Periodicals to determine views on Mr. McNealy’s leadership style

2. McNealy's Leadership: Divergent Opinions

Periodical 1: Critical Perspective

A 2002 article in Forbes might criticize McNealy's leadership during the dot-com bust. The article could highlight how McNealy's "outrageousness," once a source of innovation, became a barrier to necessary change. It might argue that his insistence on maintaining an aggressive strategy in a more cautious market led Sun down the wrong path.

Periodical 2: Supportive Viewpoint

A 2000 article from Fortune magazine might offer a more positive view of McNealy's leadership. It could praise his vision and ability to identify and capitalize on market trends in the 1990s. The article could argue that the broader economic downturn, not McNealy's leadership style, was the primary factor behind Sun's struggles.

3. Consultant's Recommendations

Given the current situation (2024, with Sun being acquired by Oracle), it's beyond the scope to discuss specific actions for Sun's independent management team. However, based on the information provided, here's a general recommendation:

The Sun board should critically evaluate the existing management team's adaptability. While McNealy's prior success is undeniable, his inability to adapt to changing circumstances raises concerns. The board should consider bringing in new leadership with a proven ability to adjust strategies in response to economic and technological shifts.

However, a complete overhaul might not be necessary. If the existing team demonstrates a willingness to learn and adapt their approach, they might still be capable of leading Sun to success under Oracle's umbrella.

1. Sun Microsystems' Management Practices: A Mixed Bag

A quick online search reveals that Sun Microsystems is no longer an independent company. In 2010, Oracle Corporation acquired Sun, marking the end of Sun's independent existence.  

Looking back at Sun's history in the few years leading up to the acquisition, we can identify both positive and negative management practices. On the positive side, Sun, under Scott McNealy's leadership, thrived in the 1990s. McNealy's bold vision, optimism, and willingness to take risks resulted in successful products and strong shareholder profits. However, this same style proved detrimental in the early 2000s. When the dot-com bubble burst, Sun continued with a "business as usual" approach, failing to adapt to the more conservative economic climate.

This resulted in missed opportunities and declining stock prices.