Present an analysis of below case study, you are asked to discuss on the following aspects from your analysis of the case study and your findings by researching further into it.
Collaborative intelligence: Humans and AI Are Joining Forces. Wilson HJ, Daugherty PR. Harvard Business Review. 96(4), 2018. http://ezproxy.uhd.edu/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=
- Case study are from the Harvard Business Review journal. Download the cases from the UHD Library databases. Full citations of the cases are on the next pages.
- Summarize the case study.
- Relate the framework / technologies / solutions mentioned in the case study to the topics you are studying in the textbook.
- Relate the framework / technologies / solutions mentioned in the case study to your work experience. Discuss anything that you learnt from the case study you can apply to your work and/or the other way around, which would be whether you can apply lessons learnt from your own experience to the case study.
- Relate how the framework / technologies / solutions mentioned in the case study are
being used to improve business processes and build solutions in the fields of energy, infrastructure, urban design and LEED – Leadership in Energy and Environment Design (LEED), agriculture, healthcare, transportation, social media, or other.
- Cite your references. It is expected that you will research significantly beyond the textbook to prepare your case study presentation.
Please pay attention to the following formatting and logistical requirements.
• Write a transcript of your presentation that you must also submit. Write the full transcript in a single Word document.
The purpose of the transcript is to document in as much detail as you can the content of you present as a means to prepare your presentation. The instructors will go through your transcript when reviewing your presentation for a grade. However, do not read from your transcript because that will be a reflection of a lack of confidence in effective public speaking.
Use a good balance of text and graphics in your slides. Well-chosen charts and images help your audience understand your point better.
ourts will refuse to provide effect to a testator’s guidelines which can be opposite to public policy is a well -diagnosed common regulation floor restricting the precept of freedom of testation’. The court docket deleted the offending phrases on the idea of common law. The court determined in this situation that not all clauses in the will that differentiate between human beings are invalid, only these that have as impact a unfair discrimination on grounds of gender, race or religion will fall foul of the non – discrimination guidelines. The case Curators Emma Smith educational Fund v college of Kwa-Zulu Natal and Others deals with a will in which accept as true with profits became to be implemented closer to the better training of ecu ladies born of British South African mother and father, the ultimate court of appeal showed the deletion of the phrases “european” and “British” from the accept as true with instrument. The ideally suited courtroom of attraction brushed off an appeal towards a judgment that deleted a racially restrictive clause proscribing the beneficiaries of the Fund to white girls. The university applied to the high court to have the racially restrictive clause removed because the university contended that it's far contrary to public coverage and is in struggle with public interest. The curators of the fund appealed to the ideally suited court of attraction however the court held that there was a constitutional vital to take away racially restrictive clauses in battle with public policy. The splendid court docket of attraction noted that for the reason that invoice of Rights applies to all law together with the regulation referring to charitable trusts there may be absolute confidence that within the public sphere a racially discriminatory testamentary disposition can not pass constitutional muster. The supreme court docket of enchantment held also that the constitutional vital to cast off racially restrictive clauses that war with public policy from the situations of an academic trust meant to advantage prospective students in want, administered by way of a publicly funded educational organization consisting of a college takes precedence over freedom of testation mainly given the essential values of the South African charter. In Board of Executors v Benjamin Godlieb Heydenrych Testamentary agree with and Others , the Western Cape high court docket held that the provision of scholarships by the testamentary accept as true with to eu boys who're individuals of the white populace group, amounted to unfair discrimination on grounds of gender and race and in battle with phase 9(4) of the charter and public hobby. The court docket found that due to the fact the wills have been accomplished before the advent of the constitution, the testators did not foresee that the scholarships would be rendered unconstitutional and unlawful. moreover, they did no longer foresee that the charitable purpose of the believe might be hampered with the aid of the discriminatory situations imposed. The court ordered that the offending provisions be struck out. In BoE consider restricted NO & others the case address a accept as true with installation with a view to offer small bursaries to assist white South African college students. In case it ought to come to be not possible to carry out the phrases of the believe, the testatrix directed that the profits generated through the believe must accept to charitable companies. All four invited universities refused to choose students because of the racial choice criterion attached to the bursary. The judge reaffirmed in this situation that freedom of testation is taken into consideration one of the founding concepts of the South African regulation of testate succession. however freedom of testation, and the rights underlying it, are not absolute via regarding some other case Rhode versus Stubbs in which the stability to be struck between freedom of testation and its limitations become formulated as follows: Now the golden rule for the interpretation of testaments is to examine the needs of the testator from the language used. And while these wishes are ascertained, the courtroom is bound to give effect to them, until we're avoided through a few rule of law from doing so’. therefore the decide refused to order to delete the phrase ‘white’ and he regarded to fulfil another vital principle, particularly that>GET ANSWER