Many Contemporary Philosophers of religion have felt that Kant’s overriding emphasis on universal moral laws and his abstract concept of GOD and TH FREEDOM OF THE WILL have ignored the concrete, existential situation of the individual, who lives in a time when atheism is an alternative to traditional THEISM.
select two of the following philosophers of religion and analyze their PHILOSOPHICAL INTERPRETATIONS of 1-Religion 2-GOD 3-ETHICS and MORALITY
a) Friedrich Schleiermacher b) Soren Kierkegaard c) Friedrich Nietzsche
Past examinations that inspected the connection among funniness and maturing center around just a solitary one of five unmistakable amusingness speculations, the most well known is known as the "confusion hypothesis" in view of two inconsistent parts, which is the distinction between what we expect and what we really observe. The thought is that we snicker at things that appear to be strange in light of the fact that we locate that amusing. A genuine model would see a bear strolling into a bar since this keeps running against our desires so we locate that amusing. As indicated by this hypothesis funniness can be acknowledged when the disjointedness is settled (Martin, 2007; Suls, Goldstein, McGhee, 1972 pp 81-100). Confusion hypothesis tests for diversion cognizance and silliness creation capacity. More established grown-ups have more prominent trouble with diversion understanding because of age-related psychological decrease in contrast with youthful grown-ups. Because of the potential physical and mental advantages of funniness further examination might be important to illuminate the job of insight in amusingness understanding. Comical inclination has its very own one of a kind attributes and contrasts and in any social circumstance humor is available and the idea of what is seen as interesting fluctuates generally among people, social orders, sexual orientation, and societies. Whenever Kruse and Prazak (2006) evidently recognize that "view of amusingness is exceptional to the individual" and is an "abstract perceptual encounter," it would appear by endeavoring to figure out what is comical for a gathering; that announcement opposes the individual, subjectivity, and individual nature of funniness. Individuals of each age gathering and culture appreciate creating humor once a day. Some of the time a snicker, at any rate for the minute can be everything. Understanding the relevant implications of cleverness in more established grown-ups is imperative. When trying to comprehend humor it might be hard to separate the capacity to see, make and appreciate (intellectual) a joke, from the enthusiastic reaction of giggling and prosperity. Age related decreases in insight and generational contrasts in diversion may add to diminished funniness perceptions which recommend thankfulness may rely on having the important intellectual assets to fathom the joke (Schaier and Cicirelli, 1976). In fact past work has discovered that age contrasts in diversion thankfulness have solid connections to age contrasts in conservatism. Contrasts in socially suitable and wrong impression of what>GET ANSWER