Your task is to write a 1,500 word laboratory report that investigates the effectiveness of the Mind, Brain and Behaviour 2/B clinical psychology modules and practical classes in reducing public stigma about mental ill-health. This effectively means that the aim of your lab report is to address the research question:

“Is the MBB-B/2 clinical psychology program effective in reducing public stigma about mental illness?”

Throughout the semester, you will be given plenty of support as you commence on your lab report writing journey. Some general starting information is provided below. The detailed assignment brief, marking criteria, starting readings and other resources can be found in the.This assessment task requires you to demonstrate the following intended learning outcomes:

Describe, utilise and illustrate psychological research methods and data analysis
Discuss and critically evaluate psychological literature
Use, evaluate and analyse scientific methodology and enquiry
Critically discuss and debate competing and complementary perspectives of wellbeing
Write reports in an appropriate format and style for psychological science
Critically evaluate psychological literature and utilise research design and data analysis skills to communicate the outcomes of a psychological investigation
Discuss and justify the importance of individual differences within and between different cultural groups in designing appropriate psychological research.

Proposed Laboratory Report Structure

Introduction

  • Background on mental illness stigma: Discuss the prevalence and impact of public stigma on individuals with mental illness.
  • Theoretical framework: Explain the theoretical underpinnings of stigma reduction interventions, such as the social-cognitive model or the contact theory.
  • Research question: Clearly state the research question: “Is the MBB-B/2 clinical psychology program effective in reducing public stigma about mental illness?”
  • Hypothesis: Formulate a testable hypothesis based on the research question and theoretical framework.

Proposed Laboratory Report Structure

Introduction

  • Background on mental illness stigma: Discuss the prevalence and impact of public stigma on individuals with mental illness.
  • Theoretical framework: Explain the theoretical underpinnings of stigma reduction interventions, such as the social-cognitive model or the contact theory.
  • Research question: Clearly state the research question: “Is the MBB-B/2 clinical psychology program effective in reducing public stigma about mental illness?”
  • Hypothesis: Formulate a testable hypothesis based on the research question and theoretical framework.

Method

  • Participants: Describe the characteristics of the participants (e.g., age, gender, education level, cultural background).
  • Design: Explain the research design (e.g., experimental, quasi-experimental, correlational).
  • Measures: Outline the measures used to assess stigma reduction (e.g., stigmatizing attitudes scale, perceived social distance scale).
  • Procedure: Detail the steps involved in conducting the study, including the intervention (MBB-B/2 program) and data collection.

Results

  • Descriptive statistics: Present descriptive statistics for the relevant variables (e.g., mean, standard deviation).
  • Inferential statistics: Conduct appropriate statistical tests (e.g., t-test, ANOVA) to analyze the data.
  • Effect size: Calculate effect size to assess the magnitude of the intervention’s impact.

Discussion

  • Interpretation of results: Discuss the findings in relation to the research question and hypothesis.
  • Comparison with previous research: Compare the results to findings from other studies on stigma reduction interventions.
  • Limitations and future directions: Acknowledge the limitations of the study and suggest potential areas for future research.
  • Implications for practice: Discuss the implications of the findings for clinical practice and public health initiatives.

References

  • APA style: List all cited references in APA style.

Potential Research Design and Measures

Quasi-experimental design:

  • Pretest-posttest design: Measure stigma levels before and after the MBB-B/2 program.
  • Comparison group: Compare the program’s effectiveness to a control group that does not receive the intervention.

Measures:

  • Stigma measures:
    • Stigma Attitudes Scale (SAS)
    • Perceived Social Distance Scale (PSDS)
    • Community Attitudes and Beliefs Scale (CAB)
  • Program evaluation measures:
    • Program satisfaction survey
    • Knowledge and skills assessment

Data Analysis

  • Descriptive statistics: Calculate means, standard deviations, and frequencies for the relevant variables.
  • Inferential statistics: Use appropriate statistical tests, such as t-tests or ANOVAs, to compare pre- and post-intervention scores and to assess the impact of the program.
  • Effect size: Calculate effect size measures (e.g., Cohen’s d) to quantify the magnitude of the intervention’s impact.

Note: This is a general outline, and the specific details of your laboratory report will depend on the design and methods you choose. It is essential to consult with your instructor and refer to the assignment brief for guidance.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer