Multiple ways the 2022 Ottawa Convoy

by | Mar 15, 2023 | Media

 

What are the multiple ways the 2022 Ottawa Convoy has been presented? You will craft a response in 7-10 pages that utilize at least 4 of the sources used in the course while addressing the following prompts:
1. Whom are the main actors involved? Community groups? Social campaigners? Podcasters? Politicians? Concerned citizens?
2.What environment is the debate taking place in?Is it primarily on one social media platform or multiple? Are the parties involved self-segregating and only
speaking with those they agree with (like an echo chamber)? Alternatively, is it an ongoing debate where contesting sides are willing to share their views
openly? (Are there echo chambers? Or is it a social media fight taking place through hashtags? Or some other form of the digital contest?)
2.How are the debates being framed? How are the contesting sides framing each other?
3.Are there instances where one side deliberately misrepresents the other side’s views?
4.Is there any area where the contesting sides agree?
5.Based on your evidence, what does the future look like for the actors involved? Will there be a compromise? Can there be?

 

Sample solution

Dante Alighieri played a critical role in the literature world through his poem Divine Comedy that was written in the 14th century. The poem contains Inferno, Purgatorio, and Paradiso. The Inferno is a description of the nine circles of torment that are found on the earth. It depicts the realms of the people that have gone against the spiritual values and who, instead, have chosen bestial appetite, violence, or fraud and malice. The nine circles of hell are limbo, lust, gluttony, greed and wrath. Others are heresy, violence, fraud, and treachery. The purpose of this paper is to examine the Dante’s Inferno in the perspective of its portrayal of God’s image and the justification of hell. 

In this epic poem, God is portrayed as a super being guilty of multiple weaknesses including being egotistic, unjust, and hypocritical. Dante, in this poem, depicts God as being more human than divine by challenging God’s omnipotence. Additionally, the manner in which Dante describes Hell is in full contradiction to the morals of God as written in the Bible. When god arranges Hell to flatter Himself, He commits egotism, a sin that is common among human beings (Cheney, 2016). The weakness is depicted in Limbo and on the Gate of Hell where, for instance, God sends those who do not worship Him to Hell. This implies that failure to worship Him is a sin.


This question has been answered

God is also depicted as lacking justice in His actions thus removing the godly image. The injustice is portrayed by the manner in which the sodomites and opportunists are treated. The opportunists are subjected to banner chasing in their lives after death followed by being stung by insects and maggots. They are known to having done neither good nor bad during their lifetimes and, therefore, justice could have demanded that they be granted a neutral punishment having lived a neutral life. The sodomites are also punished unfairly by God when Brunetto Lattini is condemned to hell despite being a good leader (Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). While he commited sodomy, God chooses to ignore all the other good deeds that Brunetto did.

Finally, God is also portrayed as being hypocritical in His actions, a sin that further diminishes His godliness and makes Him more human. A case in point is when God condemns the sin of egotism and goes ahead to commit it repeatedly. Proverbs 29:23 states that “arrogance will bring your downfall, but if you are humble, you will be respected.” When Slattery condemns Dante’s human state as being weak, doubtful, and limited, he is proving God’s hypocrisy because He is also human (Verdicchio, 2015). The actions of God in Hell as portrayed by Dante are inconsistent with the Biblical literature. Both Dante and God are prone to making mistakes, something common among human beings thus making God more human.

To wrap it up, Dante portrays God is more human since He commits the same sins that humans commit: egotism, hypocrisy, and injustice. Hell is justified as being a destination for victims of the mistakes committed by God. The Hell is presented as being a totally different place as compared to what is written about it in the Bible. As a result, reading through the text gives an image of God who is prone to the very mistakes common to humans thus ripping Him off His lofty status of divine and, instead, making Him a mere human. Whether or not Dante did it intentionally is subject to debate but one thing is clear in the poem: the misconstrued notion of God is revealed to future generations.

 

References

Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). Dante’s inferno: Seven deadly sins in scientific publishing and how to avoid them. Addiction Science: A Guide for the Perplexed, 267.

Cheney, L. D. G. (2016). Illustrations for Dante’s Inferno: A Comparative Study of Sandro Botticelli, Giovanni Stradano, and Federico Zuccaro. Cultural and Religious Studies, 4(8), 487.

Verdicchio, M. (2015). Irony and Desire in Dante’s” Inferno” 27. Italica, 285-297.

Sample Solution

The 2022 Ottawa Convoy is a controversial event which has been presented in multiple ways. It involves community groups, social campaigners, podcasters, politicians and concerned citizens from across Canada debating the merits of allowing or rejecting the proposed convoy which would bring awareness to Indigenous issues. The main actors involved are Indigenous people who have advocated for the convoy as well as those opposed to it due to safety concerns and potential disruptions to traffic along the planned route. The debate surrounding this issue takes place primarily on social media platforms such as Twitter, Facebook and Instagram with both sides self-segregating into respective echo chambers of support for or against the convoy.

Sample Solution

The 2022 Ottawa Convoy is a controversial event which has been presented in multiple ways. It involves community groups, social campaigners, podcasters, politicians and concerned citizens from across Canada debating the merits of allowing or rejecting the proposed convoy which would bring awareness to Indigenous issues. The main actors involved are Indigenous people who have advocated for the convoy as well as those opposed to it due to safety concerns and potential disruptions to traffic along the planned route. The debate surrounding this issue takes place primarily on social media platforms such as Twitter, Facebook and Instagram with both sides self-segregating into respective echo chambers of support for or against the convoy.

The debates are largely being framed by both sides in terms of safety versus rights: those in favour of allowing the convoy argue that it will provide an important platform for Indigenous Peoples’ voices to be heard while opponents point out that it could lead to dangerous situations due to heavy truck traffic on busy city roads and highways. There have been instances where one side has deliberately misrepresented information about their opposition – specifically when opponents mischaracterised some supporters of the convoy as “radical activists” – but there are also areas where both parties agree such as wanting what is best for all Canadians regardless of race or culture.

Based on available evidence, it appears that there may be a compromise reached between the contesting sides if they can find common ground on this issue without compromising either party’s core values and beliefs. For example, if those in favour can accept some adjustments regarding timing, routes and other details related to organizing a safe event then perhaps a mutually beneficial solution could be found which satisfies everyone involved without resorting to further polarizing rhetoric or name-calling tactics used throughout this debate so far. Ultimately however only time will tell how this situation plays out – hopefully resulting in a peaceful resolution which respects everyone’s right to freedom of expression whilst prioritising public safety at all times.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer