Police Misconduct: False Claims and Unlawful Entry

  Write in the Toulmin Model of Argumentation(Claim, Evidence, Warrant, References) & Use at least 3 out of the 26 Peer-Reviewed Journals provided as evidence 26 Peer-Reviewed Journals 1.    American Journal of Political Science 2.    American Journal of Psychiatry 3.    American Journal of Sociology 4.    American Political Science Review 5.    American Sociological Review 6.    British Journal of Criminology 7.    Crime and Delinquency 8.    Criminology 9.    Criminology and Public Policy 10.    European Journal of Policing Studies 11.    Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 12.    Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 13.    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 14.    Journal of Politics 15.    Journal of Quantitative Criminology 16.    Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 17.    Justice Quarterly 18.    Law and Human Behavior 19.    Law and Society Review 20.    Policing and Society 21.    Police Practice and Research 22.    Police Quarterly 23.    Policing : A Journal of Policy and Practice 24.    Policing : An International Journal of strategies and Management 25.    Social Problems 26.    The Police Journal For this discussion: 1. Read the article at this link  http://www.nj.com/union/index.ssf/2013/09/roselle_park_police_caught_on_camera_lawsuit_says_officers_falsely_claimed_to_have_a_search_warrant.html 2. How could the police have legally entered the home? Hint: name at least two recognized exceptions to the written warrant requirement. 3. If the police are found to be liable, then what do you believe are appropriate sanctions?  
  Police Misconduct: False Claims and Unlawful Entry Claim: The Roselle Park Police officers falsely claimed to have a search warrant and entered the home of Phillip Szabo without legal justification. Evidence: According to the lawsuit filed by Szabo, the audio and video recording from his home surveillance system clearly shows that the police officers falsely claimed to have a search warrant. The lawsuit alleges that the officers gained entry to the apartment unlawfully, without meeting the requirements for a valid search warrant. Attorneys for Szabo have determined that the police never actually obtained a search warrant for the apartment. The video recording shows at least two officers speaking at the door, with one officer saying, “Open the door, why come trash the place?” and another officer responding, “No, we got a search warrant on the way.” This exchange suggests that the officers were trying to persuade Szabo to open the door based on a false claim of having a search warrant. The lawsuit further alleges that the police officers planted drugs in Szabo’s apartment, as the video recording shows drugs being placed on a table next to a glass pipe. Warrant: Based on the evidence presented, it is reasonable to conclude that the police officers falsely claimed to have a search warrant and unlawfully entered Phillip Szabo’s apartment. Legal Exceptions to the Written Warrant Requirement: Exigent Circumstances: If the police have reason to believe that there is an immediate threat to life or safety, they may enter a home without a warrant. Consent: If the owner or occupant of a home voluntarily gives consent for the police to enter, they may do so without a warrant. Appropriate Sanctions: If the police officers are found to be liable for their actions, appropriate sanctions should be imposed to ensure accountability and prevent future misconduct. These sanctions could include: Disciplinary Action: The officers involved should face internal disciplinary measures, such as suspension, demotion, or termination, depending on the severity of their misconduct. Criminal Charges: If evidence supports criminal wrongdoing, the officers should be prosecuted accordingly. Civil Lawsuits: Szabo and his friends should be awarded monetary damages for the violation of their rights, false arrest, and emotional distress caused by the incident. Reforms and Training: The police department should implement reforms and provide training to prevent similar incidents in the future. This may include better oversight, stricter adherence to protocols, and improved training on search and seizure laws. It is essential to hold law enforcement accountable for their actions to maintain public trust and uphold the integrity of the justice system. References: American Journal of Political Science https://www.cambridge.org/journals/american-journal-of-political-science American Journal of Psychiatry https://ajp.psychiatryonline.org/ American Journal of Sociology https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/toc/ajs/current  

Sample Answer