Write in the Toulmin Model of Argumentation(Claim, Evidence, Warrant, References) & Use at least 3 out of the 26 Peer-Reviewed Journals provided as evidence

26 Peer-Reviewed Journals
1.    American Journal of Political Science
2.    American Journal of Psychiatry
3.    American Journal of Sociology
4.    American Political Science Review
5.    American Sociological Review
6.    British Journal of Criminology
7.    Crime and Delinquency
8.    Criminology
9.    Criminology and Public Policy
10.    European Journal of Policing Studies
11.    Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
12.    Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology
13.    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
14.    Journal of Politics
15.    Journal of Quantitative Criminology
16.    Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency
17.    Justice Quarterly
18.    Law and Human Behavior
19.    Law and Society Review
20.    Policing and Society
21.    Police Practice and Research
22.    Police Quarterly
23.    Policing : A Journal of Policy and Practice
24.    Policing : An International Journal of strategies and Management
25.    Social Problems
26.    The Police Journal

For this discussion:
1. Read the article at this link  http://www.nj.com/union/index.ssf/2013/09/roselle_park_police_caught_on_camera_lawsuit_says_officers_falsely_claimed_to_have_a_search_warrant.html
2. How could the police have legally entered the home? Hint: name at least two recognized exceptions to the written warrant requirement.
3. If the police are found to be liable, then what do you believe are appropriate sanctions?

 

Sample solution

Dante Alighieri played a critical role in the literature world through his poem Divine Comedy that was written in the 14th century. The poem contains Inferno, Purgatorio, and Paradiso. The Inferno is a description of the nine circles of torment that are found on the earth. It depicts the realms of the people that have gone against the spiritual values and who, instead, have chosen bestial appetite, violence, or fraud and malice. The nine circles of hell are limbo, lust, gluttony, greed and wrath. Others are heresy, violence, fraud, and treachery. The purpose of this paper is to examine the Dante’s Inferno in the perspective of its portrayal of God’s image and the justification of hell. 

In this epic poem, God is portrayed as a super being guilty of multiple weaknesses including being egotistic, unjust, and hypocritical. Dante, in this poem, depicts God as being more human than divine by challenging God’s omnipotence. Additionally, the manner in which Dante describes Hell is in full contradiction to the morals of God as written in the Bible. When god arranges Hell to flatter Himself, He commits egotism, a sin that is common among human beings (Cheney, 2016). The weakness is depicted in Limbo and on the Gate of Hell where, for instance, God sends those who do not worship Him to Hell. This implies that failure to worship Him is a sin.

God is also depicted as lacking justice in His actions thus removing the godly image. The injustice is portrayed by the manner in which the sodomites and opportunists are treated. The opportunists are subjected to banner chasing in their lives after death followed by being stung by insects and maggots. They are known to having done neither good nor bad during their lifetimes and, therefore, justice could have demanded that they be granted a neutral punishment having lived a neutral life. The sodomites are also punished unfairly by God when Brunetto Lattini is condemned to hell despite being a good leader (Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). While he commited sodomy, God chooses to ignore all the other good deeds that Brunetto did.

Finally, God is also portrayed as being hypocritical in His actions, a sin that further diminishes His godliness and makes Him more human. A case in point is when God condemns the sin of egotism and goes ahead to commit it repeatedly. Proverbs 29:23 states that “arrogance will bring your downfall, but if you are humble, you will be respected.” When Slattery condemns Dante’s human state as being weak, doubtful, and limited, he is proving God’s hypocrisy because He is also human (Verdicchio, 2015). The actions of God in Hell as portrayed by Dante are inconsistent with the Biblical literature. Both Dante and God are prone to making mistakes, something common among human beings thus making God more human.

To wrap it up, Dante portrays God is more human since He commits the same sins that humans commit: egotism, hypocrisy, and injustice. Hell is justified as being a destination for victims of the mistakes committed by God. The Hell is presented as being a totally different place as compared to what is written about it in the Bible. As a result, reading through the text gives an image of God who is prone to the very mistakes common to humans thus ripping Him off His lofty status of divine and, instead, making Him a mere human. Whether or not Dante did it intentionally is subject to debate but one thing is clear in the poem: the misconstrued notion of God is revealed to future generations.

 

References

Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). Dante’s inferno: Seven deadly sins in scientific publishing and how to avoid them. Addiction Science: A Guide for the Perplexed, 267.

Cheney, L. D. G. (2016). Illustrations for Dante’s Inferno: A Comparative Study of Sandro Botticelli, Giovanni Stradano, and Federico Zuccaro. Cultural and Religious Studies4(8), 487.

Verdicchio, M. (2015). Irony and Desire in Dante’s” Inferno” 27. Italica, 285-297.

Sample Answer

Sample Answer

 

Police Misconduct: False Claims and Unlawful Entry
Claim:
The Roselle Park Police officers falsely claimed to have a search warrant and entered the home of Phillip Szabo without legal justification.

Evidence:
According to the lawsuit filed by Szabo, the audio and video recording from his home surveillance system clearly shows that the police officers falsely claimed to have a search warrant.
The lawsuit alleges that the officers gained entry to the apartment unlawfully, without meeting the requirements for a valid search warrant.
Attorneys for Szabo have determined that the police never actually obtained a search warrant for the apartment.
The video recording shows at least two officers speaking at the door, with one officer saying, “Open the door, why come trash the place?” and another officer responding, “No, we got a search warrant on the way.” This exchange suggests that the officers were trying to persuade Szabo to open the door based on a false claim of having a search warrant.
The lawsuit further alleges that the police officers planted drugs in Szabo’s apartment, as the video recording shows drugs being placed on a table next to a glass pipe.
Warrant:
Based on the evidence presented, it is reasonable to conclude that the police officers falsely claimed to have a search warrant and unlawfully entered Phillip Szabo’s apartment.
Legal Exceptions to the Written Warrant Requirement:
Exigent Circumstances: If the police have reason to believe that there is an immediate threat to life or safety, they may enter a home without a warrant.
Consent: If the owner or occupant of a home voluntarily gives consent for the police to enter, they may do so without a warrant.
Appropriate Sanctions:
If the police officers are found to be liable for their actions, appropriate sanctions should be imposed to ensure accountability and prevent future misconduct. These sanctions could include:

Disciplinary Action: The officers involved should face internal disciplinary measures, such as suspension, demotion, or termination, depending on the severity of their misconduct.
Criminal Charges: If evidence supports criminal wrongdoing, the officers should be prosecuted accordingly.
Civil Lawsuits: Szabo and his friends should be awarded monetary damages for the violation of their rights, false arrest, and emotional distress caused by the incident.
Reforms and Training: The police department should implement reforms and provide training to prevent similar incidents in the future. This may include better oversight, stricter adherence to protocols, and improved training on search and seizure laws.
It is essential to hold law enforcement accountable for their actions to maintain public trust and uphold the integrity of the justice system.
References:
American Journal of Political Science https://www.cambridge.org/journals/american-journal-of-political-science
American Journal of Psychiatry https://ajp.psychiatryonline.org/
American Journal of Sociology https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/toc/ajs/current

 

This question has been answered.

Get Answer