Note J Holmes use of language relevant to the topic of mental illness. Consult the 2 sources to answer the following 4 questions in the following order. The actual questions are italicized:
Questions for PART 1: Referring only to pages 1-25 (called “PART 1”) of his personal journal, answer the following question: Why is J. Holmes considered mentally ill? What does he talk about? What are his concerns? Please defend the argument that he IS mentally ill in this section by looking at his language. Make sure to offer a definition of mental illness (obtained from any reputable source) before you present an argument that he is mentally ill and refer to specific language in his journal to defend your argument that he is mentally ill. You have no choice here–argue he is mentally ill and dig around his journal for evidence to defend that conclusion.
Questions for PART 2: Referring only to pages 26-36 (called “PART 2”) of his personal journal, answer the following question: Does J Holmes still seem mentally ill? What does he talk about? What is his tone? Why or why not? Here, I want you to take a look at how the Homes’ language changes. Tell me whether you believe whether he still seems mentally ill in this part of the journal based on your reading of his text and your definition of mental illness. Basically my goal in asking you this question is to get you to think about what mental illness means to you in terms of a person’s capabilities and ability to use rational thought.
Questions for video testimony: Watch J. Holmes’s courtroom testimony of his mass murder in the given video link. My question is simple: Is this someone who you would describe as mentally ill? Why or why not? Be specific here–point to his language in the video to defend your position. What does he talk about? How well does he remember and describe the event? Does he describe a disorganized and chaotically-executed mass murder or does he describe an organized and methodical one?
Summary: Given the totality of your interpretation of the sources and your answers to questions #1-#3, do you think J. Holmes is mentally ill? Why or why not.
Solidarity: Living in light of Others Pope Francis stated: "Brought together culture implies seeing that others are not contenders, insights, yet siblings and sisters." Unification is a word openly tossed in philosophy. My view on solidarity is continually evolving. Because of collaborating with new individuals, I currently comprehend about philosophical exploration extended, the solidarity surprisingly was unique, I found that the experience of every individual is extraordinary. A few people discover solidarity when working with others, others tune in to individuals' encounters. Unification is the center idea of Christian morals. In spite of the fact that solidarity or comparable ideas can be found in other Christian customs and different strict and philosophical moral frameworks, the Catholic social convention may have best shaped the idea of solidarity in the only remaining century. This article demands that the solidarity accepted in Catholic Social Education (CST) gives an amazing and helpful comprehension of people, networks, organizations, and public social commitments. In this article, we explain its scriptural, religious and experimental establishments, recorded points of reference, and the reason, strategy and extent of solidarity as a layout of CST solidarity idea. This article additionally depicts the cutting edge use of Catholic solidarity morals and the hypothetical and reasonable difficulties to its acknowledgment. It isn't finished. Emir Durchem, sister's dad, bunches solidarity into two classes: mechanical solidarity and natural solidarity. Mechanical solidarity implies that aggregate bonds emerge from homogeneity of individuals, they are connected through regular similitudes, for example, their work, character, way of life, and so forth. Natural solidarity is a shared connection of different occupations How does solidarity and contrasts emerging from reliance supplement individuals? Mechanical solidarity is a type of social union that happens when individuals of society have comparative qualities and convictions and are occupied with comparable work. Mechanical solidarity is generally basic in conventional and straightforward society, for example, society where everybody eats steers and ranches. Amish society reflects mechanical solidarity. Conversely, natural solidarity is a type of social attachment that happens when individuals of society are associated, however stick to various qualities and convictions and take part in various kinds of work. Natural solidarity is the most widely recognized in social orders with complex businesses, for example, the American enormous urban areas of the 2000s.>GET ANSWER