The pros and cons of a electric car and a gas powered vehicle,And how both of them could help the enviorment
Sample solution
Dante Alighieri played a critical role in the literature world through his poem Divine Comedy that was written in the 14th century. The poem contains Inferno, Purgatorio, and Paradiso. The Inferno is a description of the nine circles of torment that are found on the earth. It depicts the realms of the people that have gone against the spiritual values and who, instead, have chosen bestial appetite, violence, or fraud and malice. The nine circles of hell are limbo, lust, gluttony, greed and wrath. Others are heresy, violence, fraud, and treachery. The purpose of this paper is to examine the Dante’s Inferno in the perspective of its portrayal of God’s image and the justification of hell.
In this epic poem, God is portrayed as a super being guilty of multiple weaknesses including being egotistic, unjust, and hypocritical. Dante, in this poem, depicts God as being more human than divine by challenging God’s omnipotence. Additionally, the manner in which Dante describes Hell is in full contradiction to the morals of God as written in the Bible. When god arranges Hell to flatter Himself, He commits egotism, a sin that is common among human beings (Cheney, 2016). The weakness is depicted in Limbo and on the Gate of Hell where, for instance, God sends those who do not worship Him to Hell. This implies that failure to worship Him is a sin.
God is also depicted as lacking justice in His actions thus removing the godly image. The injustice is portrayed by the manner in which the sodomites and opportunists are treated. The opportunists are subjected to banner chasing in their lives after death followed by being stung by insects and maggots. They are known to having done neither good nor bad during their lifetimes and, therefore, justice could have demanded that they be granted a neutral punishment having lived a neutral life. The sodomites are also punished unfairly by God when Brunetto Lattini is condemned to hell despite being a good leader (Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). While he commited sodomy, God chooses to ignore all the other good deeds that Brunetto did.
Finally, God is also portrayed as being hypocritical in His actions, a sin that further diminishes His godliness and makes Him more human. A case in point is when God condemns the sin of egotism and goes ahead to commit it repeatedly. Proverbs 29:23 states that “arrogance will bring your downfall, but if you are humble, you will be respected.” When Slattery condemns Dante’s human state as being weak, doubtful, and limited, he is proving God’s hypocrisy because He is also human (Verdicchio, 2015). The actions of God in Hell as portrayed by Dante are inconsistent with the Biblical literature. Both Dante and God are prone to making mistakes, something common among human beings thus making God more human.
To wrap it up, Dante portrays God is more human since He commits the same sins that humans commit: egotism, hypocrisy, and injustice. Hell is justified as being a destination for victims of the mistakes committed by God. The Hell is presented as being a totally different place as compared to what is written about it in the Bible. As a result, reading through the text gives an image of God who is prone to the very mistakes common to humans thus ripping Him off His lofty status of divine and, instead, making Him a mere human. Whether or not Dante did it intentionally is subject to debate but one thing is clear in the poem: the misconstrued notion of God is revealed to future generations.
References
Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). Dante’s inferno: Seven deadly sins in scientific publishing and how to avoid them. Addiction Science: A Guide for the Perplexed, 267.
Cheney, L. D. G. (2016). Illustrations for Dante’s Inferno: A Comparative Study of Sandro Botticelli, Giovanni Stradano, and Federico Zuccaro. Cultural and Religious Studies, 4(8), 487.
Verdicchio, M. (2015). Irony and Desire in Dante’s” Inferno” 27. Italica, 285-297.
Sample Answer
Sample Answer
Pros and Cons of Electric Cars and Gas-Powered Vehicles: How They Impact the Environment
Introduction
The transportation sector is a significant contributor to greenhouse gas emissions and air pollution. As concerns over climate change and environmental degradation grow, the choice between electric cars and gas-powered vehicles becomes crucial. This essay will explore the pros and cons of each vehicle type and their respective impacts on the environment.
Electric Cars
Pros:
Reduced Emissions: Electric cars produce zero tailpipe emissions, meaning they do not release harmful pollutants into the atmosphere. This significantly reduces air pollution and improves air quality in urban areas.
Lower Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Electric cars have lower or zero greenhouse gas emissions, depending on the source of electricity generation. When powered by renewable energy sources, they can contribute to a significant reduction in carbon dioxide emissions.
Energy Efficiency: Electric cars are more energy-efficient than gas-powered vehicles. They convert a higher percentage of energy from their batteries to power the wheels, resulting in less wasted energy and increased overall efficiency.
Lower Operating Costs: Electric cars have lower operating costs compared to gas-powered vehicles. They require less maintenance, as they have fewer moving parts, and electricity is generally cheaper than gasoline.
Cons:
Limited Driving Range: Electric cars typically have a shorter driving range compared to gas-powered vehicles. Although battery technology is improving, long-distance travel may require more frequent charging stops.
Charging Infrastructure: The availability of charging stations is still limited in some areas, which can be a barrier to widespread adoption of electric cars. However, this is rapidly changing as governments and private companies invest in expanding charging networks.
Longer Refueling Time: Charging an electric car takes longer than refueling a gas-powered vehicle. Although fast-charging stations are becoming more common, it can still take significantly longer to recharge an electric car compared to filling up a gas tank.
Gas-Powered Vehicles
Pros:
Greater Driving Range: Gas-powered vehicles typically have a longer driving range compared to electric cars. This makes them more suitable for long-distance travel without the need for frequent refueling or recharging.
Widespread Infrastructure: Gas stations are readily available in most areas, providing easy access to fuel for gas-powered vehicles. This convenience allows for greater flexibility and convenience when it comes to traveling long distances.
Faster Refueling: Filling up a gas tank takes significantly less time compared to recharging an electric car’s battery. This makes gas-powered vehicles more convenient for those who require quick refueling on the go.
Cons:
Higher Emissions: Gas-powered vehicles contribute to air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions through the combustion of fossil fuels. The release of carbon dioxide, nitrogen oxides, and particulate matter has detrimental effects on air quality and contributes to climate change.
Higher Operating Costs: Gas-powered vehicles require regular maintenance, such as oil changes and engine tune-ups. Additionally, the cost of gasoline can be volatile, leading to higher operating expenses compared to electric cars.
Dependency on Fossil Fuels: Gas-powered vehicles rely on fossil fuels, which are finite resources that contribute to environmental degradation through extraction and refinement processes.
Environmental Impact
Both electric cars and gas-powered vehicles can contribute to environmental sustainability:
Electric cars help reduce greenhouse gas emissions and air pollution when powered by renewable energy sources.
Gas-powered vehicles can still play a role in environmental conservation by adopting cleaner fuel alternatives such as biofuels or compressed natural gas (CNG).
Conclusion
While electric cars offer numerous environmental benefits, including reduced emissions and energy efficiency, they also face challenges related to driving range and charging infrastructure. On the other hand, gas-powered vehicles provide greater driving range and refueling convenience but contribute significantly to air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions. Ultimately, transitioning to electric cars and adopting cleaner fuel alternatives for gas-powered vehicles are essential steps towards mitigating climate change and preserving the environment for future generations.
