Preservation of the verifiable integrity of digital evidence

Preservation of the verifiable integrity of digital evidence is of utmost importance in the field of digital forensics. Ensuring that the original evidence remains unmodified throughout the investigation process is crucial to its admissibility in court, as well as maintaining the credibility of the forensic analyst and the integrity of the overall investigation. In this essay, we will summarize the process used to preserve the verifiable integrity of digital evidence, and discuss how an analyst can demonstrate that the original evidence is unmodified. The process of preserving the verifiable integrity of digital evidence involves several steps, starting from the initial acquisition of the evidence to its analysis and presentation in court. The goal is to maintain a clear and unbroken chain of custody, ensuring that the evidence is kept securely and unaltered. The first step in the preservation process is the acquisition of the digital evidence. This involves making a bit-for-bit copy, or forensic image, of the original source, such as a computer hard drive or a mobile device. The forensic image is an exact replica of the original data, including any hidden or deleted files, and is typically created using specialized forensic tools. It is essential to create this forensic image to avoid any alterations to the original evidence during the investigation. Once the forensic image is created, it is vital to maintain its integrity throughout the investigation. This is accomplished through the use of hashes or cryptographic algorithms to create a unique digital fingerprint of the forensic image. A hash value is a fixed-size string of characters that is generated based on the contents of the digital evidence. Even a small change in the evidence's data will result in a significantly different hash value. By comparing the hash value of the original forensic image to the hash of the duplicate copies, an analyst can ensure that the copies have not been tampered with. Furthermore, to maintain integrity, the forensic image and any subsequent copies must be stored in a secure environment. This typically involves keeping the evidence in a locked storage facility, preferably with controlled access and climate control to protect against environmental factors that can damage the media. Additionally, it is essential to log and record any access to the evidence, including the names of individuals involved, the time of access, and the purpose of the access. This helps establish a chain of custody and ensures that any changes or modifications to the evidence are documented. To demonstrate that the original evidence is unmodified, an analyst can employ various techniques and tools. Firstly, as mentioned earlier, the comparison of hash values plays a vital role. By comparing the hash value of the original forensic image to that of the subsequent copies, an analyst can verify the integrity of all duplicates. If the hash values match, it indicates that the evidence has not been modified. Another powerful tool for demonstrating the unmodified integrity of digital evidence is the use of Write Blockers. Write Blockers are hardware or software devices that prevent any write operations to the original source or forensic image. By utilizing a Write Blocker, the forensic analyst can guarantee that no alterations are made to the original evidence during the analysis process, further supporting its verifiable integrity. Moreover, timestamps and digital signatures can also be used to demonstrate the unmodified nature of the digital evidence. Timestamps provide a record of when a specific event or action occurred, allowing an analyst to trace any potential modifications made to the evidence. Digital signatures, on the other hand, are cryptographic techniques used to verify the authenticity and integrity of digital documents. By digitally signing the forensic image or subsequent copies, an analyst can provide strong evidence of the unmodified nature of the evidence. In conclusion, preserving the verifiable integrity of digital evidence is a fundamental aspect of digital forensics. By following the process of acquisition, hash comparison, and secure storage, forensic analysts can ensure the integrity of the evidence throughout the investigation process. Furthermore, by utilizing tools such as Write Blockers and employing techniques like timestamps and digital signatures, analysts can effectively demonstrate that the original evidence remains unmodified. Adhering to these practices not only ensures the admissibility of the evidence in court but also safeguards the credibility of the forensic analyst and maintains the integrity of the investigation as a whole. Citations: 1. Casey, E. (2018). Digital Evidence and Computer Crime: Forensic Science, Computers, and the Internet. Academic Press. 2. Carrier, B. (2005). File system forensic analysis. Addison-Wesley Professional. 3. Nelson, B., & Phillips, A. (2008). Guide to computer forensics and investigations. Cengage Learning. 4. Quick, D. & Choo, K. K. R. (2020). Digital Forensics: Challenges and Future Research Directions. In Digital Forensics (pp. 3-19). Springer.    

Sample Answer