write 1000 words minimum on the classic Theodore Levitt 1960 paper called Marketing Myopia. ‘Marketing myopia’ is a term coined by Theodore Levitt. A business suffers from marketing myopia when a company views marketing strictly from the standpoint of selling a specific product rather than from the standpoint of fulfilling customer needs. This course is customer-centric. This assignment supports your thinking as you prepare your seminar paper on market disruption. As Theodore Levitt states, “Creativity is thinking up new things. Innovation is doing new things.” Five scholarly authored references required, including the Marketing Myopia article.
Sample solution
Dante Alighieri played a critical role in the literature world through his poem Divine Comedy that was written in the 14th century. The poem contains Inferno, Purgatorio, and Paradiso. The Inferno is a description of the nine circles of torment that are found on the earth. It depicts the realms of the people that have gone against the spiritual values and who, instead, have chosen bestial appetite, violence, or fraud and malice. The nine circles of hell are limbo, lust, gluttony, greed and wrath. Others are heresy, violence, fraud, and treachery. The purpose of this paper is to examine the Dante’s Inferno in the perspective of its portrayal of God’s image and the justification of hell.
In this epic poem, God is portrayed as a super being guilty of multiple weaknesses including being egotistic, unjust, and hypocritical. Dante, in this poem, depicts God as being more human than divine by challenging God’s omnipotence. Additionally, the manner in which Dante describes Hell is in full contradiction to the morals of God as written in the Bible. When god arranges Hell to flatter Himself, He commits egotism, a sin that is common among human beings (Cheney, 2016). The weakness is depicted in Limbo and on the Gate of Hell where, for instance, God sends those who do not worship Him to Hell. This implies that failure to worship Him is a sin.
God is also depicted as lacking justice in His actions thus removing the godly image. The injustice is portrayed by the manner in which the sodomites and opportunists are treated. The opportunists are subjected to banner chasing in their lives after death followed by being stung by insects and maggots. They are known to having done neither good nor bad during their lifetimes and, therefore, justice could have demanded that they be granted a neutral punishment having lived a neutral life. The sodomites are also punished unfairly by God when Brunetto Lattini is condemned to hell despite being a good leader (Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). While he commited sodomy, God chooses to ignore all the other good deeds that Brunetto did.
Finally, God is also portrayed as being hypocritical in His actions, a sin that further diminishes His godliness and makes Him more human. A case in point is when God condemns the sin of egotism and goes ahead to commit it repeatedly. Proverbs 29:23 states that “arrogance will bring your downfall, but if you are humble, you will be respected.” When Slattery condemns Dante’s human state as being weak, doubtful, and limited, he is proving God’s hypocrisy because He is also human (Verdicchio, 2015). The actions of God in Hell as portrayed by Dante are inconsistent with the Biblical literature. Both Dante and God are prone to making mistakes, something common among human beings thus making God more human.
To wrap it up, Dante portrays God is more human since He commits the same sins that humans commit: egotism, hypocrisy, and injustice. Hell is justified as being a destination for victims of the mistakes committed by God. The Hell is presented as being a totally different place as compared to what is written about it in the Bible. As a result, reading through the text gives an image of God who is prone to the very mistakes common to humans thus ripping Him off His lofty status of divine and, instead, making Him a mere human. Whether or not Dante did it intentionally is subject to debate but one thing is clear in the poem: the misconstrued notion of God is revealed to future generations.
References
Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). Dante’s inferno: Seven deadly sins in scientific publishing and how to avoid them. Addiction Science: A Guide for the Perplexed, 267.
Cheney, L. D. G. (2016). Illustrations for Dante’s Inferno: A Comparative Study of Sandro Botticelli, Giovanni Stradano, and Federico Zuccaro. Cultural and Religious Studies, 4(8), 487.
Verdicchio, M. (2015). Irony and Desire in Dante’s” Inferno” 27. Italica, 285-297.
Sample Answer
Sample Answer
Marketing Myopia: A Perspective on Fulfilling Customer Needs
In 1960, Theodore Levitt, a renowned economist and professor, published a groundbreaking paper titled “Marketing Myopia,” which introduced the concept of viewing marketing through the lens of fulfilling customer needs rather than focusing solely on selling specific products. This essay will delve into Levitt’s seminal work and explore the concept of marketing myopia, its implications for businesses, and how it relates to market disruption. By examining Levitt’s ideas, we can gain valuable insights into the importance of customer-centricity and the role of innovation in driving business success.
