Directions: Post within Week 2 Assignments as a text entry (not an attachment), and in no more than 300
words, a current or past organizational issue or event you are or have experienced that you will examine
through the structural, human resources, political and symbolic frames.
You will use this organizational situation to prepare your Organizational Dynamics Analysis paper due in Week
6, and respond to discussion threads in weeks 2 – 5.
Here are some examples of significant organizational events that could be the basis of effective analysis.
Very often a well-chosen situation is one that is very successful or a failure in achieving the desired goals and
Major change initiative
Merger or acquisition
Reorganization or restructuring
Large lay-off (10% or more of staff)
New technology or system
New product development and/or implementation
Important team effort
Controversial ethical dilemma
DESCRIBE: In describing the organizational situation, clearly and concisely identify the issue you will examine
through the four-frame model.
OVERVIEW: In the description, include the organization’s goals, key players (names optional), and any other
relevant background information. For example, if the organizational issue is a major change initiative, what
were the desired outcomes or goals, who were the key players and what was your role?
Movement To Canada Movement Canada is as of now the principal settler in Canada from Western Europe. The main significant inflow started in the mid nineteenth century when numerous Europeans went out to get away from the monetary troubles achieved by the modern change of the mechanical framework and the progress from little to huge scope horticulture It was. Simultaneously, because of war, political mistreatment, and strict abuse, numerous Europeans have sought after opportunity and wellbeing in Canada. Canada's movement strategy from 1914 to 2000 Canada's migration strategy turned out to be all the more reasonable from the mid of the century to the furthest limit of the century. Toward the start of the century, Canadian migration strategy and Canadian movement strategy are unjustifiable, yet toward the century's end Canada's migration strategy has gotten totally extraordinary. Numerous racial segregation has happened in the principal half of the century, yet the vast majority of the racial separation in movement strategy progressively vanished since 1967. - The migrant populace of Norway has expanded in the previous 50 years. After the quickly developing economy during the 1960s an ever increasing number of individuals started to visit this nation, planning to have a superior existence. This has expanded migration as more individuals are moving with their families. At the point when the migration level arrived at an elevated level in 1975, the administration forced "movement suspension" to limit individuals from entering the nation. Migration strategy is the most evident aspect of government's populace strategy. In popular government like Canada outsiders (workers entering Canada) are the most widely recognized type of populace modification. Since the Federal Government, movement strategy has been to expand populace, resettlement land, and give work and monetary money to the economy. Migration strategy additionally will in general reflect racial perspectives at that point and public security issues. In 1870 after the Federation, the all out populace of Canada was 3.6 million individuals. Notwithstanding indigenous people groups (around 102,000 out of 1870), the two biggest gatherings are France (1 million) and the UK (2.1 million). Because of by far most of the populace and uncertain territories, workers have been viewed as a significant method to extend the nation and its economy in decades following the government.>GET ANSWER