Protecting human research participants is of utmost importance. Even though your change project will not be
implemented in the field and you will not be engaging with human subjects in this context, it is still critical that
all healthcare professionals have a solid foundation in patient rights and protections within the realm of
research.
It is essential that all healthcare professionals, whether or not they are currently involved in research studies,
remain aware of regulatory policies and updates such as the Federal Policy for the Protection of Human
Subjects, or Common Rule, that will take effect January 2019.
https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2017/01/19/2017-01058/federal-policy-for-the-protection-of-humansubjects
Review the Frequently Asked Questions on Requirements for Education at the National Institutes of Health
(NIH) link here:
https://humansubjects.nih.gov/requirement-education
If you would like to review more information, you can go to the following link to view 12 recorded webinars
related to Human Research Protection on the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services YouTube
channel:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9r8cpgWs7j4&list=PL5965CB14C2506914
Assignment Instructions:

  1. Reflect on what you learned from the NIH materials about protecting the rights of human research
    participants.
  2. Discuss the following in your paper:
    -Describe the circumstances that influenced the need for a policy to protect human research subjects. Give
    examples of specific ways human research subjects can be harmed by researchers.
    -Identify three vulnerable populations and the special restrictions associated with human research among
    these groups. Evaluate the requirements and restrictions. Do you think they are adequate? Why or why not?
    -Although you are not implementing a change project at this time, and you may not be directly involved in
    research as part of your professional responsibilities, explain the reasons why it is important for you to know
    about these rights and protections.

Sample Solution

Sample solution

Dante Alighieri played a critical role in the literature world through his poem Divine Comedy that was written in the 14th century. The poem contains Inferno, Purgatorio, and Paradiso. The Inferno is a description of the nine circles of torment that are found on the earth. It depicts the realms of the people that have gone against the spiritual values and who, instead, have chosen bestial appetite, violence, or fraud and malice. The nine circles of hell are limbo, lust, gluttony, greed and wrath. Others are heresy, violence, fraud, and treachery. The purpose of this paper is to examine the Dante’s Inferno in the perspective of its portrayal of God’s image and the justification of hell. 

In this epic poem, God is portrayed as a super being guilty of multiple weaknesses including being egotistic, unjust, and hypocritical. Dante, in this poem, depicts God as being more human than divine by challenging God’s omnipotence. Additionally, the manner in which Dante describes Hell is in full contradiction to the morals of God as written in the Bible. When god arranges Hell to flatter Himself, He commits egotism, a sin that is common among human beings (Cheney, 2016). The weakness is depicted in Limbo and on the Gate of Hell where, for instance, God sends those who do not worship Him to Hell. This implies that failure to worship Him is a sin.

God is also depicted as lacking justice in His actions thus removing the godly image. The injustice is portrayed by the manner in which the sodomites and opportunists are treated. The opportunists are subjected to banner chasing in their lives after death followed by being stung by insects and maggots. They are known to having done neither good nor bad during their lifetimes and, therefore, justice could have demanded that they be granted a neutral punishment having lived a neutral life. The sodomites are also punished unfairly by God when Brunetto Lattini is condemned to hell despite being a good leader (Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). While he commited sodomy, God chooses to ignore all the other good deeds that Brunetto did.

Finally, God is also portrayed as being hypocritical in His actions, a sin that further diminishes His godliness and makes Him more human. A case in point is when God condemns the sin of egotism and goes ahead to commit it repeatedly. Proverbs 29:23 states that “arrogance will bring your downfall, but if you are humble, you will be respected.” When Slattery condemns Dante’s human state as being weak, doubtful, and limited, he is proving God’s hypocrisy because He is also human (Verdicchio, 2015). The actions of God in Hell as portrayed by Dante are inconsistent with the Biblical literature. Both Dante and God are prone to making mistakes, something common among human beings thus making God more human.

To wrap it up, Dante portrays God is more human since He commits the same sins that humans commit: egotism, hypocrisy, and injustice. Hell is justified as being a destination for victims of the mistakes committed by God. The Hell is presented as being a totally different place as compared to what is written about it in the Bible. As a result, reading through the text gives an image of God who is prone to the very mistakes common to humans thus ripping Him off His lofty status of divine and, instead, making Him a mere human. Whether or not Dante did it intentionally is subject to debate but one thing is clear in the poem: the misconstrued notion of God is revealed to future generations.

 

References

Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). Dante’s inferno: Seven deadly sins in scientific publishing and how to avoid them. Addiction Science: A Guide for the Perplexed, 267.

Cheney, L. D. G. (2016). Illustrations for Dante’s Inferno: A Comparative Study of Sandro Botticelli, Giovanni Stradano, and Federico Zuccaro. Cultural and Religious Studies4(8), 487.

Verdicchio, M. (2015). Irony and Desire in Dante’s” Inferno” 27. Italica, 285-297.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer