A comparison of these two articles (“Meet the Artists Reclaiming AI from big tech – with the help of cats, bees and drag queens” and “When AI can make art – what does it mean for creativity?”) and their arguments. Distance yourself from the topic. You are not taking a stance or arguing your position. You are simply comparing the arguments of the two authors. Your thesis statement can thus simply address the underlying issue the articles are discussing.

 

Sample solution

Dante Alighieri played a critical role in the literature world through his poem Divine Comedy that was written in the 14th century. The poem contains Inferno, Purgatorio, and Paradiso. The Inferno is a description of the nine circles of torment that are found on the earth. It depicts the realms of the people that have gone against the spiritual values and who, instead, have chosen bestial appetite, violence, or fraud and malice. The nine circles of hell are limbo, lust, gluttony, greed and wrath. Others are heresy, violence, fraud, and treachery. The purpose of this paper is to examine the Dante’s Inferno in the perspective of its portrayal of God’s image and the justification of hell. 

In this epic poem, God is portrayed as a super being guilty of multiple weaknesses including being egotistic, unjust, and hypocritical. Dante, in this poem, depicts God as being more human than divine by challenging God’s omnipotence. Additionally, the manner in which Dante describes Hell is in full contradiction to the morals of God as written in the Bible. When god arranges Hell to flatter Himself, He commits egotism, a sin that is common among human beings (Cheney, 2016). The weakness is depicted in Limbo and on the Gate of Hell where, for instance, God sends those who do not worship Him to Hell. This implies that failure to worship Him is a sin.

God is also depicted as lacking justice in His actions thus removing the godly image. The injustice is portrayed by the manner in which the sodomites and opportunists are treated. The opportunists are subjected to banner chasing in their lives after death followed by being stung by insects and maggots. They are known to having done neither good nor bad during their lifetimes and, therefore, justice could have demanded that they be granted a neutral punishment having lived a neutral life. The sodomites are also punished unfairly by God when Brunetto Lattini is condemned to hell despite being a good leader (Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). While he commited sodomy, God chooses to ignore all the other good deeds that Brunetto did.

Finally, God is also portrayed as being hypocritical in His actions, a sin that further diminishes His godliness and makes Him more human. A case in point is when God condemns the sin of egotism and goes ahead to commit it repeatedly. Proverbs 29:23 states that “arrogance will bring your downfall, but if you are humble, you will be respected.” When Slattery condemns Dante’s human state as being weak, doubtful, and limited, he is proving God’s hypocrisy because He is also human (Verdicchio, 2015). The actions of God in Hell as portrayed by Dante are inconsistent with the Biblical literature. Both Dante and God are prone to making mistakes, something common among human beings thus making God more human.

To wrap it up, Dante portrays God is more human since He commits the same sins that humans commit: egotism, hypocrisy, and injustice. Hell is justified as being a destination for victims of the mistakes committed by God. The Hell is presented as being a totally different place as compared to what is written about it in the Bible. As a result, reading through the text gives an image of God who is prone to the very mistakes common to humans thus ripping Him off His lofty status of divine and, instead, making Him a mere human. Whether or not Dante did it intentionally is subject to debate but one thing is clear in the poem: the misconstrued notion of God is revealed to future generations.

 

References

Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). Dante’s inferno: Seven deadly sins in scientific publishing and how to avoid them. Addiction Science: A Guide for the Perplexed, 267.

Cheney, L. D. G. (2016). Illustrations for Dante’s Inferno: A Comparative Study of Sandro Botticelli, Giovanni Stradano, and Federico Zuccaro. Cultural and Religious Studies4(8), 487.

Verdicchio, M. (2015). Irony and Desire in Dante’s” Inferno” 27. Italica, 285-297.

Sample Answer

Sample Answer

 

 

 

Introduction

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in the realm of art and creativity has sparked a significant debate within the artistic community. This essay will compare two articles that delve into this topic: “Meet The Artists Reclaiming AI from big tech – with the help of cats, bees, and drag queens” and “When AI Can Make Art – What Does It Mean For Creativity.” While both articles discuss the implications of AI in the art world, they offer contrasting views on whether AI can truly be considered a creative force.

Body Paragraph 1 – AI in the Art World I

Both articles explore the impact of AI on the art world. “Meet The Artists Reclaiming AI” highlights how artists are leveraging AI as a tool for creativity and self-expression, while “When AI Can Make Art – What Does It Mean For Creativity” raises questions about the authenticity and originality of AI-generated art.

Body Paragraph 2 – The Intersection of Creativity and AI

The relationship between creativity and AI is a central theme in both articles. “Meet The Artists Reclaiming AI” celebrates the potential of AI to amplify human creativity and push artistic boundaries, whereas “When AI Can Make Art – What Does It Mean For Creativity” expresses concerns about the potential loss of human touch and emotion in AI-generated art.

Body Paragraph 3 – Ethical Considerations of AI in Art

Both articles address the ethical dilemmas posed by the use of AI in art. “Meet The Artists Reclaiming AI” argues that AI can democratize art and amplify diverse voices, while “When AI Can Make Art – What Does It Mean For Creativity” warns of the risks associated with AI potentially overshadowing human creativity and expression.

Conclusion

In conclusion, these articles shed light on the ongoing debate surrounding the role of AI in art and creativity. As technology continues to evolve, it is crucial to strike a balance between harnessing the innovative potential of AI and preserving the essence of human ingenuity in artistic endeavors. The future of AI in the art world remains uncertain, but these discussions provide valuable insights into navigating this intersection between technology and creativity.

 

This question has been answered.

Get Answer