Promoting Policy Change to Address Healthcare Inequality
Submit a 2- to 3-page proposal that addresses the following:
Provide a brief synopsis of the social problem you selected in Week 2.
Provide a brief synopsis of the policy you selected in Week 4.
Explain your selection of a policy—why, as a policy advocate, did you select this specific policy to promote change regarding the social problem?
Identify the person or group who enacted the policy and explain their motivation or reason for advocating for this policy. How does the reason differ from your own advocacy and change goals?
Describe the ways in which the policy impacts the populations and discuss the consequences—intended and unintended. Hint: Build on your answer to the following part of your Week 4 Assignment:
Explain how this policy affects clients you might see in a clinical setting and why, as a clinical social worker, it would be important to advocate for change.
Describe your initial work to change the policy (i.e., plan for social advocacy).
Be sure to incorporate the sources you found using standard APA format.
WEEK 2 SOCIAL PROBLEM = Healthcare inequality. (see attached wk2 assignment)
WEEK 4 SOCIAL PROBLEM = find a state or national policy that helps with healthcare inequality. NO LOCAL POLICY
TO PREPARE:
Read Chapter 8 of the Jansson text.
Selected at least five sources to support your advocacy proposal. The sources may be related to specific consequences of the social problem, issues related to the policy, or steps for advocacy.
1 REFERENCE:
Jansson, B. S. (2018). Becoming an effective policy advocate: From policy practice to social justice (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Chapter 8, “Placing Policy Proposals in Policy Briefs in the Second, Third, and Fourth Steps of Policy Analysis” (pp. 246–283)
Proposal: Promoting Policy Change to Address Healthcare Inequality
Introduction
In this proposal, we will address the social problem of healthcare inequality and the selected policy that aims to mitigate this issue. We will explain the rationale behind selecting this policy as a means to promote change, discuss the motivations of the enacting group, and explore the intended and unintended consequences of the policy. Additionally, we will outline an initial plan for social advocacy to bring about policy change.
Synopsis of the Social Problem: Healthcare Inequality
Healthcare inequality refers to the disparities in access to quality healthcare services among different populations. This issue is particularly prevalent in the United States, where individuals from marginalized communities often face barriers such as lack of insurance coverage, limited healthcare facilities in their neighborhoods, and discrimination in healthcare delivery. These inequities result in poorer health outcomes and perpetuate the cycle of poverty and disadvantage.
Synopsis of the Selected Policy: State or National Policy for Healthcare Equality
The selected policy to address healthcare inequality is a state or national policy that aims to provide equal access to healthcare services for all individuals, regardless of their socioeconomic status, race, or geographic location. This policy seeks to eliminate barriers to healthcare by expanding insurance coverage, increasing funding for community health centers, and implementing measures to reduce discrimination in healthcare delivery.
Rationale for Policy Selection
As a policy advocate, the selected policy was chosen because it addresses the root causes of healthcare inequality and provides comprehensive solutions to improve access to healthcare services. This policy aligns with the principles of social justice and aims to create a more equitable healthcare system. By promoting this policy, we can work towards reducing health disparities and ensuring that everyone has equal opportunities to lead healthy lives.
Motivation of the Enacting Group
The enacting group, which could be state legislators or policymakers at the national level, advocates for this policy due to various reasons. Their motivation may stem from a desire to fulfill their constituents’ needs, address public health concerns, or align with their political ideologies. While their motivations may differ from our own advocacy goals, both parties ultimately seek to promote equitable access to healthcare.
Impacts and Consequences of the Policy
Intended Consequences
Improved access to healthcare services for marginalized populations.
Reduction in health disparities and improved health outcomes.
Increased availability of insurance coverage for individuals previously uninsured.
Enhanced funding for community health centers, leading to improved healthcare infrastructure in underserved areas.
Unintended Consequences
Potential strain on healthcare resources due to increased demand.
Economic implications resulting from expanded insurance coverage and increased funding requirements.
Resistance from certain groups or stakeholders who may perceive this policy as a threat to their interests.
Policy’s Impact on Clinical Social Work Clients
This policy has significant implications for clients seen in clinical settings. By addressing healthcare inequality, it ensures that clients from marginalized communities have access to necessary medical care, preventive services, and mental health support. As a clinical social worker, advocating for change is crucial as it promotes the overall well-being of clients and helps break the cycle of poverty and poor health outcomes.
Initial Plan for Social Advocacy
To bring about policy change regarding healthcare inequality, the following steps can be taken:
Raise Awareness: Utilize various platforms such as social media, community forums, and educational campaigns to raise awareness about healthcare inequality and its impact on marginalized populations.
Mobilize Support: Engage with community organizations, healthcare professionals, policymakers, and advocacy groups to build a coalition of support for the policy change.
Lobbying Efforts: Meet with policymakers at local, state, or national levels to advocate for the adoption of policies that address healthcare inequality.
Collaborative Partnerships: Form partnerships with other stakeholders such as healthcare providers, insurers, and community organizations to develop comprehensive strategies for implementing the policy.
Monitor and Evaluate: Continuously monitor the implementation of the policy and assess its effectiveness in reducing healthcare inequality. Advocate for adjustments and improvements as needed.
Conclusion
Addressing healthcare inequality is crucial in creating a more just society where everyone has equal access to quality healthcare services. By promoting a state or national policy that aims to mitigate this issue, we can work towards achieving equitable health outcomes for all individuals. Through social advocacy efforts outlined in this proposal, we can bring about positive change and contribute to building a healthier and more equitable future for all.