Understanding Marketing Myopia
Marketing myopia occurs when a company adopts a shortsighted approach to marketing, emphasizing the sale of specific products or services rather than understanding and meeting customer needs. A myopic perspective can hinder long-term growth and prevent organizations from recognizing emerging market trends or disruptive technologies that may reshape their industry. Levitt argues that businesses should focus on understanding and fulfilling customer needs to remain relevant and competitive.
Levitt’s paper emphasizes that companies should define their business in terms of satisfying customer needs rather than defining it too narrowly around a specific product or industry. He provides several examples of industries that failed to adapt due to their myopic focus, such as the railroad industry’s decline because it viewed itself as being in the railroad business rather than the transportation business. By broadening their perspective and understanding the fundamental customer need – transportation – they could have adapted to emerging modes of transportation such as automobiles and airplanes.
The Customer-Centric Approach
At the heart of Levitt’s argument is the notion of customer-centricity. He emphasizes that businesses should identify and prioritize customer needs and preferences to build sustainable relationships and foster long-term success. By deeply understanding their customers, companies can develop products and services that effectively address their pain points and offer superior value.
Levitt suggests that businesses must adopt a market-oriented mindset, where they continuously monitor market trends, consumer behavior, and technological advancements. By doing so, organizations can identify evolving customer needs and tailor their offerings accordingly. This approach requires being proactive and staying ahead of the curve rather than being reactive to market changes.
The Role of Innovation in Overcoming Myopia
Levitt asserts that innovation is a key driver in overcoming marketing myopia. He defines innovation as not just thinking up new ideas but also implementing them. By fostering a culture of innovation, organizations can stay agile and adapt to changing market dynamics. Innovation enables businesses to create new products, services, and business models that better align with evolving customer needs.
Levitt’s paper highlights the importance of embracing disruptive technologies and industry shifts. He argues that companies should be willing to cannibalize their own products or services if necessary to stay competitive in a rapidly changing market. Embracing innovation requires a mindset shift away from short-term profitability towards long-term sustainability.
Marketing Myopia and Market Disruption
The concept of marketing myopia is closely intertwined with market disruption. Market disruption occurs when emerging technologies, business models, or innovative solutions fundamentally change an industry’s landscape. Companies that fail to recognize or adapt to these disruptions often face obsolescence.
Levitt’s paper serves as a warning against complacency in the face of market disruption. He urges businesses to be proactive in anticipating and embracing change rather than clinging to outdated practices. Companies that remain myopic risk losing market share to more innovative competitors who are better attuned to evolving customer needs.
To illustrate this point, consider the case of Blockbuster. Blockbuster was a dominant force in the video rental industry but failed to recognize the shift towards online streaming and subscription-based models. The company suffered from marketing myopia by viewing itself solely as a video rental business rather than understanding the underlying customer need for convenient access to entertainment content. As a result, Blockbuster lost its market leadership position to disruptive companies like Netflix, which understood and capitalized on changing consumer preferences.
Scholarly References
To support the analysis of Theodore Levitt’s “Marketing Myopia” and its relevance to market disruption, the following scholarly references are recommended:
Levitt, T. (1960). Marketing Myopia. Harvard Business Review.
This seminal article by Theodore Levitt introduces the concept of marketing myopia and provides numerous examples to illustrate its impact on businesses.
Christensen, C., Raynor, M., & McDonald, R. (2015). What is Disruptive Innovation? Harvard Business Review.
This article by Clayton Christensen et al. explains the concept of disruptive innovation and its implications for industries.
Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2016). Marketing Management (15th ed.). Pearson.
This comprehensive textbook offers insights into various marketing concepts, including customer-centricity and innovation.
Chesbrough, H. (2003). Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Harvard Business Review Press.
Henry Chesbrough’s book explores the idea of open innovation and how it can help organizations stay competitive in an era of rapid technological advancement.
Wirtz, J., & Lovelock, C. (2018). Services Marketing: People, Technology, Strategy (8th ed.). World Scientific Publishing.
This textbook provides a comprehensive understanding of services marketing, emphasizing the importance of customer-centricity and innovation in service industries.
By drawing insights from these scholarly references alongside Levitt’s “Marketing Myopia,” researchers can develop a robust understanding of marketing myopia’s significance in today’s rapidly evolving business landscape and its relationship with market disruption.
In conclusion, Theodore Levitt’s “Marketing Myopia” serves as a wake-up call for businesses to adopt a customer-centric approach rather than fixating solely on selling specific products or services. By embracing innovation and staying attuned to evolving customer needs, organizations can overcome marketing myopia and navigate market disruptions successfully. Levitt’s ideas continue to resonate today as businesses strive to remain competitive in an ever-changing marketplace.
