Summarize a minimum of three articles. Explicitly state the way(s) in which they relate to the Bill of Rights. Do NOT cut and paste from articles. Summarize in your own words.
In each of these stories, do you feel that the Bill of Rights has been violated or upheld? Explain your reasoning in some detail. Make sure to provide proper source information for the stories you decide to discuss!
Answer the questions in Microsoft Word in a paper of about 2 pages. Provide a citation for the articles you read in APA format.

Sample solution

Dante Alighieri played a critical role in the literature world through his poem Divine Comedy that was written in the 14th century. The poem contains Inferno, Purgatorio, and Paradiso. The Inferno is a description of the nine circles of torment that are found on the earth. It depicts the realms of the people that have gone against the spiritual values and who, instead, have chosen bestial appetite, violence, or fraud and malice. The nine circles of hell are limbo, lust, gluttony, greed and wrath. Others are heresy, violence, fraud, and treachery. The purpose of this paper is to examine the Dante’s Inferno in the perspective of its portrayal of God’s image and the justification of hell. 

In this epic poem, God is portrayed as a super being guilty of multiple weaknesses including being egotistic, unjust, and hypocritical. Dante, in this poem, depicts God as being more human than divine by challenging God’s omnipotence. Additionally, the manner in which Dante describes Hell is in full contradiction to the morals of God as written in the Bible. When god arranges Hell to flatter Himself, He commits egotism, a sin that is common among human beings (Cheney, 2016). The weakness is depicted in Limbo and on the Gate of Hell where, for instance, God sends those who do not worship Him to Hell. This implies that failure to worship Him is a sin.

God is also depicted as lacking justice in His actions thus removing the godly image. The injustice is portrayed by the manner in which the sodomites and opportunists are treated. The opportunists are subjected to banner chasing in their lives after death followed by being stung by insects and maggots. They are known to having done neither good nor bad during their lifetimes and, therefore, justice could have demanded that they be granted a neutral punishment having lived a neutral life. The sodomites are also punished unfairly by God when Brunetto Lattini is condemned to hell despite being a good leader (Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). While he commited sodomy, God chooses to ignore all the other good deeds that Brunetto did.

Finally, God is also portrayed as being hypocritical in His actions, a sin that further diminishes His godliness and makes Him more human. A case in point is when God condemns the sin of egotism and goes ahead to commit it repeatedly. Proverbs 29:23 states that “arrogance will bring your downfall, but if you are humble, you will be respected.” When Slattery condemns Dante’s human state as being weak, doubtful, and limited, he is proving God’s hypocrisy because He is also human (Verdicchio, 2015). The actions of God in Hell as portrayed by Dante are inconsistent with the Biblical literature. Both Dante and God are prone to making mistakes, something common among human beings thus making God more human.

To wrap it up, Dante portrays God is more human since He commits the same sins that humans commit: egotism, hypocrisy, and injustice. Hell is justified as being a destination for victims of the mistakes committed by God. The Hell is presented as being a totally different place as compared to what is written about it in the Bible. As a result, reading through the text gives an image of God who is prone to the very mistakes common to humans thus ripping Him off His lofty status of divine and, instead, making Him a mere human. Whether or not Dante did it intentionally is subject to debate but one thing is clear in the poem: the misconstrued notion of God is revealed to future generations.

 

References

Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). Dante’s inferno: Seven deadly sins in scientific publishing and how to avoid them. Addiction Science: A Guide for the Perplexed, 267.

Cheney, L. D. G. (2016). Illustrations for Dante’s Inferno: A Comparative Study of Sandro Botticelli, Giovanni Stradano, and Federico Zuccaro. Cultural and Religious Studies4(8), 487.

Verdicchio, M. (2015). Irony and Desire in Dante’s” Inferno” 27. Italica, 285-297.

Let’s consider this potential effect:

The COVID-19 experience will lead to a significant re-evaluation of the balance between individual liberty and public health imperatives in American society.

This is certainly up for debate. On one hand, the pandemic saw widespread government-mandated restrictions on individual behavior (e.g., mask mandates, lockdowns, vaccine requirements in some contexts) in the name of public health. This could lead to a lasting shift in how Americans view the government’s role in safeguarding collective well-being, potentially accepting more limitations on individual freedoms during future public health crises.  

On the other hand, these very restrictions sparked considerable debate and resistance, with many arguing that they infringed upon fundamental rights and individual autonomy. This pushback could lead to a stronger emphasis on individual liberties and a greater skepticism towards broad public health mandates in the future

Let’s consider this potential effect:

The COVID-19 experience will lead to a significant re-evaluation of the balance between individual liberty and public health imperatives in American society.

This is certainly up for debate. On one hand, the pandemic saw widespread government-mandated restrictions on individual behavior (e.g., mask mandates, lockdowns, vaccine requirements in some contexts) in the name of public health. This could lead to a lasting shift in how Americans view the government’s role in safeguarding collective well-being, potentially accepting more limitations on individual freedoms during future public health crises.  

On the other hand, these very restrictions sparked considerable debate and resistance, with many arguing that they infringed upon fundamental rights and individual autonomy. This pushback could lead to a stronger emphasis on individual liberties and a greater skepticism towards broad public health mandates in the future

Underlying Evidence:

To support this point, we can look at research in several areas:

  1. Studies on Public Opinion and Trust in Government: Research examining how the pandemic affected public trust in government institutions and attitudes towards government authority in matters of public health would be relevant. For example, studies might have tracked changes in approval ratings for different levels of government or explored shifts in the willingness of individuals to comply with public health recommendations. This kind of data could indicate whether the pandemic led to greater acceptance or greater skepticism of government intervention.

  2. Legal and Constitutional Scholarship: Analyses of legal challenges to pandemic-related restrictions and scholarly debates about the scope of government power during public health emergencies would provide insights into the evolving understanding of the balance between individual rights and collective safety. Legal precedents set during this time and ongoing constitutional debates are crucial evidence.

  3. Social and Behavioral Science Research on Risk Perception and Compliance: Studies exploring how individuals perceived the risks of COVID-19 and their motivations for complying (or not complying) with public health measures can shed light on underlying values related to individual autonomy versus collective responsibility. Factors influencing trust in science and public health authorities would also be important.

Potential Sources (Illustrative – I would conduct a search to find specific articles):

  1. A study from a political science journal analyzing public opinion surveys before, during, and after periods of significant COVID-19 restrictions, focusing on trust in government and attitudes towards public health mandates.  

  2. An article from a law review discussing key court cases that challenged COVID-19 related restrictions and analyzing the legal reasoning related to individual liberties versus state police power.

  3. Research from a social psychology journal investigating the factors that influenced individuals’ adherence to mask mandates or vaccine recommendations, potentially exploring the role of individualistic versus collectivist values.

By examining these kinds of sources, we can build a well-supported argument about how the COVID-19 experience might lead to a lasting re-evaluation of the balance between individual liberty and public health in America, acknowledging the different potential directions this re-evaluation could take.

Let me know if you’d like me to explore another potential significant and debatable effect!

This question has been answered.

Get Answer