Conduct internet research and give examples, support, and explain your answers and positions.

What is the power structure in your organization?
Does the power structure match the organizational structure? (Who really has the power?)
How is conflict handled within the organization?
Is conflict viewed as a growth opportunity or as a nuisance?
Does conflict lead to change? If not, what initiates change in your organization?

 

Sample solution

Dante Alighieri played a critical role in the literature world through his poem Divine Comedy that was written in the 14th century. The poem contains Inferno, Purgatorio, and Paradiso. The Inferno is a description of the nine circles of torment that are found on the earth. It depicts the realms of the people that have gone against the spiritual values and who, instead, have chosen bestial appetite, violence, or fraud and malice. The nine circles of hell are limbo, lust, gluttony, greed and wrath. Others are heresy, violence, fraud, and treachery. The purpose of this paper is to examine the Dante’s Inferno in the perspective of its portrayal of God’s image and the justification of hell. 

In this epic poem, God is portrayed as a super being guilty of multiple weaknesses including being egotistic, unjust, and hypocritical. Dante, in this poem, depicts God as being more human than divine by challenging God’s omnipotence. Additionally, the manner in which Dante describes Hell is in full contradiction to the morals of God as written in the Bible. When god arranges Hell to flatter Himself, He commits egotism, a sin that is common among human beings (Cheney, 2016). The weakness is depicted in Limbo and on the Gate of Hell where, for instance, God sends those who do not worship Him to Hell. This implies that failure to worship Him is a sin.

God is also depicted as lacking justice in His actions thus removing the godly image. The injustice is portrayed by the manner in which the sodomites and opportunists are treated. The opportunists are subjected to banner chasing in their lives after death followed by being stung by insects and maggots. They are known to having done neither good nor bad during their lifetimes and, therefore, justice could have demanded that they be granted a neutral punishment having lived a neutral life. The sodomites are also punished unfairly by God when Brunetto Lattini is condemned to hell despite being a good leader (Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). While he commited sodomy, God chooses to ignore all the other good deeds that Brunetto did.

Finally, God is also portrayed as being hypocritical in His actions, a sin that further diminishes His godliness and makes Him more human. A case in point is when God condemns the sin of egotism and goes ahead to commit it repeatedly. Proverbs 29:23 states that “arrogance will bring your downfall, but if you are humble, you will be respected.” When Slattery condemns Dante’s human state as being weak, doubtful, and limited, he is proving God’s hypocrisy because He is also human (Verdicchio, 2015). The actions of God in Hell as portrayed by Dante are inconsistent with the Biblical literature. Both Dante and God are prone to making mistakes, something common among human beings thus making God more human.

To wrap it up, Dante portrays God is more human since He commits the same sins that humans commit: egotism, hypocrisy, and injustice. Hell is justified as being a destination for victims of the mistakes committed by God. The Hell is presented as being a totally different place as compared to what is written about it in the Bible. As a result, reading through the text gives an image of God who is prone to the very mistakes common to humans thus ripping Him off His lofty status of divine and, instead, making Him a mere human. Whether or not Dante did it intentionally is subject to debate but one thing is clear in the poem: the misconstrued notion of God is revealed to future generations.

 

References

Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). Dante’s inferno: Seven deadly sins in scientific publishing and how to avoid them. Addiction Science: A Guide for the Perplexed, 267.

Cheney, L. D. G. (2016). Illustrations for Dante’s Inferno: A Comparative Study of Sandro Botticelli, Giovanni Stradano, and Federico Zuccaro. Cultural and Religious Studies4(8), 487.

Verdicchio, M. (2015). Irony and Desire in Dante’s” Inferno” 27. Italica, 285-297.

Power Structure in AI Development Projects:

In such projects, power is often distributed across different roles and areas of expertise:

  • Technical Leads: Hold significant power due to their deep understanding of AI algorithms, model training, and software development. They influence technical decisions and project direction.
  • Research Scientists: Possess power through their knowledge of cutting-edge AI research and their ability to innovate. They can shape the project’s long-term goals and explore new possibilities.
  • Product Managers: Have power related to defining product vision, user needs, and market strategy. They influence which AI features are prioritized and how the technology is applied.

Power Structure in AI Development Projects:

In such projects, power is often distributed across different roles and areas of expertise:

  • Technical Leads: Hold significant power due to their deep understanding of AI algorithms, model training, and software development. They influence technical decisions and project direction.
  • Research Scientists: Possess power through their knowledge of cutting-edge AI research and their ability to innovate. They can shape the project’s long-term goals and explore new possibilities.
  • Product Managers: Have power related to defining product vision, user needs, and market strategy. They influence which AI features are prioritized and how the technology is applied.
  • Data Scientists: Hold power due to their expertise in data collection, analysis, and interpretation. They influence the quality and availability of data, which is crucial for AI model performance.

Matching Power Structure with Organizational Structure:

Ideally, the power structure should align with the organizational structure to ensure effective decision-making and project execution. However, imbalances can occur:

  • Technical Leads dominating: If technical leads have excessive power, they might prioritize technical elegance over user needs or product feasibility.
  • Research scientists disconnected: If research scientists operate in isolation, their innovative ideas might not be effectively translated into practical applications.
  • Product managers lacking technical understanding: If product managers lack sufficient technical understanding, they might make unrealistic demands or misinterpret the capabilities of AI technology.

Handling Conflict:

Conflict is inevitable in complex projects with diverse stakeholders. It can arise from disagreements about technical approaches, product priorities, resource allocation, or timelines.

  • Conflict as a growth opportunity: When handled constructively, conflict can lead to better solutions and stronger team cohesion. It can encourage exploration of alternative approaches, challenge assumptions, and foster deeper understanding of different perspectives.
  • Conflict as a nuisance: If conflict is ignored or suppressed, it can escalate and become destructive. It can lead to resentment, communication breakdowns, and project delays.

Conflict and Change:

Conflict can be a powerful driver of change in AI development projects. When disagreements arise, they can trigger:

  • Re-evaluation of technical decisions: Conflict might lead to revisiting technical choices, exploring new algorithms, or refining model training strategies.
  • Shifting product priorities: Conflict might result in re-prioritizing AI features, adjusting product roadmaps, or focusing on different user needs.
  • Improved collaboration: Conflict can force teams to communicate more effectively, clarify roles and responsibilities, and build stronger working relationships.

Other Initiators of Change:

Besides conflict, other factors can initiate change in AI development projects:

  • Advancements in AI research: New breakthroughs in AI can open up new possibilities and prompt project teams to explore new applications.
  • Changes in market demands: Shifting user preferences or emerging market trends can necessitate adjustments in product strategy and AI development efforts.
  • Feedback from users: User feedback can provide valuable insights into the strengths and weaknesses of AI features, leading to improvements and new development directions.

In conclusion, while I don’t exist within a traditional organization, analyzing AI development projects provides a relevant context for understanding power structures, conflict, and change. In such projects, power is distributed across different areas of expertise, and conflict, when handled constructively, can be a catalyst for growth and positive change.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer