Respond to the following scenario with your thoughts, ideas, and comments. Be substantive and clear, and use research to reinforce your ideas.
It has been a year since the new CEO has been on the job, and the organization has seen sustainable growth. The former CEO came out of retirement to be elected the Chairwoman of the Board of Directors. At a recent meeting of the Board of Directors, the Chairwoman of the Board discussed the possible investment opportunities in the energy industry. She has asked you to prepare a case study on an energy company to establish if it is a good choice to include in the company’s investment portfolio.
Using CTU Library resources, choose a company in the energy industry and prepare a case study that addresses the following points:
Introduction: Including a description of the company, its industry, and its business context. Organizational analysis: Including the company’s leadership, market, operations, finances, performance, and regulatory environment. Critical incidents: Including any stories of the organization’s challenges or achievements. How did it overcome the challenges? How did it accomplish its achievements? Investment potential: Including any of its current issues that need to be addressed or its potential goals for growth. Recommendation: Including how the investment might help the organization to address its current issues or realize its potential for growth.
Presentation The UK lodging division has been under the shadow of 'Credit Crunch' since June 2007, which started from United States and started to cover the globe. The development business, as well as the various ventures including materials and so on were influenced because of this. The lodging part was thriving step by step as more activities where presented and the log books were filled till next couple of month, until June 2007, the credit crunch started to grow its plumes, after which the entire streamlines started to draw down. The undesirable outcome for UK lodging segment showed up as; 20 - 30 % of house costs tumbled from its most extreme level, from 2007 onwards Mortgages are not endorsed as often as possible as it was done previously and just half are affirmed and new home are not worked as regularly as were done before 2007. Goodhart and Hofmann (2008) clarify that the home loan rates are specifically dependant on the banks which strongly affects the cost of the houses. Because of Financial Recession a disturbing circumstance emerged bringing about difference in various approaches inside an association with a specific end goal to survive. The Large House Builder, plc is an extensive UK national house manufacturer which has found a way to neutralize the 'Credit Crunch' by keeping up a harmony between its cost and its consumption. This it has done by chopping down its costs, offering the bit of land which it acquired with the goal that it could be sold at a reason capable cost when required and by repositioning itself into social lodging segment. Appleyard (2006) states that the UK's lodging part is experiencing a change. The present subsidence has empowered the lodging area to change. This change is more often than not through combining one firm into another with the goal that both advantage from each other's understanding and aptitude. The organization leading body of Large House Builders, plc has hence chosen to achieve the administrations of Small Firm Ltd which is a little, territorial lodging engineer in the South East of England. This report will address the key change administration issues which would happen when there is mergence of Small Housing Builders Ltd into Large Housing Builders plc with respect to its authoritative structure and culture. The second part will be the further investigation of this mergence as arrangement of a change administration get ready for the initial two years. Extensive HOUSE BUILDER plc The UK national house manufacturer or the Large Housing Builder (LHB) plc has real commitment in UK for the most recent decade (Appleyard, 2006). The organization has a territorial structure with workplaces all through various areas of the nation. This provincial structure is overseen by a local supervisor who is dependable to reply to the focal administration board concerning his assignments which primarily incorporate the benefit/misfortune, obtaining of land and every one of the techniques associated with accomplishing it and the improvement and advertising of the site. An ongoing examination done by The Future Shape of the Sector Commission (2006) demonstrates that in 2006, Large House Builders were fruitful to assemble 25,000 houses. Be that as it may, because of the retreat in 2007, this figure is said to diminish radically. The examination additionally recommends that to shield the market from unfavorable impacts of credit crunch, Large firms began to converge with Small firms so as to profit itself alongside the other firm. The Large House manufacturer plc, being a major association has the capacity to balance out it in various ways. The present Recession has restricted the space for the extensive lodging manufacturers to extend further. The main way recommended is by mergence, which should be possible by having solid interior and outer connections inside and outside the organization. This will result in most extreme yield and the main need to fulfill the client is consequently accomplished (The Future Shape of the Sector Commission, 2006) Authoritative STRUCTURE Greenberg (1996) underlines that association structure ought to be to such an extent that it ought to obviously expound the game plan between the single and gathering of individuals comparing to the appointed obligations, capacities and power with a specific association. In spite of the fact that it isn't conceivable to see the authoritative structure physically however it can be displayed as a diagram known as "association outline" which explains the design of the gatherings engaged with the association. Such association graph can be seen for Large House Builders (Appendix B). The association structure of Large Housing Builders is a mind boggling one the same number of gatherings are engaged with this firm. Indeed there are upwards of 20 sub-parties working at once for a solitary task. They can be from planning group to completed undertaking, transportation and coordinations of development materials to fund office, from IT division to Estimation works and so on. From this reality it can be seen that it is very hard to structure the association on one single page. With a specific end goal to characterize the objectives, the pertinent piece of the association is amplified yet there is a profound between connection between various gatherings of the organization which jumps the way. As expressed before, the firm is influencing its best for the survival in the present Credit To crunch. Despite the fact that the best administration is giving more significance to buckle down to accomplish flourishing which it has found as positive advancement yet the whole battle is finishing off with vain as the current budgetary emergency isn't allowing to thrive. The administration of the firm has a craving for climbing an enormous mountain with regards to paying the pay rates to the staff in the present credit crunch. As per Lu (2009, CL) the structure of the organization is the right use of the potential offices and the limit that an organization has. There can be three manners by which the task can be coordinated into the firm: Utilitarian Structure In this kind of structure, much underscore is given to utilitarian part. Ventures are situated in useful units, for example, HR, fund and promoting where as the activities situated in work which has prevailing part with pertinent staff being favored from different capacities for term of the undertaking. The disservice is this structure is that all gatherings are more engaged towards utilitarian administrator. Lattice Structure The Matrix structure is the one which has both the useful director and also the task chief. The individuals from the venture need to answer to both the practical and additionally the undertaking supervisors. There are three kinds of grid structures as per their qualities; a. Useful Matrix Structure In this the useful supervisors are more overwhelming than the task chiefs. This kind of network framework is likewise called "Powerless Matrix" framework and is for the most part appropriate for expansive Firms. b. Adjusted Matrix Structure In this compose the undertaking chiefs and the practical directors share square with control among them. This kind of framework structure is additionally called a "Flawless Matrix".>GET ANSWER