteria additionally prompted betterâ€balanced financial spending plans, which may have prompted a "genuine intermingling" of European economies, that is, an expanded synchronization in business cycles over the European economies (Julian Alworth, Giampaolo Arachi, 2008). The presentation of the euro had numerous points of interest. It enhanced straightforwardness, it institutionalized the evaluating in money related markets, and decreased financial specialists' exchange and data costs. At long last, the presentation of a solitary money wiped out the cash chance inside the EU and lessened the general swapping scale introduction of European stocks. This factor, together with the ostensible and genuine intermingling, ought to have prompted more homogeneous valuations of values in EMU nations (Gikas A. Hardouvelis, Dimitrios Malliaropulosa, Richard Priestleyd, 2007). One approach to assess if European securities exchanges turned out to be more coordinated amid the 1990s is to look at the development of the relative impact of EU. At the point when securities exchanges are mostly coordinated, both worldwide and nearby hazard factors are valued. There is a probability of assessing a restrictive resource estimating model with a timeâ€varying level of coordination, which estimates the significance of EU, wide market and money dangers which are in respect to countryâ€specific chance (Gikas A. Hardouvelis, Dimitrios Malliaropulosa, Richard Priestleyd, 2007). Each Eurozone nation has its very own timeâ€varying level of securities exchange joining. The level of mix is limited among zero and solidarity and molded on a wide arrangement of financial, cash, and business cycle factors. These factors gauge the continuous ostensible and genuine union of the European economies amid the preâ€monetary association period. Among the included factors, the most unmistakable one is every nation's forward loan fee differential with Germany which was generally utilized by market examiners as a pointer of the likelihood that an EU nation would in the long run figure out how to join the Eurozone. In the second 50% of the 1990s, the level of reconciliation slowly expanded to the point where individual Eurozone nation securities exchanges have all the earmarks of being completely incorporated into the EU showcase. There have been two principle factors that determined the expansion in the level of mix: the advancement of the likelihood of joining the single cash and the development of swelling differentials (Gikas A. Hardouvelis, Dimitrios Malliaropulosa, Richard Priestleyd, 2007). Besides, financial coordination brought about businessâ€cycle assembly. Crossâ€country return relationships and business cycles are connected. Money related and financial arrangement coordination may have prompted expanded synchronization of business cycles among EMU part nations, which could have prompted expanded relationship of expected corporate income and more homogeneous appraisals of European values (Gikas A. Hardouvelis, Dimitrios Malliaropulosa, Richard Priestleyd, 2007). In the 1990s there is a procedure of expanded mix of European securities exchanges to the possibilities of the arrangement of EMU and the appropriation of the euro as the single cash. Amid the 1990s, the level of reconciliation of every nation's securities exchange with the EU advertise was adversely identified with the two its forward financing cost differential with Germany and its swelling differential with the best three performing nations. Additionally, the expansion differential was a noteworthy marker of whether a nation with a high swelling had the capacity to accomplish ostensible assembly and fulfill a noteworthy model for permission into the Eurozone. The procedure of mix was difficult, yet in the second 50% of the 1990s, securities exchanges united toward full combination. As it were, their normal returns turned out to be progressively dictated by EUâ€wide showcase hazard and less by neighborhood chance (Gikas A. Hardouvelis, Dimitrios Malliaropulosa, Richard Priestleyd, 2007) Closing, supporting proof on the speculation that the possibility of EMU was the reason behind the watched increment in securities exchange incorporation among Eurozone nations originates from two primary sources. To start with, when we watch the involvement in the United Kingdom, an EU nation that decided not to join the Eurozone, is unmistakably unique in relation to whatever is left of the European securities exchanges. The UK showcase hinted at no expanded combination with the EU securities exchange. Second, the combination in Europe gives off an impression of being an Eurozoneâ€specific marvel, which does not depend on conceivable concurrent worldâ€market joining. In this way, now it tends to be said that the foundation of a typical money related association in the EU was a fruitful advance towards the European reconciliation. Clearly the procedure of joining was difficult, yet there was an assembly of the securities exchanges towards full combination. As it were, their normal returns turned out to be progressively controlled by EUâ€wide advertise chance and less by neighborhood chance. References European Commission, Economic and Monetary Union. [online] Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/euro/emu/index_en.htm Gikas A. Hardouvelis, Dimitrios Malliaropulosa, Richard Priestleyd, (2007). The effect of EMU on the value cost of capital. Diary of International Money and Finance Julian Alworth, Giampaolo Arachi, (2008). Tax assessment approach in EMU, Economic Papers 310 1>GET ANSWER